From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
To: Dev Jain <dev.jain@arm.com>
Cc: will@kernel.org, david@redhat.com, ryan.roberts@arm.com,
anshuman.khandual@arm.com, mark.rutland@arm.com,
yang@os.amperecomputing.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] arm64: Restrict pagetable teardown to avoid false warning
Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2025 17:37:55 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aEhfY2D-njOEBFst@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250527082633.61073-1-dev.jain@arm.com>
On Tue, May 27, 2025 at 01:56:33PM +0530, Dev Jain wrote:
> Commit 9c006972c3fe removes the pxd_present() checks because the caller
> checks pxd_present(). But, in case of vmap_try_huge_pud(), the caller only
> checks pud_present(); pud_free_pmd_page() recurses on each pmd through
> pmd_free_pte_page(), wherein the pmd may be none. Thus it is possible to
> hit a warning in the latter, since pmd_none => !pmd_table(). Thus, add
> a pmd_present() check in pud_free_pmd_page().
>
> This problem was found by code inspection.
>
> Fixes: 9c006972c3fe (arm64: mmu: drop pXd_present() checks from pXd_free_pYd_table())
> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-06-10 20:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-05-27 8:26 [PATCH v3] arm64: Restrict pagetable teardown to avoid false warning Dev Jain
2025-05-29 9:02 ` Anshuman Khandual
2025-05-29 9:13 ` Ryan Roberts
2025-05-29 9:22 ` Anshuman Khandual
2025-05-30 3:55 ` Dev Jain
2025-05-30 7:05 ` Ryan Roberts
2025-06-10 16:37 ` Catalin Marinas [this message]
2025-06-12 17:27 ` Will Deacon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aEhfY2D-njOEBFst@arm.com \
--to=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=anshuman.khandual@arm.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=dev.jain@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=ryan.roberts@arm.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=yang@os.amperecomputing.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).