From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0A5E2CAC582 for ; Tue, 9 Sep 2025 17:20:20 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender:List-Subscribe:List-Help :List-Post:List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:MIME-Version:References:Message-ID: Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=RqxBp5GqUYy1vuvyW4xHhGZiROziN1Tf6UuwRZIay/o=; b=4x2mLR8zr38vepk52HiAWRuWmH tLYtOSaToc6qv6e22SwMy5pf2oTi6sEEqGZSc/17dZkx+eZ1ssg68BTceLsW8j1EJoOlg1nmrw6N8 gnQHy1Eo1usZ3COFYT+GkcziTCnVzYUxoPPKKVGNK4gTi/+PIVhwekY31rk7CkywVsINPiFB8KK3W TZw7mjoMoDFKIemXA8hfy6DAVjzJq0e7+PNDfRjNj1SwYYGhevlU0p8Deikx2bhQrnygk6hNMbJRu n06ChuiJVjeS9s0TK9JORV9iO2K4XxOohCPhUD0R2v6alg7yEYUwN9u2ria2RcAbQ+QXEW7H5A/uZ dbUJd03w==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.98.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1uw20q-00000008vhq-2QoB; Tue, 09 Sep 2025 17:20:12 +0000 Received: from mgamail.intel.com ([198.175.65.11]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.98.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1uvypc-00000007YZw-2CNu; Tue, 09 Sep 2025 13:56:25 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1757426185; x=1788962185; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to; bh=g/QqtRMuBql/lAp+Wpk1UAHBNS5otc0roGKqOnIPLHk=; b=Bd6brfpgte5USq04G7FKZeMq7ZNLex4b8+9D3MQOwTdNEw1Ln0adlycr oMAtN1YSDQbDy9FGLP+g6Z74QB4iSI5/u6aGWTTUDNzvy511W/V+tw4tc x7m2lv5fSJr/voSDsN1wrDwJEbIxl7NXYdslSLP9nCtWDgmZW30zDc9pP U08dY1EaJISWWZZu8N7PfLzXrl3OedUxq0xn0ScfP8edguGpPP11+p7C4 VflN9fbtCiaS1oN/MZP23ezVyp/+dQKw7pUDxvWrLtMEX5du3C3tTefIb AWCbLe8t2a4h+0nJ6hwykkshhmx4vEjf4IFr+Egw0p+weCFbbl+k9gllU A==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: 1BXFm5xRQnOg6LDboHm2Xg== X-CSE-MsgGUID: M8Pt/czLRoy+AcnbYNw3Fg== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6800,10657,11548"; a="69964137" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.18,251,1751266800"; d="scan'208";a="69964137" Received: from orviesa007.jf.intel.com ([10.64.159.147]) by orvoesa103.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 09 Sep 2025 06:56:21 -0700 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: ks5yNBpNSuKS3BFnVbhH5w== X-CSE-MsgGUID: P7SuEn8mRlSdRZ+kBu7loA== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.18,251,1751266800"; d="scan'208";a="172963735" Received: from smile.fi.intel.com ([10.237.72.51]) by orviesa007.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 09 Sep 2025 06:56:16 -0700 Received: from andy by smile.fi.intel.com with local (Exim 4.98.2) (envelope-from ) id 1uvypQ-00000001UyO-2aQ3; Tue, 09 Sep 2025 16:56:12 +0300 Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2025 16:56:12 +0300 From: Andy Shevchenko To: Bartosz Golaszewski Cc: Linus Walleij , Keguang Zhang , Alban Bedel , Doug Berger , Florian Fainelli , Broadcom internal kernel review list , Matthias Brugger , AngeloGioacchino Del Regno , Paul Walmsley , Samuel Holland , Yixun Lan , Andy Shevchenko , linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, spacemit@lists.linux.dev, Bartosz Golaszewski Subject: Re: [PATCH 13/15] gpio: sodaville: use new generic GPIO chip API Message-ID: References: <20250909-gpio-mmio-gpio-conv-part4-v1-0-9f723dc3524a@linaro.org> <20250909-gpio-mmio-gpio-conv-part4-v1-13-9f723dc3524a@linaro.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - c/o Alberga Business Park, 6 krs, Bertel Jungin Aukio 5, 02600 Espoo X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20250909_065624_601175_B11A51D6 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 35.55 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Tue, Sep 09, 2025 at 04:47:09PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > On Tue, Sep 09, 2025 at 04:45:31PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > On Tue, Sep 09, 2025 at 08:24:23AM -0500, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote: > > > On Tue, 9 Sep 2025 15:13:04 +0200, Andy Shevchenko > > > said: > > > > On Tue, Sep 09, 2025 at 01:35:04PM +0200, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote: > > > >> On Tue, Sep 9, 2025 at 1:31 PM Andy Shevchenko > > > >> wrote: > > > >> > On Tue, Sep 09, 2025 at 11:15:40AM +0200, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote: ... > > > >> > > + config = (typeof(config)){ > > > >> > > > > >> > This looks unusual. Why can't properly formed compound literal be used as in > > > >> > many other places in the kernel? > > > >> > > > >> It is correct C > > > > > > > > If it compiles, it doesn't mean it's correct C, it might be non-standard. > > > > Have you checked with the standard (note, I read that part in the past, > > > > but I may forgot the details, so I don't know the answer to this)? > > > > > > It's a GNU extension alright > > > > clang, I suppose, also okay with this? > > > > > but it's supported in the kernel as it evaluates > > > to a simple cast. > > > > There is no cast. And that's make a big difference to what the code tries to do. > > > > > >> and checkpatch doesn't raise any warnings. > > > > > > > > checkpatch is far from being useful in the questions like this. > > > > It false positively complains for for_each*() macros all over > > > > the kernel, for example. > > > > > > > >> It's the > > > >> same kind of argument as between kmalloc(sizeof(struct foo)) vs > > > >> kmalloc(sizeof(f)). > > > > > > > > Maybe, but it introduces a new style while all other cases use the other, > > > > _established_ style. So we have a precedent and the form the code is written > > > > in is against the de facto usage of the compound literals. > > > > > > It may not be *very* common but it's hardly new style: > > > > I think your statement is incorrect see below why. > > > > > $ git grep -P "\(typeof\(.*\)\) ?\{" | wc > > > 108 529 7315 > > > > Not correct. The correct output will be closer to > > > > $ git grep -l -P "\(typeof\(.*\)\) ?\{" | wc -l > > 15 > > > > And if you looked at the output carefully, you see the bug in the RE you used. > > > > So, even closer will be this one: > > > > $ git grep -l -P "=[[:space:]]+\(typeof\(.*\)\) ?\{" | wc -l > > 7 > > > > 2 out of which are related to libeth, effectively makes this 6. And for of fullness the picture: $ git grep -l -P "=[[:space:]]+\(struct [^[:space:]]*\) ?\{" | wc -l 501 So, it's 1:100 ratio. > TBH, I think those 6 all made the same mistake, i.e. thinking of the compound > literal as a cast. Which is not! > > > No, this is completely non-standard and unusual thing in the kernel. > > > > > >> I guess it's personal taste but I like this version better. > > > > > > > > In kernel we also try to be consistent. This add inconsistency. Am I wrong? > > > > > > > >> > > + .dev = &pdev->dev, > > > >> > > + .sz = 4, > > > >> > > + .dat = sd->gpio_pub_base + GPINR, > > > >> > > + .set = sd->gpio_pub_base + GPOUTR, > > > >> > > + .dirout = sd->gpio_pub_base + GPOER, > > > >> > > + }; -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko