From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D7AADC7115C for ; Fri, 20 Jun 2025 19:31:18 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender:List-Subscribe:List-Help :List-Post:List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:Content-Type: MIME-Version:References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=NgldqAkN4EcKf+iDJigOAF1MecbzOvfvyTrQTD43eRc=; b=arEr14XVGKTmWoFwCrrQSxUzqM ELbI5AdHkCvnh4Ss31P3I3wqdiRvzxa5s40dHrwkQHRcSiu0mscr+r5A7ky7Ic35i6uUH0SlWOtYK DwbSMj14GmwvMb47BO+dXBzWtXceHW+lzqaryG/OTCVCuNS/Izu+F+t22+ERBCEaaJKzlYjUcaG68 Fjx1//WpJWL4/Mye+6MH65W3qpY2dgp9zDb2VrafLP/PpKWIZbtzZgIoEfU6t8JnM/oMzRiaTVQm6 qvgox7T+W5wtIQjP6/IQRjLKfWURmEgnYcONbXcWdD3zURHqbIN73V2xNwImekywEJyVmrtT0DsJr xWYR67Iw==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.98.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1uShSC-0000000GRlt-0n9A; Fri, 20 Jun 2025 19:31:12 +0000 Received: from out-172.mta1.migadu.com ([95.215.58.172]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.98.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1uShPw-0000000GRMn-2ehL for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Fri, 20 Jun 2025 19:28:53 +0000 Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2025 12:27:48 -0700 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linux.dev; s=key1; t=1750447730; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=NgldqAkN4EcKf+iDJigOAF1MecbzOvfvyTrQTD43eRc=; b=W42T7MNlvzs/y0GgOq0jyWHLLYVFWnXTLt8ehslxEORhH363LQ3I2EKnyY/lcXJ7TuYCCP /ddoesoS1z3+FzcQtRf+UEyi/ryVP6PVmtH1LVq3QA7cCZuxX6dbA5NubQaX4Y9lVNRphf Jqn5Jzz8vxkhz8VXmNt/f9dhM/LssW8= X-Report-Abuse: Please report any abuse attempt to abuse@migadu.com and include these headers. From: Oliver Upton To: Sean Christopherson Cc: Marc Zyngier , Paolo Bonzini , Joerg Roedel , David Woodhouse , Lu Baolu , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, kvmarm@lists.linux.dev, kvm@vger.kernel.org, iommu@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Sairaj Kodilkar , Vasant Hegde , Maxim Levitsky , Joao Martins , Francesco Lavra , David Matlack Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 02/62] KVM: arm64: WARN if unmapping vLPI fails Message-ID: References: <20250611224604.313496-2-seanjc@google.com> <20250611224604.313496-4-seanjc@google.com> <86tt4lcgs3.wl-maz@kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_OUT X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20250620_122852_818601_CA3E3D30 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 14.32 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Fri, Jun 20, 2025 at 12:04:19PM -0700, Sean Christopherson wrote: > On Fri, Jun 20, 2025, Oliver Upton wrote: > > Can you just send it out as a standalone patch? It's only tangientally > > related to the truckload of x86 stuff > > The issue is that "KVM: Don't WARN if updating IRQ bypass route fails" directly > depends on both this patch Eh? At worst we break bisection for the warn, which I'm sure we manage to commit similar high crimes on the regular. > If I post it as a standalone patch, could you/Marc put it into a stable topic > branch based on kvm/master? (kvm/master now has patch 1, yay!) Then I can create > a topic branch for this mountain of stuff based on the arm64 topic branch. Ok, how about making the arm64 piece patch 1 in your series and you take the whole pile. If we need it, I'll bug you for a ref that only has the first change. That ok? Thanks, Oliver