linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
To: ankita@nvidia.com
Cc: jgg@nvidia.com, maz@kernel.org, oliver.upton@linux.dev,
	joey.gouly@arm.com,  suzuki.poulose@arm.com,
	yuzenghui@huawei.com, catalin.marinas@arm.com,  will@kernel.org,
	ryan.roberts@arm.com, shahuang@redhat.com,
	 lpieralisi@kernel.org, david@redhat.com, aniketa@nvidia.com,
	cjia@nvidia.com,  kwankhede@nvidia.com, kjaju@nvidia.com,
	targupta@nvidia.com,  vsethi@nvidia.com, acurrid@nvidia.com,
	apopple@nvidia.com,  jhubbard@nvidia.com, danw@nvidia.com,
	zhiw@nvidia.com, mochs@nvidia.com,  udhoke@nvidia.com,
	dnigam@nvidia.com, alex.williamson@redhat.com,
	 sebastianene@google.com, coltonlewis@google.com,
	kevin.tian@intel.com,  yi.l.liu@intel.com, ardb@kernel.org,
	akpm@linux-foundation.org,  gshan@redhat.com, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	ddutile@redhat.com, tabba@google.com,  qperret@google.com,
	kvmarm@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	 linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, maobibo@loongson.cn
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 1/5] KVM: arm64: Block cacheable PFNMAP mapping
Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2025 11:11:56 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <aEMvbIu530nCqwhG@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250524013943.2832-2-ankita@nvidia.com>

On Sat, May 24, 2025, ankita@nvidia.com wrote:
> From: Ankit Agrawal <ankita@nvidia.com>
> 
> Fixes a security bug due to mismatched attributes between S1 and
> S2 mapping.
> 
> Currently, it is possible for a region to be cacheable in S1, but mapped
> non cached in S2. This creates a potential issue where the VMM may
> sanitize cacheable memory across VMs using cacheable stores, ensuring
> it is zeroed. However, if KVM subsequently assigns this memory to a VM
> as uncached, the VM could end up accessing stale, non-zeroed data from
> a previous VM, leading to unintended data exposure. This is a security
> risk.
> 
> Block such mismatch attributes case by returning EINVAL when userspace
> try to map PFNMAP cacheable. Only allow NORMAL_NC and DEVICE_*.
> 
> CC: Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev>
> CC: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
> CC: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
> Suggested-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
> Signed-off-by: Ankit Agrawal <ankita@nvidia.com>
> ---
>  arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 22 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c
> index 2feb6c6b63af..305a0e054f81 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c
> @@ -1466,6 +1466,18 @@ static bool kvm_vma_mte_allowed(struct vm_area_struct *vma)
>  	return vma->vm_flags & VM_MTE_ALLOWED;
>  }
>  
> +/*
> + * Determine the memory region cacheability from VMA's pgprot. This
> + * is used to set the stage 2 PTEs.
> + */
> +static unsigned long mapping_type_noncacheable(pgprot_t page_prot)

Return a bool.  And given that all the usage queries cachaeable, maybe invert
this predicate?

> +{
> +	unsigned long mt = FIELD_GET(PTE_ATTRINDX_MASK, pgprot_val(page_prot));
> +
> +	return (mt == MT_NORMAL_NC || mt == MT_DEVICE_nGnRnE ||
> +		mt == MT_DEVICE_nGnRE);
> +}

No need for the parantheses.  And since the values are clumped together, maybe
use a switch statement to let the compiler optimize the checks (though I'm
guessing modern compilers will optimize either way).

