From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C0885CA0EED for ; Tue, 19 Aug 2025 09:17:59 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender:List-Subscribe:List-Help :List-Post:List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:MIME-Version:References:Message-ID: Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=MbRwUwSVxIDKaU2ICHfP9PGzrzs5sHm6FHEsPrlF9D0=; b=Wra7j9uZi43jkk52Dgdd4N2Eiy xw20tSWIazf4YmwPX5uLfi/3rFKFp5HvRSPs6pfWHots8C8q5t+QiXs9w1p16LUb6zu+Z/l3CjkjM 3AEWUvbaBsQswC0uoZc55pKt/3B5WriepJQ95cwpR/Pd74f4WceIucNrPNgKu0zohrB2Fdkz3Krl+ Ph+2qfp31YcF/rTAACyEX2cSDnY+QPUUrmLj5Mcno1qTvWiedVGawjqXcPEDLh3lsO3j5oRpuMw2S cY2zypecOWS/25QtElfSU9iLATE4zTT51MZvALOYlqx7EHzE/OQJg/j13vjUtRrCyxVh5cs5GnEP1 RMAqvbYQ==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.98.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1uoITZ-00000009vUM-16RM; Tue, 19 Aug 2025 09:17:53 +0000 Received: from sea.source.kernel.org ([172.234.252.31]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.98.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1uoHwx-00000009qD9-3ax8 for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Tue, 19 Aug 2025 08:44:12 +0000 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (transwarp.subspace.kernel.org [100.75.92.58]) by sea.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CC22416A4; Tue, 19 Aug 2025 08:44:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D5BF8C4CEF1; Tue, 19 Aug 2025 08:44:09 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2025 09:44:07 +0100 From: Catalin Marinas To: Sebastian Reichel Cc: Arnd Bergmann , soc@lists.linux.dev, Will Deacon , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, kernel@collabora.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: exclude defconfig from ARM64 PORT Message-ID: References: <20250818-arm64-defconfig-v1-1-f589553c3d72@collabora.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20250818-arm64-defconfig-v1-1-f589553c3d72@collabora.com> X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20250819_014411_911717_DB3FD540 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 12.91 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Mon, Aug 18, 2025 at 11:08:04PM +0200, Sebastian Reichel wrote: > Patches for the arm64 defconfig are supposed to be sent to the > SoC maintainers (e.g. a change in the generic arm64 defconfig > required for Rockchip devices should be send to Heiko Stübner > as he is listed as maintainer for "ARM/Rockchip SoC support") > and not the ARM64 PORT maintainers. > > While we cannot easily describe this in MAINTAINERS, we can at > least stop it from giving false information and make it behave > the same way as for the MAINTAINERS file itself (which basically > has the same rules), so that it just outputs the LKML for the > ARM64 defconfig. > > Signed-off-by: Sebastian Reichel Acked-by: Catalin Marinas