From: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
To: Ada Couprie Diaz <ada.coupriediaz@arm.com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
"Luis Claudio R. Goncalves" <lgoncalv@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 02/13] arm64: refactor aarch32_break_handler()
Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2025 18:27:04 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aEhq6JjAJgb8_n4i@J2N7QTR9R3> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250609173413.132168-3-ada.coupriediaz@arm.com>
On Mon, Jun 09, 2025 at 06:34:02PM +0100, Ada Couprie Diaz wrote:
> `aarch32_break_handler()` is called in `do_el0_undef()` when we
> are trying to handle an exception whose Exception Syndrome is unknown.
> It checks if the instruction hit might be a 32-bit arm break (be it
> A32 or T2), and sends a SIGTRAP to userspace if it is so that it can
> be handled.
>
> However, this is badly represented in the naming of the function, and
> is not consistent with the other functions called with the same logic
> in `do_el0_undef()`.
>
> Rename it `try_handle_aarch32_break()` and change the return value to
> a boolean to align with the logic of the other tentative handlers in
> `do_el0_undef()`, the previous error code being ignored anyway.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ada Couprie Diaz <ada.coupriediaz@arm.com>
Acked-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Mark.
> ---
> arch/arm64/include/asm/debug-monitors.h | 2 +-
> arch/arm64/kernel/debug-monitors.c | 10 +++++-----
> arch/arm64/kernel/traps.c | 2 +-
> 3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/debug-monitors.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/debug-monitors.h
> index 8f6ba31b8658..e1caf6a8380c 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/debug-monitors.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/debug-monitors.h
> @@ -116,7 +116,7 @@ static inline int reinstall_suspended_bps(struct pt_regs *regs)
> }
> #endif
>
> -int aarch32_break_handler(struct pt_regs *regs);
> +bool try_handle_aarch32_break(struct pt_regs *regs);
>
> void debug_traps_init(void);
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/debug-monitors.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/debug-monitors.c
> index 676fa0231935..9e69f2e915e8 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/debug-monitors.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/debug-monitors.c
> @@ -334,7 +334,7 @@ static int brk_handler(unsigned long unused, unsigned long esr,
> }
> NOKPROBE_SYMBOL(brk_handler);
[>
> -int aarch32_break_handler(struct pt_regs *regs)
> +bool try_handle_aarch32_break(struct pt_regs *regs)
> {
> u32 arm_instr;
> u16 thumb_instr;
> @@ -342,7 +342,7 @@ int aarch32_break_handler(struct pt_regs *regs)
> void __user *pc = (void __user *)instruction_pointer(regs);
>
> if (!compat_user_mode(regs))
> - return -EFAULT;
> + return false;
>
> if (compat_thumb_mode(regs)) {
> /* get 16-bit Thumb instruction */
> @@ -366,12 +366,12 @@ int aarch32_break_handler(struct pt_regs *regs)
> }
>
> if (!bp)
> - return -EFAULT;
> + return false;
>
> send_user_sigtrap(TRAP_BRKPT);
> - return 0;
> + return true;
> }
> -NOKPROBE_SYMBOL(aarch32_break_handler);
> +NOKPROBE_SYMBOL(try_handle_aarch32_break);
>
> void __init debug_traps_init(void)
> {
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/traps.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/traps.c
> index 9bfa5c944379..685c11b2c553 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/traps.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/traps.c
> @@ -454,7 +454,7 @@ void do_el0_undef(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned long esr)
> u32 insn;
>
> /* check for AArch32 breakpoint instructions */
> - if (!aarch32_break_handler(regs))
> + if (try_handle_aarch32_break(regs))
> return;
>
> if (user_insn_read(regs, &insn))
> --
> 2.43.0
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-06-10 22:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-06-09 17:34 [PATCH v3 00/13] arm64: debug: remove hook registration, split exception entry Ada Couprie Diaz
2025-06-09 17:34 ` [PATCH v3 01/13] arm64: debug: clean up single_step_handler logic Ada Couprie Diaz
2025-06-10 11:43 ` Anshuman Khandual
2025-06-10 17:26 ` Mark Rutland
2025-06-09 17:34 ` [PATCH v3 02/13] arm64: refactor aarch32_break_handler() Ada Couprie Diaz
2025-06-10 11:54 ` Anshuman Khandual
2025-06-10 17:27 ` Mark Rutland [this message]
2025-06-09 17:34 ` [PATCH v3 03/13] arm64: debug: call software break handlers statically Ada Couprie Diaz
2025-06-13 6:11 ` Anshuman Khandual
2025-06-16 13:29 ` Ada Couprie Diaz
2025-06-18 10:28 ` Mark Rutland
2025-06-09 17:34 ` [PATCH v3 04/13] arm64: debug: call step " Ada Couprie Diaz
2025-06-13 7:47 ` Anshuman Khandual
2025-06-16 13:39 ` Ada Couprie Diaz
2025-06-18 10:34 ` Mark Rutland
2025-06-09 17:34 ` [PATCH v3 05/13] arm64: debug: remove break/step handler registration infrastructure Ada Couprie Diaz
2025-06-13 8:14 ` Anshuman Khandual
2025-06-09 17:34 ` [PATCH v3 06/13] arm64: entry: Add entry and exit functions for debug exceptions Ada Couprie Diaz
2025-06-16 8:24 ` Anshuman Khandual
2025-06-09 17:34 ` [PATCH v3 07/13] arm64: debug: split hardware breakpoint exception entry Ada Couprie Diaz
2025-06-09 17:34 ` [PATCH v3 08/13] arm64: debug: refactor reinstall_suspended_bps() Ada Couprie Diaz
2025-06-16 8:49 ` Anshuman Khandual
2025-06-09 17:34 ` [PATCH v3 09/13] arm64: debug: split single stepping exception entry Ada Couprie Diaz
2025-06-18 6:25 ` Anshuman Khandual
2025-06-18 10:14 ` Ada Couprie Diaz
2025-06-18 16:02 ` Mark Rutland
2025-06-20 21:20 ` Ada Couprie Diaz
2025-06-09 17:34 ` [PATCH v3 10/13] arm64: debug: split hardware watchpoint " Ada Couprie Diaz
2025-06-09 17:34 ` [PATCH v3 11/13] arm64: debug: split brk64 " Ada Couprie Diaz
2025-06-18 17:00 ` Mark Rutland
2025-06-09 17:34 ` [PATCH v3 12/13] arm64: debug: split bkpt32 " Ada Couprie Diaz
2025-06-18 17:06 ` Mark Rutland
2025-06-09 17:34 ` [PATCH v3 13/13] arm64: debug: remove debug exception registration infrastructure Ada Couprie Diaz
2025-06-12 18:18 ` [PATCH v3 00/13] arm64: debug: remove hook registration, split exception entry Luis Claudio R. Goncalves
2025-06-16 15:07 ` Ada Couprie Diaz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aEhq6JjAJgb8_n4i@J2N7QTR9R3 \
--to=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=ada.coupriediaz@arm.com \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=lgoncalv@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox