From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 73063CAC5A7 for ; Tue, 23 Sep 2025 08:30:04 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender:List-Subscribe:List-Help :List-Post:List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:Content-Type: MIME-Version:References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=CKqFdA8GHYXfFUOGldnkZyW68C95ycj/6y4+MPEn6QE=; b=XVt+mchn/HolQ0n+Cggw2gw7HG 9kVn4d3Ut1Phg+gGHOjqUEkKNrkOi23+xkg1vceM+xRbEOXw1W2V5JzLDBwbZEhciZyg4MyDKzgn1 TbFeajboyuZZqEwB32z49XVmK+qVKgGXnDGezStEFba6qZKxNI9AJ7AMtn0C0MCs1hJ+6Z5ucBP9d yBHXcpfgHigfoQDZNwJnYZWFvaSHu4aRC/VVyBMm00xOBtwGTj6bx6xGrRqqXMuh/6oYHo/x0dtCa 6EhFk9e3gQNYx09vkEAe5eEtrBn20OlNoacfkLEFvSAY7DxPgVDC6NsCaC2HNLa5v7mXcXbipdtvA uX5rzjeg==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.98.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1v0yPP-0000000Cog1-0EbU; Tue, 23 Sep 2025 08:29:59 +0000 Received: from sea.source.kernel.org ([2600:3c0a:e001:78e:0:1991:8:25]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.98.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1v0yPN-0000000Coeo-1ECK for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Tue, 23 Sep 2025 08:29:58 +0000 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (transwarp.subspace.kernel.org [100.75.92.58]) by sea.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E92D0438D0; Tue, 23 Sep 2025 08:29:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 954B6C4CEF5; Tue, 23 Sep 2025 08:29:55 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1758616196; bh=CKqFdA8GHYXfFUOGldnkZyW68C95ycj/6y4+MPEn6QE=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=D6kdpA/8R69LG8IHWPX0RCknKW1LmJSlhB9gYPcB6Nm8mLNv8djI5Vf23hKcWY9UY Q8rucrPzn/VXJb7lVBeGkarBlb/LdFqly7R1BXRnMYAhBCErj60ohHgZIbsFHq0Icw PrBsSkQjboPTHoFPklVBneY/Px+oNwbpo2Z0TSfGVCTex0SowlHfoekWbm2oCIi9mR Ur22S8z5ylr8l+YfHMnauz8bt4VnjQ4MoyhcRoZmLXdftDiLsoWsb4zh0nXnGKXGpJ bLJrWdMn5sHwMvkouzEM9ZJCgyZJdzFUS3rd0CwGAQJD2a7mqFMVW5PmkyxAJPju+q otGiBTH96Pcvw== Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2025 09:29:52 +0100 From: Will Deacon To: Ilkka Koskinen Cc: Dan Carpenter , oe-kbuild@lists.linux.dev, lkp@intel.com, oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: [arm64:for-next/perf 5/28] drivers/perf/dwc_pcie_pmu.c:418 dwc_pcie_pmu_validate_group() error: uninitialized symbol 'time_event'. Message-ID: References: <202509231223.gZsX6Eio-lkp@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20250923_012957_347676_A5CB4305 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 11.49 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Tue, Sep 23, 2025 at 12:55:01AM -0700, Ilkka Koskinen wrote: > That's cleary a bug and I don't know how I missed it. Don't worry, these things happen. As Dan pointed out, it's hard to catch this in practice anyway (and the robot is doing its job for us). > I can submit a new version or a separate patch to fix it in the morning. > Which one do you prefer? Please just send fixes on top of for-next/perf, as that is a non-rebasing branch. Will