From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 87BAACAC598 for ; Tue, 16 Sep 2025 12:53:38 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender:List-Subscribe:List-Help :List-Post:List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:Content-Type: MIME-Version:References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=9wxU0snakUh0UqJ/kOudQ3ZsPKdVElU9LzUfnZ0C2HY=; b=JfZ8iZZoke9GJXUN4ZwnguN83D 8lbi6uBhuqyHklGoMjvLr00BY2fqBNu5+zKaaF1OTgJR0aaVtX7X/KMWE0cF65RBEQKXXl6gwKi+K nDeFa9UYi2MlJKGMUm/EbsgVlwvt1m2kHr4mVE0uv5yjr54PdqrgjQqmXSPtH+AlViHdyuJlLB/Zb ts6Xgp+gROVfH94rnLx2wOSmQcYDwWuafm4ImiG9LF8s4zzjn9NAS+o+qzihXS2WR03lVfCUZtjut C7eruSQsp4RupJ9B1fb2OMEmhqqYTq+BZuB5E8x5av1WhQbWlYvMeTDwFOiW7tmYtQ8tN3At52SRD 0stps+Nw==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.98.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1uyVBZ-00000007pxG-3Hjj; Tue, 16 Sep 2025 12:53:29 +0000 Received: from tor.source.kernel.org ([172.105.4.254]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.98.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1uyVBY-00000007pwx-3LEs for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Tue, 16 Sep 2025 12:53:28 +0000 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (transwarp.subspace.kernel.org [100.75.92.58]) by tor.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 34E9860143; Tue, 16 Sep 2025 12:53:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5EF14C4CEEB; Tue, 16 Sep 2025 12:53:25 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2025 13:53:22 +0100 From: Catalin Marinas To: Yeoreum Yun Cc: will@kernel.org, broonie@kernel.org, maz@kernel.org, oliver.upton@linux.dev, joey.gouly@arm.com, james.morse@arm.com, ardb@kernel.org, scott@os.amperecomputing.com, suzuki.poulose@arm.com, yuzenghui@huawei.com, mark.rutland@arm.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, kvmarm@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND v7 4/6] arm64: futex: refactor futex atomic operation Message-ID: References: <20250816151929.197589-1-yeoreum.yun@arm.com> <20250816151929.197589-5-yeoreum.yun@arm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Mon, Sep 15, 2025 at 11:34:07PM +0100, Yeoreum Yun wrote: > with selftest's futex testcase, I've tested. > But Since there is no test for each operation even in LTP, > I tested it with additional test from me. As a separate series, you may improve the futex kselftest to cover all the cases. -- Catalin