From: Itaru Kitayama <itaru.kitayama@linux.dev>
To: Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev>
Cc: kvmarm@lists.linux.dev, Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>,
Joey Gouly <joey.gouly@arm.com>,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
Zenghui Yu <yuzenghui@huawei.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@linux.ibm.com>,
Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>,
Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@linux.ibm.com>,
David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 07/13] KVM: arm64: selftests: Provide helper for getting default vCPU target
Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2025 06:56:27 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aMsui6JZ0q1z4pSc@vm4> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250917212044.294760-8-oliver.upton@linux.dev>
On Wed, Sep 17, 2025 at 02:20:37PM -0700, Oliver Upton wrote:
> The default vCPU target in KVM selftests is pretty boring in that it
> doesn't enable any vCPU features. Expose a helper for getting the
> default target to prepare for cramming in more features. Call
> KVM_ARM_PREFERRED_TARGET directly from get-reg-list as it needs
> fine-grained control over feature flags.
>
> Signed-off-by: Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev>
> ---
> tools/testing/selftests/kvm/arm64/psci_test.c | 2 +-
> .../testing/selftests/kvm/arm64/smccc_filter.c | 2 +-
> .../selftests/kvm/arm64/vpmu_counter_access.c | 4 ++--
> tools/testing/selftests/kvm/get-reg-list.c | 9 ++++++---
> .../selftests/kvm/include/arm64/processor.h | 2 ++
> .../testing/selftests/kvm/lib/arm64/processor.c | 17 +++++++++++------
> 6 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/arm64/psci_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/arm64/psci_test.c
> index cf208390fd0e..0d4680da66d1 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/arm64/psci_test.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/arm64/psci_test.c
> @@ -89,7 +89,7 @@ static struct kvm_vm *setup_vm(void *guest_code, struct kvm_vcpu **source,
>
> vm = vm_create(2);
>
> - vm_ioctl(vm, KVM_ARM_PREFERRED_TARGET, &init);
> + kvm_get_default_vcpu_target(vm, &init);
> init.features[0] |= (1 << KVM_ARM_VCPU_PSCI_0_2);
>
> *source = aarch64_vcpu_add(vm, 0, &init, guest_code);
I wonder if the ioctl() can be called unconditionally in the
aarch64_vcpu_add() function. If the intention is that the kvm selftest
code needs to write this way I am fine with that.
Reviewed-by: Itaru Kitayama <itaru.kitayama@fujitsu.com>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/arm64/smccc_filter.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/arm64/smccc_filter.c
> index eb5551d21dbe..a8e22d866ea7 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/arm64/smccc_filter.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/arm64/smccc_filter.c
> @@ -64,7 +64,7 @@ static struct kvm_vm *setup_vm(struct kvm_vcpu **vcpu)
> struct kvm_vm *vm;
>
> vm = vm_create(1);
> - vm_ioctl(vm, KVM_ARM_PREFERRED_TARGET, &init);
> + kvm_get_default_vcpu_target(vm, &init);
>
> /*
> * Enable in-kernel emulation of PSCI to ensure that calls are denied
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/arm64/vpmu_counter_access.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/arm64/vpmu_counter_access.c
> index 36a3a8b4e0b5..2a8f31c8e59f 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/arm64/vpmu_counter_access.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/arm64/vpmu_counter_access.c
> @@ -430,7 +430,7 @@ static void create_vpmu_vm(void *guest_code)
> }
>
> /* Create vCPU with PMUv3 */
> - vm_ioctl(vpmu_vm.vm, KVM_ARM_PREFERRED_TARGET, &init);
> + kvm_get_default_vcpu_target(vpmu_vm.vm, &init);
> init.features[0] |= (1 << KVM_ARM_VCPU_PMU_V3);
> vpmu_vm.vcpu = aarch64_vcpu_add(vpmu_vm.vm, 0, &init, guest_code);
> vcpu_init_descriptor_tables(vpmu_vm.vcpu);
> @@ -525,7 +525,7 @@ static void run_access_test(uint64_t pmcr_n)
> * Reset and re-initialize the vCPU, and run the guest code again to
> * check if PMCR_EL0.N is preserved.
