From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B3705CA0EF8 for ; Thu, 21 Aug 2025 10:34:36 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender:List-Subscribe:List-Help :List-Post:List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:Content-Type: MIME-Version:References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=Se5i0gKbUrWCIYSdrKXdLZXGNqrXLN6XmUsxzvt8S+U=; b=tYb8xT0ofHAFo0kqau2zU2rZ7X LP6P6chEowkQpewtuImaTjkf/2KXm/ACZygTPOuVd26vDsexC8wv7K5lWOBeGNgtesVDz8Kg6awza i8BJ6UPcS3XSSSv8oaNDoYwkh0gdjRWUQF9IBI6dt7Vi15QwwLVKaaJefwW1NTO5H6ggYJp5/s9WP VVYDwH2kQ8WfKlaiLIuaHL9sufi/2G+CyzUXeIUzYClmClG4Jv7/XnkEpQVkdOp6yRqSnwDTR0Nmz ZUXfLa+AshYQZsSCQDWny3I0FBDfZ0A2GW9lcXX9yhEQ8thuPjmwrFfj6yP2OUR1ZpqMPgs4fRSvh /o61PZ6Q==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.98.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1up2cp-0000000GdFO-1Y7z; Thu, 21 Aug 2025 10:34:31 +0000 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.110.172]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.98.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1up0od-0000000GHMm-1y73 for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Thu, 21 Aug 2025 08:38:36 +0000 Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F9F2168F; Thu, 21 Aug 2025 01:38:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pluto (usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com [172.31.20.19]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B5D673F63F; Thu, 21 Aug 2025 01:38:32 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2025 09:38:30 +0100 From: Cristian Marussi To: Dan Carpenter Cc: Sudeep Holla , AKASHI Takahiro , Michal Simek , Cristian Marussi , Linus Walleij , arm-scmi@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC v2 4/7] pinctrl-scmi: add PIN_CONFIG_INPUT_VALUE Message-ID: References: <6f732f53-7e00-4f0d-82a3-480bc81497bd@sabinyo.mountain> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <6f732f53-7e00-4f0d-82a3-480bc81497bd@sabinyo.mountain> X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20250821_013835_545385_0D89D459 X-CRM114-Status: UNSURE ( 8.92 ) X-CRM114-Notice: Please train this message. X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Sun, Jul 20, 2025 at 02:38:59PM -0500, Dan Carpenter wrote: > In SCMI the value of the pin is just another configuration option. Add > this as an option in the pin_config_param enum and creating a mapping to > SCMI_PIN_INPUT_VALUE in pinctrl_scmi_map_pinconf_type() If this is the case, should not this commit have also a Fixes tag ? Cheers, Cristian