From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 88912C7115B for ; Fri, 20 Jun 2025 20:55:07 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender:List-Subscribe:List-Help :List-Post:List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:Content-Type: MIME-Version:References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=ByAPDQByeMdLRhDMIGN/IiSb/H4BbcIKGrfBibrThdw=; b=0agoRl2tXxCQHvAeLiq/zoJ1aV hAW+rXG3EB/g63oeJZ0+I/CCBgd96Z0u19+rnVbu4GYfZKgkEiLBwmNVAAk4U1eQ4Ip/wg29m5SpO /RIFlEKY7JeZR0od31mu4PJ7iZHGd62JVXys+YFoM30KDpcQR4IY/PlzzYEctAn6lvfct3aLGcFj4 nc01WJlT+NWQt7mbb4CsglCZB29pS+tvFRjm2LwrLeg144e0U6ay2Ph59SThxlae3D9YkBBn1mnpy kExbHAfydfNh2KHpG7Ofs1QFaMzVpyJUyTbI7WOm02PY36s5RkhurpFLlRS4TBWrX7hXkbX92ebZZ hdZNp66Q==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.98.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1uSilK-0000000GZzg-0v5U; Fri, 20 Jun 2025 20:55:02 +0000 Received: from out-181.mta0.migadu.com ([91.218.175.181]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.98.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1uSidL-0000000GZPg-203C for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Fri, 20 Jun 2025 20:46:48 +0000 Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2025 13:45:54 -0700 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linux.dev; s=key1; t=1750452395; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=ByAPDQByeMdLRhDMIGN/IiSb/H4BbcIKGrfBibrThdw=; b=wB2JMktH26IhXs7XGQI53IupRTDVbGuWl0qkGpR4EDdkm6Y0SKYhHCVQ3hJR8Rqu2hK1LA N1NJF2AJ9y/cp/vQqHMdmu8F0Mj3Qd4i049KApbe8HC1z3bEABA5689uiXgYJFwU2g76pp zOPEZ4caj/QyY29FLXxszr21nzjdq9A= X-Report-Abuse: Please report any abuse attempt to abuse@migadu.com and include these headers. From: Oliver Upton To: Sean Christopherson Cc: Marc Zyngier , Paolo Bonzini , Joerg Roedel , David Woodhouse , Lu Baolu , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, kvmarm@lists.linux.dev, kvm@vger.kernel.org, iommu@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Sairaj Kodilkar , Vasant Hegde , Maxim Levitsky , Joao Martins , Francesco Lavra , David Matlack Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 02/62] KVM: arm64: WARN if unmapping vLPI fails Message-ID: References: <20250611224604.313496-2-seanjc@google.com> <20250611224604.313496-4-seanjc@google.com> <86tt4lcgs3.wl-maz@kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_OUT X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20250620_134647_658036_E835DE30 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 17.03 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Fri, Jun 20, 2025 at 01:31:55PM -0700, Sean Christopherson wrote: > On Fri, Jun 20, 2025, Oliver Upton wrote: > > On Fri, Jun 20, 2025 at 12:04:19PM -0700, Sean Christopherson wrote: > > > If I post it as a standalone patch, could you/Marc put it into a stable topic > > > branch based on kvm/master? (kvm/master now has patch 1, yay!) Then I can create > > > a topic branch for this mountain of stuff based on the arm64 topic branch. > > > > Ok, how about making the arm64 piece patch 1 in your series and you take > > the whole pile. If we need it, I'll bug you for a ref that only has the > > first change. > > Any preference as to whether I formally post the last version, or if I apply it > directly from this thread? Since I have this email on my phone I'm always in favor of not getting spammed :) This thread has all the discourse too, so likely a better artifact. > > That ok? > > Ya, works for me. What's the going bribe rate for an ack these days? :-D Usually about the cost of a pint ;-) For the arm64 bits: Acked-by: Oliver Upton -- Thanks, Oliver