> */
> - vm_ioctl(vpmu_vm.vm, KVM_ARM_PREFERRED_TARGET, &init);
> + kvm_get_default_vcpu_target(vpmu_vm.vm, &init);
> init.features[0] |= (1 << KVM_ARM_VCPU_PMU_V3);
> aarch64_vcpu_setup(vcpu, &init);
> vcpu_init_descriptor_tables(vcpu);
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/get-reg-list.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/get-reg-list.c
> index 91f05f78e824..f4644c9d2d3b 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/get-reg-list.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/get-reg-list.c
> @@ -116,10 +116,13 @@ void __weak finalize_vcpu(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct vcpu_reg_list *c)
> }
>
> #ifdef __aarch64__
> -static void prepare_vcpu_init(struct vcpu_reg_list *c, struct kvm_vcpu_init *init)
> +static void prepare_vcpu_init(struct kvm_vm *vm, struct vcpu_reg_list *c,
> + struct kvm_vcpu_init *init)
> {
> struct vcpu_reg_sublist *s;
>
> + vm_ioctl(vm, KVM_ARM_PREFERRED_TARGET, init);
> +
> for_each_sublist(c, s)
> if (s->capability)
> init->features[s->feature / 32] |= 1 << (s->feature % 32);
> @@ -127,10 +130,10 @@ static void prepare_vcpu_init(struct vcpu_reg_list *c, struct kvm_vcpu_init *ini
>
> static struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu_config_get_vcpu(struct vcpu_reg_list *c, struct kvm_vm *vm)
> {
> - struct kvm_vcpu_init init = { .target = -1, };
> + struct kvm_vcpu_init init;
> struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu;
>
> - prepare_vcpu_init(c, &init);
> + prepare_vcpu_init(vm, c, &init);
> vcpu = __vm_vcpu_add(vm, 0);
> aarch64_vcpu_setup(vcpu, &init);
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/arm64/processor.h b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/arm64/processor.h
> index 5a4b29c1b965..87f50efed720 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/arm64/processor.h
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/arm64/processor.h
> @@ -357,4 +357,6 @@ static __always_inline u64 ctxt_reg_alias(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 encoding)
> return KVM_ARM64_SYS_REG(alias);
> }
>
> +void kvm_get_default_vcpu_target(struct kvm_vm *vm, struct kvm_vcpu_init *init);
> +
> #endif /* SELFTEST_KVM_PROCESSOR_H */
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/arm64/processor.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/arm64/processor.c
> index 311660a9f655..5ae65fefd48c 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/arm64/processor.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/arm64/processor.c
> @@ -267,19 +267,24 @@ void virt_arch_dump(FILE *stream, struct kvm_vm *vm, uint8_t indent)
> }
> }
>
> +void kvm_get_default_vcpu_target(struct kvm_vm *vm, struct kvm_vcpu_init *init)
> +{
> + struct kvm_vcpu_init preferred = {};
> +
> + vm_ioctl(vm, KVM_ARM_PREFERRED_TARGET, &preferred);
> +
> + *init = preferred;
> +}
> +
> void aarch64_vcpu_setup(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_vcpu_init *init)
> {
> struct kvm_vcpu_init default_init = { .target = -1, };
> struct kvm_vm *vm = vcpu->vm;
> uint64_t sctlr_el1, tcr_el1, ttbr0_el1;
>
> - if (!init)
> + if (!init) {
> + kvm_get_default_vcpu_target(vm, &default_init);
> init = &default_init;
> -
> - if (init->target == -1) {
> - struct kvm_vcpu_init preferred;
> - vm_ioctl(vm, KVM_ARM_PREFERRED_TARGET, &preferred);
> - init->target = preferred.target;
> }
>
> vcpu_ioctl(vcpu, KVM_ARM_VCPU_INIT, init);
> --
> 2.47.3
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-09-17 21:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-09-17 21:20 [PATCH 00/13] KVM: arm64: selftests: Run selftests in VHE EL2 Oliver Upton
2025-09-17 21:20 ` [PATCH 01/13] KVM: arm64: selftests: Provide kvm_arch_vm_post_create() in library code Oliver Upton
2025-09-18 1:25 ` Itaru Kitayama
2025-09-17 21:20 ` [PATCH 02/13] KVM: arm64: selftests: Initialize VGICv3 only once Oliver Upton
2025-09-18 10:44 ` Zenghui Yu
2025-09-17 21:20 ` [PATCH 03/13] KVM: arm64: selftests: Add helper to check for VGICv3 support Oliver Upton
2025-09-18 1:45 ` Itaru Kitayama
2025-09-17 21:20 ` [PATCH 04/13] KVM: arm64: selftests: Add unsanitised helpers for VGICv3 creation Oliver Upton
2025-09-17 21:20 ` [PATCH 05/13] KVM: arm64: selftests: Create a VGICv3 for 'default' VMs Oliver Upton
2025-09-17 21:20 ` [PATCH 06/13] KVM: arm64: selftests: Alias EL1 registers to EL2 counterparts Oliver Upton
2025-09-17 21:20 ` [PATCH 07/13] KVM: arm64: selftests: Provide helper for getting default vCPU target Oliver Upton
2025-09-17 21:56 ` Itaru Kitayama [this message]
2025-09-17 22:00 ` Oliver Upton
2025-09-17 21:20 ` [PATCH 08/13] KVM: arm64: selftests: Select SMCCC conduit based on current EL Oliver Upton
2025-09-17 21:20 ` [PATCH 09/13] KVM: arm64: selftests: Use hyp timer IRQs when test runs at EL2 Oliver Upton
2025-09-17 21:20 ` [PATCH 10/13] KVM: arm64: selftests: Use the vCPU attr for setting nr of PMU counters Oliver Upton
2025-09-17 21:20 ` [PATCH 11/13] KVM: arm64: selftests: Initialize HCR_EL2 Oliver Upton
2025-09-17 21:20 ` [PATCH 12/13] KVM: arm64: selftests: Enable EL2 by default Oliver Upton
2025-09-17 21:20 ` [PATCH 13/13] KVM: arm64: selftests: Add basic test for running in VHE EL2 Oliver Upton
2025-09-24 18:37 ` [PATCH 00/13] KVM: arm64: selftests: Run selftests " Marc Zyngier
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aMsui6JZ0q1z4pSc@vm4 \
--to=itaru.kitayama@linux.dev \
--cc=borntraeger@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=frankja@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=imbrenda@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=joey.gouly@arm.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=oliver.upton@linux.dev \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
--cc=yuzenghui@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).