linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
To: shechenglong <shechenglong@xfusion.com>
Cc: "will@kernel.org" <will@kernel.org>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	xulei <stone.xulei@xfusion.com>,
	chenjialong <chenjialong@xfusion.com>,
	yuxiating <yuxiating@xfusion.com>
Subject: Re: 答复: [PATCH] cpu: fix hard lockup triggered during stress-ng stress testing.
Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2025 17:54:00 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <aNF_KK9sY-a_weH5@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2eeb109f50b34e628327972d1af57f5d@xfusion.com>

On Fri, Sep 19, 2025 at 12:05:38PM +0000, shechenglong wrote:
> Okay, understood. Thank you! May I ask when the fix/patch is expected
> to be available?

If you send one, that could be really soon ;). See Mark's suggestions
for where to add the pr_info().

-- 
Catalin


  reply	other threads:[~2025-09-22 16:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-09-18  6:49 [PATCH] cpu: fix hard lockup triggered during stress-ng stress testing shechenglong
2025-09-18 11:28 ` Catalin Marinas
2025-09-19 12:05   ` 答复: " shechenglong
2025-09-22 16:54     ` Catalin Marinas [this message]
2025-09-22 16:08   ` Mark Rutland
2025-09-24 12:32 ` [PATCH] cpu: fix hard lockup triggered by printk calls within scheduling context shechenglong
2025-09-25 13:48   ` Catalin Marinas
2025-10-03 14:23   ` Will Deacon
2025-10-20 14:51 ` [PATCH v2 0/2] arm64: spectre: Fix hard lockup and cleanup mitigation messages shechenglong
2025-10-20 14:51   ` [PATCH v2 1/2] cpu:Remove the print when the CONFIG_MITIGATE_SPECTRE_BRANCH_HISTORY Kconfig option is disabled shechenglong
2025-10-20 14:51   ` [PATCH v2 2/2] cpu: fix hard lockup triggered by printk calls within scheduling context shechenglong
2025-10-29  3:45 ` [RESEND v2 0/2] arm64: spectre: Fix hard lockup and cleanup mitigation messages shechenglong
2025-10-29  3:45   ` [PATCH v2 1/2] cpu:Remove the print when the CONFIG_MITIGATE_SPECTRE_BRANCH_HISTORY Kconfig option is disabled shechenglong
2025-10-30 14:48     ` Will Deacon
2025-10-29  3:45   ` [PATCH v2 2/2] cpu: fix hard lockup triggered by printk calls within scheduling context shechenglong
2025-10-30 14:50     ` Will Deacon
2025-10-31  9:15 ` [PATCH v3 0/2] arm64: spectre: Fix hard lockup and cleanup mitigation messages shechenglong
2025-10-31  9:15   ` [PATCH v3 1/2] cpu:Remove the print when the CONFIG_MITIGATE_SPECTRE_BRANCH_HISTORY Kconfig option is disabled shechenglong
2025-10-31  9:15   ` [PATCH v3 2/2] cpu: fix hard lockup triggered by printk calls within scheduling context shechenglong
2025-11-07 15:53   ` [PATCH v3 0/2] arm64: spectre: Fix hard lockup and cleanup mitigation messages Will Deacon

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=aNF_KK9sY-a_weH5@arm.com \
    --to=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=chenjialong@xfusion.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=shechenglong@xfusion.com \
    --cc=stone.xulei@xfusion.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    --cc=yuxiating@xfusion.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).