E.g.

static bool kvm_vma_is_cacheable(struct vm_area_struct *vma)
{
	switch (FIELD_GET(PTE_ATTRINDX_MASK, pgprot_val(vma->vm_page_prot))) {
	case MT_NORMAL_NC:
	case MT_DEVICE_nGnRnE:
	case MT_DEVICE_nGnRE:
		return false;
	default:
		return true;
	}
}


>  static int user_mem_abort(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, phys_addr_t fault_ipa,
>  			  struct kvm_s2_trans *nested,
>  			  struct kvm_memory_slot *memslot, unsigned long hva,
> @@ -1612,6 +1624,10 @@ static int user_mem_abort(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, phys_addr_t fault_ipa,
>  
>  	vfio_allow_any_uc = vma->vm_flags & VM_ALLOW_ANY_UNCACHED;
>  
> +	if ((vma->vm_flags & VM_PFNMAP) &&
> +	    !mapping_type_noncacheable(vma->vm_page_prot))

I don't think this is correct, and there's a very real chance this will break
existing setups.  PFNMAP memory isn't strictly device memory, and IIUC, KVM
force DEVICE/NORMAL_NC based on kvm_is_device_pfn(), not based on VM_PFNMAP.

	if (kvm_is_device_pfn(pfn)) {
		/*
		 * If the page was identified as device early by looking at
		 * the VMA flags, vma_pagesize is already representing the
		 * largest quantity we can map.  If instead it was mapped
		 * via __kvm_faultin_pfn(), vma_pagesize is set to PAGE_SIZE
		 * and must not be upgraded.
		 *
		 * In both cases, we don't let transparent_hugepage_adjust()
		 * change things at the last minute.
		 */
		device = true;
	}

	if (device) {
		if (vfio_allow_any_uc)
			prot |= KVM_PGTABLE_PROT_NORMAL_NC;
		else
			prot |= KVM_PGTABLE_PROT_DEVICE;
	} else if (cpus_have_final_cap(ARM64_HAS_CACHE_DIC) &&
		   (!nested || kvm_s2_trans_executable(nested))) {
		prot |= KVM_PGTABLE_PROT_X;
	}

which gets morphed into the hardware memtype attributes as:

	switch (prot & (KVM_PGTABLE_PROT_DEVICE |
			KVM_PGTABLE_PROT_NORMAL_NC)) {
	case KVM_PGTABLE_PROT_DEVICE | KVM_PGTABLE_PROT_NORMAL_NC:
		return -EINVAL;
	case KVM_PGTABLE_PROT_DEVICE:
		if (prot & KVM_PGTABLE_PROT_X)
			return -EINVAL;
		attr = KVM_S2_MEMATTR(pgt, DEVICE_nGnRE);
		break;
	case KVM_PGTABLE_PROT_NORMAL_NC:
		if (prot & KVM_PGTABLE_PROT_X)
			return -EINVAL;
		attr = KVM_S2_MEMATTR(pgt, NORMAL_NC);
		break;
	default:
		attr = KVM_S2_MEMATTR(pgt, NORMAL);
	}

E.g. if the admin hides RAM from the kernel and manages it in userspace via
/dev/mem, this will break (I think).

So I believe what you want is something like this:

diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c
index eeda92330ade..4129ab5ac871 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c
@@ -1466,6 +1466,18 @@ static bool kvm_vma_mte_allowed(struct vm_area_struct *vma)
        return vma->vm_flags & VM_MTE_ALLOWED;
 }
 
+static bool kvm_vma_is_cacheable(struct vm_area_struct *vma)
+{
+       switch (FIELD_GET(PTE_ATTRINDX_MASK, pgprot_val(vma->vm_page_prot))) {
+       case MT_NORMAL_NC:
+       case MT_DEVICE_nGnRnE:
+       case MT_DEVICE_nGnRE:
+               return false;
+       default:
+               return true;
+       }
+}
+
 static int user_mem_abort(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, phys_addr_t fault_ipa,
                          struct kvm_s2_trans *nested,
                          struct kvm_memory_slot *memslot, unsigned long hva,
@@ -1473,7 +1485,7 @@ static int user_mem_abort(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, phys_addr_t fault_ipa,
 {
        int ret = 0;
        bool write_fault, writable, force_pte = false;
-       bool exec_fault, mte_allowed;
+       bool exec_fault, mte_allowed, is_vma_cacheable;
        bool device = false, vfio_allow_any_uc = false;
        unsigned long mmu_seq;
        phys_addr_t ipa = fault_ipa;
@@ -1615,6 +1627,8 @@ static int user_mem_abort(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, phys_addr_t fault_ipa,
 
        vfio_allow_any_uc = vma->vm_flags & VM_ALLOW_ANY_UNCACHED;
 
