From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5D88DCAC5A5 for ; Tue, 23 Sep 2025 08:35:32 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender:List-Subscribe:List-Help :List-Post:List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:Content-Type: MIME-Version:References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=7E3C0GYNlj0hYhjD9/c2lHqaFNoZ8ozSgnfG4yKpPwA=; b=RBVmVrp6AoSPPM9XrLbEBnB9UI 0qMNOjQLCBEeyXjOz5BVqzgRN1GQa4UoTLyHGLXaOlcqExx4Nl11Ru/EcDOhPUt1CgwYCzp2wReS6 1cryHen9hYfppTPkGBo4tXArZwauCOOphc9haTaRpN2x80UoFUhAKXZvhQ2bvDv+SG2bKSI6Bxiyp f086q36n4LIOuidTcO4XbVF2kdpmfPkWOvQMUxF10gq6GFB/+UEutqzw+1XApNs895CEh1AV3vh6C X8SYtTMf4IrQs/zu0Lg35yG4NUu8V5SMPvPHHRwuhjGRDkrlx2NSGhmKmDxttAtWHrgCGpIqvd4fP 0pUg94LA==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.98.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1v0yUf-0000000CpJN-2i8b; Tue, 23 Sep 2025 08:35:25 +0000 Received: from tor.source.kernel.org ([2600:3c04:e001:324:0:1991:8:25]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.98.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1v0yUd-0000000CpJH-3hgi for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Tue, 23 Sep 2025 08:35:24 +0000 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (transwarp.subspace.kernel.org [100.75.92.58]) by tor.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17A8260203; Tue, 23 Sep 2025 08:35:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 82A21C4CEF5; Tue, 23 Sep 2025 08:35:21 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1758616522; bh=+rRxUkZspQylYOU643PlOSIkzkgXe3gEa5Qgh0Ams44=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=nHGYI3EwrOgfDnYsZPAngBO4cZRbkx31coOrmnbE/GCrRy1EpezDwwo4hz2F8r+4M mfxCehwPJKRDFVZmUoB58RWgDNM/6D1Z7odutzxs3uBHCy1nT5uWrEQDIZ+NDdaLMa ZbrfcPYysvXSdnMJpJewzOd+LAZXc8PPv2GUDJ/6qMuW7R/BF0eCYaonj66B4x6vj4 BrSrrKvN7X3K7PH6fcohh+wdBHLyuRO7vyl+MkG29isHid4fX/skSscxm9hplK+HgB WZD/J2infr5N74WE5hXtEWrFY/AimcxV3M1kgmk9er7iwhXnTio5xVLsEtsxTScvwz w2ikAQHpZVQdQ== Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2025 09:35:18 +0100 From: Will Deacon To: Dan Carpenter Cc: Ilkka Koskinen , oe-kbuild@lists.linux.dev, lkp@intel.com, oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: [arm64:for-next/perf 5/28] drivers/perf/dwc_pcie_pmu.c:418 dwc_pcie_pmu_validate_group() error: uninitialized symbol 'time_event'. Message-ID: References: <202509231223.gZsX6Eio-lkp@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Tue, Sep 23, 2025 at 11:27:21AM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote: > On Tue, Sep 23, 2025 at 12:55:01AM -0700, Ilkka Koskinen wrote: > > That's cleary a bug and I don't know how I missed it. > > Because we disabled uninitialized variable warnings for GCC and because > everyone has CONFIG_INIT_STACK_ALL_ZERO set so it wouldn't show up in > testing either. The more annoying thing is that I run smatch on my tree before pushing but somehow I didn't notice this. I'll run it again to see whether it detected it in the first place... Will