public inbox for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
To: Jinjie Ruan <ruanjinjie@huawei.com>
Cc: sstabellini@kernel.org, puranjay@kernel.org,
	anshuman.khandual@arm.com, catalin.marinas@arm.com,
	liaochang1@huawei.com, oleg@redhat.com,
	kristina.martsenko@arm.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	broonie@kernel.org, chenl311@chinatelecom.cn,
	xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org, leitao@debian.org,
	ryan.roberts@arm.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org, mbenes@suse.cz,
	will@kernel.org, ardb@kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next v7 5/7] arm64: entry: Refactor preempt_schedule_irq() check code
Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2025 12:13:42 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <aJsh5oM3CoUELkvY@J2N7QTR9R3> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250729015456.3411143-6-ruanjinjie@huawei.com>

On Tue, Jul 29, 2025 at 09:54:54AM +0800, Jinjie Ruan wrote:
> ARM64 requires an additional check whether to reschedule on return
> from interrupt. So add arch_irqentry_exit_need_resched() as the default
> NOP implementation and hook it up into the need_resched() condition in
> raw_irqentry_exit_cond_resched(). This allows ARM64 to implement
> the architecture specific version for switching over to
> the generic entry code.
> 
> To align the structure of the code with irqentry_exit_cond_resched()
> from the generic entry code, hoist the need_irq_preemption()
> and IS_ENABLED() check earlier. And different preemption check functions
> are defined based on whether dynamic preemption is enabled.
> 
> Suggested-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
> Suggested-by: Kevin Brodsky <kevin.brodsky@arm.com>
> Suggested-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
> Signed-off-by: Jinjie Ruan <ruanjinjie@huawei.com>
> ---
>  arch/arm64/include/asm/preempt.h |  4 ++++
>  arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c | 35 ++++++++++++++++++--------------
>  kernel/entry/common.c            | 16 ++++++++++++++-
>  3 files changed, 39 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)

Can you please split the change to kernel/entry/common.c into a separate
patch? That doesn't depend on the arm64-specific changes, and it'll make
it easier to handle any conflcits when merging this.

Mark.

> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/preempt.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/preempt.h
> index 0159b625cc7f..0f0ba250efe8 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/preempt.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/preempt.h
> @@ -85,6 +85,7 @@ static inline bool should_resched(int preempt_offset)
>  void preempt_schedule(void);
>  void preempt_schedule_notrace(void);
>  
> +void raw_irqentry_exit_cond_resched(void);
>  #ifdef CONFIG_PREEMPT_DYNAMIC
>  
>  DECLARE_STATIC_KEY_TRUE(sk_dynamic_irqentry_exit_cond_resched);
> @@ -92,11 +93,14 @@ void dynamic_preempt_schedule(void);
>  #define __preempt_schedule()		dynamic_preempt_schedule()
>  void dynamic_preempt_schedule_notrace(void);
>  #define __preempt_schedule_notrace()	dynamic_preempt_schedule_notrace()
> +void dynamic_irqentry_exit_cond_resched(void);
> +#define irqentry_exit_cond_resched()	dynamic_irqentry_exit_cond_resched()
>  
>  #else /* CONFIG_PREEMPT_DYNAMIC */
>  
>  #define __preempt_schedule()		preempt_schedule()
>  #define __preempt_schedule_notrace()	preempt_schedule_notrace()
> +#define irqentry_exit_cond_resched()	raw_irqentry_exit_cond_resched()
>  
>  #endif /* CONFIG_PREEMPT_DYNAMIC */
>  #endif /* CONFIG_PREEMPTION */
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c
> index 7c2299c1ba79..4f92664fd46c 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c
> @@ -285,19 +285,8 @@ static void noinstr arm64_exit_el1_dbg(struct pt_regs *regs,
>  		lockdep_hardirqs_on(CALLER_ADDR0);
>  }
>  
> -#ifdef CONFIG_PREEMPT_DYNAMIC
> -DEFINE_STATIC_KEY_TRUE(sk_dynamic_irqentry_exit_cond_resched);
> -#define need_irq_preemption() \
> -	(static_branch_unlikely(&sk_dynamic_irqentry_exit_cond_resched))
> -#else
> -#define need_irq_preemption()	(IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PREEMPTION))
> -#endif
> -
>  static inline bool arm64_preempt_schedule_irq(void)
>  {
> -	if (!need_irq_preemption())
> -		return false;
> -
>  	/*
>  	 * DAIF.DA are cleared at the start of IRQ/FIQ handling, and when GIC
>  	 * priority masking is used the GIC irqchip driver will clear DAIF.IF
> @@ -672,6 +661,24 @@ static __always_inline void __el1_pnmi(struct pt_regs *regs,
>  	arm64_exit_nmi(regs, state);
>  }
>  
> +void raw_irqentry_exit_cond_resched(void)
> +{
> +	if (!preempt_count()) {
> +		if (need_resched() && arm64_preempt_schedule_irq())
> +			preempt_schedule_irq();
> +	}
> +}
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_PREEMPT_DYNAMIC
> +DEFINE_STATIC_KEY_TRUE(sk_dynamic_irqentry_exit_cond_resched);
> +void dynamic_irqentry_exit_cond_resched(void)
> +{
> +	if (!static_branch_unlikely(&sk_dynamic_irqentry_exit_cond_resched))
> +		return;
> +	raw_irqentry_exit_cond_resched();
> +}
> +#endif
> +
>  static __always_inline void __el1_irq(struct pt_regs *regs,
>  				      void (*handler)(struct pt_regs *))
>  {
> @@ -681,10 +688,8 @@ static __always_inline void __el1_irq(struct pt_regs *regs,
>  	do_interrupt_handler(regs, handler);
>  	irq_exit_rcu();
>  
> -	if (!preempt_count() && need_resched()) {
> -		if (arm64_preempt_schedule_irq())
> -			preempt_schedule_irq();
> -	}
> +	if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PREEMPTION))
> +		irqentry_exit_cond_resched();
>  
>  	exit_to_kernel_mode(regs, state);
>  }
> diff --git a/kernel/entry/common.c b/kernel/entry/common.c
> index b82032777310..4aa9656fa1b4 100644
> --- a/kernel/entry/common.c
> +++ b/kernel/entry/common.c
> @@ -142,6 +142,20 @@ noinstr irqentry_state_t irqentry_enter(struct pt_regs *regs)
>  	return ret;
>  }
>  
> +/**
> + * arch_irqentry_exit_need_resched - Architecture specific need resched function
> + *
> + * Invoked from raw_irqentry_exit_cond_resched() to check if need resched.
> + * Defaults return true.
> + *
> + * The main purpose is to permit arch to skip preempt a task from an IRQ.
> + */
> +static inline bool arch_irqentry_exit_need_resched(void);
> +
> +#ifndef arch_irqentry_exit_need_resched
> +static inline bool arch_irqentry_exit_need_resched(void) { return true; }
> +#endif
> +
>  void raw_irqentry_exit_cond_resched(void)
>  {
>  	if (!preempt_count()) {
> @@ -149,7 +163,7 @@ void raw_irqentry_exit_cond_resched(void)
>  		rcu_irq_exit_check_preempt();
>  		if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DEBUG_ENTRY))
>  			WARN_ON_ONCE(!on_thread_stack());
> -		if (need_resched())
> +		if (need_resched() && arch_irqentry_exit_need_resched())
>  			preempt_schedule_irq();
>  	}
>  }
> -- 
> 2.34.1
> 


