From: Yeoreum Yun <yeoreum.yun@arm.com>
To: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Cc: catalin.marinas@arm.com, will@kernel.org, broonie@kernel.org,
maz@kernel.org, oliver.upton@linux.dev, joey.gouly@arm.com,
james.morse@arm.com, ardb@kernel.org,
scott@os.amperecomputing.com, suzuki.poulose@arm.com,
yuzenghui@huawei.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
kvmarm@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 5/5] arm64: futex: support futex with FEAT_LSUI
Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2025 15:07:05 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aMrAic2NbXTDsctJ@e129823.arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aMq-VKIo-tYoGRSz@J2N7QTR9R3>
Hi Mark,
[...]
> > > FIELD_MODIFY(GENMASK_U64(31, 0), &oval64, oldval);
> > > FIELD_MODIFY(GENMASK_U64(31, 0), &nval64, newval);
> > > } else {
> > > FIELD_MODIFY(GENMASK_U64(63, 32), &oval64, oldval);
> > > FIELD_MODIFY(GENMASK_U64(63, 32), &nval64, newval);
> > > }
> > > orig64 = oval64;
> > >
> > > if (__lsui_cmpxchg64(uaddr_al, &oval64, nval64))
> > > return -EFAULT;
> > >
> > > if (oval64 != orig64)
> > > return -EAGAIN;
> > >
> > > *oval = oldval;
> > > return 0;
> > > }
> >
> > Hmm I think this wouldn'b cover the case below when big-endianess used.
> >
> > struct {
> > u32 others 0x55667788;
> > u32 futex = 0x11223344;
> > };
> >
> > In this case, memory layout would be:
> >
> > 55 66 77 88 11 22 33 44
> >
> > So, the value of fetched oval64 is 0x5566778811223344;
>
> Ok, so the entire struct is aligned to 8 bytes, and the 'futex' field is
> 4 bytes after that (and not itself aligned to 8 bytes). In that case:
[...]
Sorry and thanks for explation. I've misread the condition as
if (IS_ALIGNED(uaddr, sizeof(64) && IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_CPU_LITTLE_ENDIAN)
Again. sorry for my bad eyes :\
[...]
--
Sincerely,
Yeoreum Yun
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-09-17 14:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-09-17 11:08 [PATCH v8 0/5] support FEAT_LSUI and apply it on futex atomic ops Yeoreum Yun
2025-09-17 11:08 ` [PATCH v8 1/5] arm64: cpufeature: add FEAT_LSUI Yeoreum Yun
2025-09-17 11:08 ` [PATCH v8 2/5] KVM: arm64: expose FEAT_LSUI to guest Yeoreum Yun
2025-09-17 11:08 ` [PATCH v8 3/5] arm64: Kconfig: Detect toolchain support for LSUI Yeoreum Yun
2025-09-17 11:08 ` [PATCH v8 4/5] arm64: futex: refactor futex atomic operation Yeoreum Yun
2025-09-17 11:08 ` [PATCH v8 5/5] arm64: futex: support futex with FEAT_LSUI Yeoreum Yun
2025-09-17 12:57 ` Yeoreum Yun
2025-09-17 13:04 ` Mark Rutland
2025-09-17 13:35 ` Yeoreum Yun
2025-09-17 13:57 ` Mark Rutland
2025-09-17 14:07 ` Yeoreum Yun [this message]
2025-09-18 9:11 ` Yeoreum Yun
2025-09-17 13:42 ` Yeoreum Yun
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aMrAic2NbXTDsctJ@e129823.arm.com \
--to=yeoreum.yun@arm.com \
--cc=ardb@kernel.org \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=james.morse@arm.com \
--cc=joey.gouly@arm.com \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=oliver.upton@linux.dev \
--cc=scott@os.amperecomputing.com \
--cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=yuzenghui@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox