From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C1596CAC59A for ; Wed, 17 Sep 2025 21:59:06 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender:List-Subscribe:List-Help :List-Post:List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:Content-Type: MIME-Version:References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=MXZ7+Ibvsh1cXMBq66vw8RmPmdICgys8MaS/4a4cgSE=; b=p/Bajtzh9dRerAJDiBgh1dpj23 K8XyM+pm+5Ln82HAN+uPKy4wZSSd9Ww203n5q2RVz15wsGSSDsicZbmUm6cIIHIUXZw70Ii+wWkEt Qai29N3X14CTYzkGVpgtlSj2onOlA/zC53Gv+Yq7FJO4a6r/2EAsir7Yf0N8s34c5zERhxVtBGvGQ aQaAdKz+mxXpm2rimkjerke2JexQ9mQM0qUL3x44GONJx9Crc4+DiT6sOQro7hEkZXahNLHJrUnSx Ey7wRdqKBcLOQiD9nQpVcl2pPZuZV+F6uBDGG7XCwIFLQJobPSYGjnm5yWq4uQLTUyfpUVagfzXd4 ecJWWxfQ==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.98.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1uz0B0-0000000F4s5-0hX7; Wed, 17 Sep 2025 21:58:58 +0000 Received: from out-185.mta0.migadu.com ([91.218.175.185]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.98.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1uz0Ax-0000000F4BY-0Rs1 for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Wed, 17 Sep 2025 21:58:56 +0000 Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2025 06:56:27 +0900 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linux.dev; s=key1; t=1758146199; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=MXZ7+Ibvsh1cXMBq66vw8RmPmdICgys8MaS/4a4cgSE=; b=qNRhO/emD7xbps2428sDp6IrSxnPCufvt9GFU3kcjyRVvZv/+Rh7BH6jm+WQFppq1XLJ99 jeu17o6yf4WksZPpOza8BduvHVt8qrsQIHmEtKaodDV5fJ1ygRt5yKfxO7wGJJPuZ9AvlU N+Npk3U3NqcMV2/RnayFLNRolyP7IMg= X-Report-Abuse: Please report any abuse attempt to abuse@migadu.com and include these headers. From: Itaru Kitayama To: Oliver Upton Cc: kvmarm@lists.linux.dev, Marc Zyngier , Joey Gouly , Suzuki K Poulose , Zenghui Yu , Paolo Bonzini , Sean Christopherson , Christian Borntraeger , Janosch Frank , Claudio Imbrenda , David Hildenbrand , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 07/13] KVM: arm64: selftests: Provide helper for getting default vCPU target Message-ID: References: <20250917212044.294760-1-oliver.upton@linux.dev> <20250917212044.294760-8-oliver.upton@linux.dev> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20250917212044.294760-8-oliver.upton@linux.dev> X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_OUT X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20250917_145855_296073_5CCF3FD0 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 23.83 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Wed, Sep 17, 2025 at 02:20:37PM -0700, Oliver Upton wrote: > The default vCPU target in KVM selftests is pretty boring in that it > doesn't enable any vCPU features. Expose a helper for getting the > default target to prepare for cramming in more features. Call > KVM_ARM_PREFERRED_TARGET directly from get-reg-list as it needs > fine-grained control over feature flags. > > Signed-off-by: Oliver Upton > --- > tools/testing/selftests/kvm/arm64/psci_test.c | 2 +- > .../testing/selftests/kvm/arm64/smccc_filter.c | 2 +- > .../selftests/kvm/arm64/vpmu_counter_access.c | 4 ++-- > tools/testing/selftests/kvm/get-reg-list.c | 9 ++++++--- > .../selftests/kvm/include/arm64/processor.h | 2 ++ > .../testing/selftests/kvm/lib/arm64/processor.c | 17 +++++++++++------ > 6 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/arm64/psci_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/arm64/psci_test.c > index cf208390fd0e..0d4680da66d1 100644 > --- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/arm64/psci_test.c > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/arm64/psci_test.c > @@ -89,7 +89,7 @@ static struct kvm_vm *setup_vm(void *guest_code, struct kvm_vcpu **source, > > vm = vm_create(2); > > - vm_ioctl(vm, KVM_ARM_PREFERRED_TARGET, &init); > + kvm_get_default_vcpu_target(vm, &init); > init.features[0] |= (1 << KVM_ARM_VCPU_PSCI_0_2); > > *source = aarch64_vcpu_add(vm, 0, &init, guest_code); I wonder if the ioctl() can be called unconditionally in the aarch64_vcpu_add() function. If the intention is that the kvm selftest code needs to write this way I am fine with that. Reviewed-by: Itaru Kitayama > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/arm64/smccc_filter.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/arm64/smccc_filter.c > index eb5551d21dbe..a8e22d866ea7 100644 > --- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/arm64/smccc_filter.c > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/arm64/smccc_filter.c > @@ -64,7 +64,7 @@ static struct kvm_vm *setup_vm(struct kvm_vcpu **vcpu) > struct kvm_vm *vm; > > vm = vm_create(1); > - vm_ioctl(vm, KVM_ARM_PREFERRED_TARGET, &init); > + kvm_get_default_vcpu_target(vm, &init); > > /* > * Enable in-kernel emulation of PSCI to ensure that calls are denied > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/arm64/vpmu_counter_access.