  parent reply	other threads:[~2025-08-12 16:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-07-29  1:54 [PATCH -next v7 0/7] arm64: entry: Convert to generic irq entry Jinjie Ruan
2025-07-29  1:54 ` [PATCH -next v7 1/7] arm64: ptrace: Replace interrupts_enabled() with regs_irqs_disabled() Jinjie Ruan
2025-08-05 15:05   ` Ada Couprie Diaz
2025-08-06  2:31     ` Jinjie Ruan
2025-07-29  1:54 ` [PATCH -next v7 2/7] arm64: entry: Refactor the entry and exit for exceptions from EL1 Jinjie Ruan
2025-08-05 15:06   ` Ada Couprie Diaz
2025-08-06  2:49     ` Jinjie Ruan
2025-08-11 16:01       ` Ada Couprie Diaz
2025-08-12 11:01   ` Mark Rutland
2025-07-29  1:54 ` [PATCH -next v7 3/7] arm64: entry: Rework arm64_preempt_schedule_irq() Jinjie Ruan
2025-08-05 15:06   ` Ada Couprie Diaz
2025-07-29  1:54 ` [PATCH -next v7 4/7] arm64: entry: Use preempt_count() and need_resched() helper Jinjie Ruan
2025-08-05 15:06   ` Ada Couprie Diaz
2025-07-29  1:54 ` [PATCH -next v7 5/7] arm64: entry: Refactor preempt_schedule_irq() check code Jinjie Ruan
2025-08-05 15:06   ` Ada Couprie Diaz
2025-08-06  6:26     ` Jinjie Ruan
2025-08-06  6:39     ` Jinjie Ruan
2025-08-11 16:02       ` Ada Couprie Diaz
2025-08-11 16:02   ` Ada Couprie Diaz
2025-08-14  8:49     ` Jinjie Ruan
2025-08-12 11:13   ` Mark Rutland [this message]
2025-08-14  9:31     ` Jinjie Ruan
2025-07-29  1:54 ` [PATCH -next v7 6/7] arm64: entry: Move arm64_preempt_schedule_irq() into __exit_to_kernel_mode() Jinjie Ruan
2025-08-05 15:07   ` Ada Couprie Diaz
2025-07-29  1:54 ` [PATCH -next v7 7/7] arm64: entry: Switch to generic IRQ entry Jinjie Ruan
2025-08-05 15:07   ` Ada Couprie Diaz
2025-08-06  6:59     ` Jinjie Ruan
2025-08-05 15:08 ` [PATCH -next v7 0/7] arm64: entry: Convert to generic irq entry Ada Couprie Diaz
2025-08-06  8:11   ` Jinjie Ruan
2025-08-11 16:03     ` Ada Couprie Diaz
2025-08-14  9:37       ` Jinjie Ruan
2025-08-12 11:19 ` Mark Rutland
2025-08-14  9:39   ` Jinjie Ruan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=aJsh5oM3CoUELkvY@J2N7QTR9R3 \
    --to=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=anshuman.khandual@arm.com \
    --cc=ardb@kernel.org \
    --cc=broonie@kernel.org \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=chenl311@chinatelecom.cn \
    --cc=kristina.martsenko@arm.com \
    --cc=leitao@debian.org \
    --cc=liaochang1@huawei.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mbenes@suse.cz \
    --cc=oleg@redhat.com \
    --cc=puranjay@kernel.org \
    --cc=ruanjinjie@huawei.com \
    --cc=ryan.roberts@arm.com \
    --cc=sstabellini@kernel.org \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox