From: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>
To: Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>
Cc: Bjorn Andersson <andersson@kernel.org>,
Shawn Guo <shawnguo@kernel.org>,
Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>,
Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@pengutronix.de>,
Fabio Estevam <festevam@gmail.com>,
Daniel Baluta <daniel.baluta@nxp.com>,
Frank Li <frank.li@nxp.com>,
Hiago De Franco <hiago.franco@toradex.com>,
linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org, imx@lists.linux.dev,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/6] remoteproc: imx_rproc: Clean up after ops introduction
Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2025 10:15:50 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aMBStih6Wi_isn2N@p14s> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250908-imx-rproc-cleanup-v1-6-e838cb14436c@nxp.com>
On Mon, Sep 08, 2025 at 09:07:39PM +0800, Peng Fan wrote:
> With the switch-case in imx_rproc_{start,stop}{} removed, simplify
> the code logic by removing 'goto'. The last switch-case in
> imx_rproc_detect_mode() are no longer needed and can be removed.
>
> This cleanup improves code readability and aligns with the new ops-based
> design.
>
> No functional changes.
>
> Signed-off-by: Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>
> ---
> drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c | 25 +++++++------------------
> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c b/drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c
> index 5fa729f4286f6ac939357c32fef41d7d97e5f860..ed8395b097d07d02e5323550ff497819f9b95ad6 100644
> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c
> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c
> @@ -323,14 +323,11 @@ static int imx_rproc_start(struct rproc *rproc)
> if (ret)
> return ret;
>
> - if (dcfg->ops && dcfg->ops->start) {
> + if (dcfg->ops && dcfg->ops->start)
> ret = dcfg->ops->start(rproc);
> - goto start_ret;
> - }
> -
> - return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> + else
> + return -EOPNOTSUPP;
Here I would simply refactor this to:
if (!dcfg->ops || !dcfg->ops_start)
return -EONOTSUPP;
Otherwise this patchset is going in the right direction.
Thanks,
Mathieu
>
> -start_ret:
> if (ret)
> dev_err(dev, "Failed to enable remote core!\n");
>
> @@ -380,14 +377,11 @@ static int imx_rproc_stop(struct rproc *rproc)
> struct device *dev = priv->dev;
> int ret;
>
> - if (dcfg->ops && dcfg->ops->stop) {
> + if (dcfg->ops && dcfg->ops->stop)
> ret = dcfg->ops->stop(rproc);
> - goto stop_ret;
> - }
> -
> - return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> + else
> + return -EOPNOTSUPP;
>
> -stop_ret:
> if (ret)
> dev_err(dev, "Failed to stop remote core\n");
> else
> @@ -1000,13 +994,8 @@ static int imx_rproc_detect_mode(struct imx_rproc *priv)
> if (dcfg->ops && dcfg->ops->detect_mode)
> return dcfg->ops->detect_mode(priv->rproc);
>
> - switch (dcfg->method) {
> - case IMX_RPROC_NONE:
> + if (dcfg->method == IMX_RPROC_NONE)
> priv->rproc->state = RPROC_DETACHED;
> - return 0;
> - default:
> - break;
> - }
>
> return 0;
> }
>
> --
> 2.37.1
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-09-09 18:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-09-08 13:07 [PATCH 0/6] remoteproc: imx_proc: Simplify driver by removing the switch-case Peng Fan
2025-09-08 13:07 ` [PATCH 1/6] remoteproc: imx_rproc: Introduce start/stop/detect_mode ops for imx_rproc_dcfg Peng Fan
2025-09-08 14:54 ` Frank Li
2025-09-08 13:07 ` [PATCH 2/6] remoteproc: imx_rproc: Move imx_rproc_dcfg closer to imx_rproc_of_match Peng Fan
2025-09-08 14:55 ` Frank Li
2025-09-08 13:07 ` [PATCH 3/6] remoteproc: imx_rproc: Simplify IMX_RPROC_MMIO switch case Peng Fan
2025-09-08 14:57 ` Frank Li
2025-09-08 13:07 ` [PATCH 4/6] remoteproc: imx_rproc: Simplify IMX_RPROC_SCU_API " Peng Fan
2025-09-08 14:59 ` Frank Li
2025-09-08 13:07 ` [PATCH 5/6] remoteproc: imx_rproc: Simplify IMX_RPROC_SMC " Peng Fan
2025-09-08 15:02 ` Frank Li
2025-09-08 13:07 ` [PATCH 6/6] remoteproc: imx_rproc: Clean up after ops introduction Peng Fan
2025-09-08 15:03 ` Frank Li
2025-09-09 3:52 ` Peng Fan
2025-09-09 16:15 ` Mathieu Poirier [this message]
2025-09-09 3:53 ` [PATCH 0/6] remoteproc: imx_proc: Simplify driver by removing the switch-case Peng Fan
2025-09-09 12:08 ` Daniel Baluta
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aMBStih6Wi_isn2N@p14s \
--to=mathieu.poirier@linaro.org \
--cc=andersson@kernel.org \
--cc=daniel.baluta@nxp.com \
--cc=festevam@gmail.com \
--cc=frank.li@nxp.com \
--cc=hiago.franco@toradex.com \
--cc=imx@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=kernel@pengutronix.de \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peng.fan@nxp.com \
--cc=s.hauer@pengutronix.de \
--cc=shawnguo@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).