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/arm64/vpmu_counter_access.c > index 36a3a8b4e0b5..2a8f31c8e59f 100644 > --- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/arm64/vpmu_counter_access.c > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/arm64/vpmu_counter_access.c > @@ -430,7 +430,7 @@ static void create_vpmu_vm(void *guest_code) > } > > /* Create vCPU with PMUv3 */ > - vm_ioctl(vpmu_vm.vm, KVM_ARM_PREFERRED_TARGET, &init); > + kvm_get_default_vcpu_target(vpmu_vm.vm, &init); > init.features[0] |= (1 << KVM_ARM_VCPU_PMU_V3); > vpmu_vm.vcpu = aarch64_vcpu_add(vpmu_vm.vm, 0, &init, guest_code); > vcpu_init_descriptor_tables(vpmu_vm.vcpu); > @@ -525,7 +525,7 @@ static void run_access_test(uint64_t pmcr_n) > * Reset and re-initialize the vCPU, and run the guest code again to > * check if PMCR_EL0.N is preserved. > */ > - vm_ioctl(vpmu_vm.vm, KVM_ARM_PREFERRED_TARGET, &init); > + kvm_get_default_vcpu_target(vpmu_vm.vm, &init); > init.features[0] |= (1 << KVM_ARM_VCPU_PMU_V3); > aarch64_vcpu_setup(vcpu, &init); > vcpu_init_descriptor_tables(vcpu); > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/get-reg-list.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/get-reg-list.c > index 91f05f78e824..f4644c9d2d3b 100644 > --- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/get-reg-list.c > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/get-reg-list.c > @@ -116,10 +116,13 @@ void __weak finalize_vcpu(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct vcpu_reg_list *c) > } > > #ifdef __aarch64__ > -static void prepare_vcpu_init(struct vcpu_reg_list *c, struct kvm_vcpu_init *init) > +static void prepare_vcpu_init(struct kvm_vm *vm, struct vcpu_reg_list *c, > + struct kvm_vcpu_init *init) > { > struct vcpu_reg_sublist *s; > > + vm_ioctl(vm, KVM_ARM_PREFERRED_TARGET, init); > + > for_each_sublist(c, s) > if (s->capability) > init->features[s->feature / 32] |= 1 << (s->feature % 32); > @@ -127,10 +130,10 @@ static void prepare_vcpu_init(struct vcpu_reg_list *c, struct kvm_vcpu_init *ini > > static struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu_config_get_vcpu(struct vcpu_reg_list *c, struct kvm_vm *vm) > { > - struct kvm_vcpu_init init = { .target = -1, }; > + struct kvm_vcpu_init init; > struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu; > > - prepare_vcpu_init(c, &init); > + prepare_vcpu_init(vm, c, &init); > vcpu = __vm_vcpu_add(vm, 0); > aarch64_vcpu_setup(vcpu, &init); > > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/arm64/processor.h b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/arm64/processor.h > index 5a4b29c1b965..87f50efed720 100644 > --- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/arm64/processor.h > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/arm64/processor.h > @@ -357,4 +357,6 @@ static __always_inline u64 ctxt_reg_alias(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 encoding) > return KVM_ARM64_SYS_REG(alias); > } > > +void kvm_get_default_vcpu_target(struct kvm_vm *vm, struct kvm_vcpu_init *init); > + > #endif /* SELFTEST_KVM_PROCESSOR_H */ > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/arm64/processor.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/arm64/processor.c > index 311660a9f655..5ae65fefd48c 100644 > --- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/arm64/processor.c > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/arm64/processor.c > @@ -267,19 +267,24 @@ void virt_arch_dump(FILE *stream, struct kvm_vm *vm, uint8_t indent) > } > } > > +void kvm_get_default_vcpu_target(struct kvm_vm *vm, struct kvm_vcpu_init *init) > +{ > + struct kvm_vcpu_init preferred = {}; > + > + vm_ioctl(vm, KVM_ARM_PREFERRED_TARGET, &preferred); > + > + *init = preferred; > +} > + > void aarch64_vcpu_setup(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_vcpu_init *init) > { > struct kvm_vcpu_init default_init = { .target = -1, }; > struct kvm_vm *vm = vcpu->vm; > uint64_t sctlr_el1, tcr_el1, ttbr0_el1; > > - if (!init) > + if (!init) { > + kvm_get_default_vcpu_target(vm, &default_init); > init = &default_init; > - > - if (init->target == -1) { > - struct kvm_vcpu_init preferred; > - vm_ioctl(vm, KVM_ARM_PREFERRED_TARGET, &preferred); > - init->target = preferred.target; > } > > vcpu_ioctl(vcpu, KVM_ARM_VCPU_INIT, init); > -- > 2.47.3 >