+       is_vma_cacheable = kvm_vma_is_cacheable(vma);
+
        /* Don't use the VMA after the unlock -- it may have vanished */
        vma = NULL;
 
@@ -1639,6 +1653,9 @@ static int user_mem_abort(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, phys_addr_t fault_ipa,
                return -EFAULT;
 
        if (kvm_is_device_pfn(pfn)) {
+               if (is_vma_cacheable)
+                       return -EINVAL;
+
                /*
                 * If the page was identified as device early by looking at
                 * the VMA flags, vma_pagesize is already representing the
@@ -1722,6 +1739,11 @@ static int user_mem_abort(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, phys_addr_t fault_ipa,
                prot |= KVM_PGTABLE_PROT_X;
 
        if (device) {
+               if (is_vma_cacheable) {
+                       ret = -EINVAL;
+                       goto out;
+               }
+
                if (vfio_allow_any_uc)
                        prot |= KVM_PGTABLE_PROT_NORMAL_NC;
                else



  parent reply	other threads:[~2025-06-06 18:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-05-24  1:39 [PATCH v6 0/5] KVM: arm64: Map GPU device memory as cacheable ankita
2025-05-24  1:39 ` [PATCH v6 1/5] KVM: arm64: Block cacheable PFNMAP mapping ankita
2025-05-26 15:25   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-05-27  4:04     ` Ankit Agrawal
2025-06-06 18:11   ` Sean Christopherson [this message]
2025-06-09 12:24     ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-06-09 14:21       ` Sean Christopherson
2025-05-24  1:39 ` [PATCH v6 2/5] KVM: arm64: New function to determine hardware cache management support ankita
2025-05-27  0:25   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-05-24  1:39 ` [PATCH v6 3/5] kvm: arm64: New memslot flag to indicate cacheable mapping ankita
2025-05-27  0:26   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-05-27  4:33     ` Ankit Agrawal
2025-06-02  4:42       ` Ankit Agrawal
2025-06-06 17:57       ` Sean Christopherson
2025-06-13 19:38         ` Oliver Upton
2025-06-16 11:37           ` Ankit Agrawal
2025-05-24  1:39 ` [PATCH v6 4/5] KVM: arm64: Allow cacheable stage 2 mapping using VMA flags ankita
2025-06-06 18:14   ` Sean Christopherson
2025-05-24  1:39 ` [PATCH v6 5/5] KVM: arm64: Expose new KVM cap for cacheable PFNMAP ankita

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=aEMvbIu530nCqwhG@google.com \
    --to=seanjc@google.com \
    --cc=acurrid@nvidia.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
    --cc=aniketa@nvidia.com \
    --cc=ankita@nvidia.com \
    --cc=apopple@nvidia.com \
    --cc=ardb@kernel.org \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=cjia@nvidia.com \
    --cc=coltonlewis@google.com \
    --cc=danw@nvidia.com \
    --cc=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=ddutile@redhat.com \
    --cc=dnigam@nvidia.com \
    --cc=gshan@redhat.com \
    --cc=jgg@nvidia.com \
    --cc=jhubbard@nvidia.com \
    --cc=joey.gouly@arm.com \
    --cc=kevin.tian@intel.com \
    --cc=kjaju@nvidia.com \
    --cc=kvmarm@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=kwankhede@nvidia.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=lpieralisi@kernel.org \
    --cc=maobibo@loongson.cn \
    --cc=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=mochs@nvidia.com \
    --cc=oliver.upton@linux.dev \
    --cc=qperret@google.com \
    --cc=ryan.roberts@arm.com \
    --cc=sebastianene@google.com \
    --cc=shahuang@redhat.com \
    --cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
    --cc=tabba@google.com \
    --cc=targupta@nvidia.com \
    --cc=udhoke@nvidia.com \
    --cc=vsethi@nvidia.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    --cc=yi.l.liu@intel.com \
    --cc=yuzenghui@huawei.com \
    --cc=zhiw@nvidia.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).