Linux-ARM-Kernel Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Frank Li <Frank.li@nxp.com>
To: Marco Felsch <m.felsch@pengutronix.de>,
	robh@kernel.org, laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com
Cc: Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org>, Shawn Guo <shawnguo@kernel.org>,
	Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>,
	Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@pengutronix.de>,
	Fabio Estevam <festevam@gmail.com>,
	Jiada Wang <jiada_wang@mentor.com>,
	dmaengine@vger.kernel.org, imx@lists.linux.dev,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] dmaengine: add device_link support
Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2025 12:31:56 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <aNVufDmHjLRauKYo@lizhi-Precision-Tower-5810> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250912-v6-16-topic-dma-devlink-v1-1-4debc2fbf901@pengutronix.de>

On Fri, Sep 12, 2025 at 12:00:41AM +0200, Marco Felsch wrote:
> Shift the device dependency handling to the driver core by adding
> support for devlinks.
>
> The link between the consumer device and the dmaengine device is
> established by the consumer via the dma_request_chan() automatically if
> the dmaengine driver supports it (create_devlink flag set).
>
> By adding the devlink support it is ensured that the supplier can't be
> removed while the consumer still uses the dmaengine. Furthermore it
> ensures that the supplier driver is present and actual bound before the
> consumer is uses the supplier.
>
> Additional PM and runtime-PM dependency handling can be added easily too
> by setting the required flags (not implemented by this commit).
>
> The new create_devlink flag controlls the devlink creation to not cause
> any regressions with existing dmaengine drivers. This flag can be
> removed once all drivers are successfully tested to support devlinks.
>
> Signed-off-by: Marco Felsch <m.felsch@pengutronix.de>
> ---

Add previous discussion link:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/aLhUv+mtr1uZTCth@lizhi-Precision-Tower-5810/

Another thread
https://lore.kernel.org/dmaengine/20250801120007.GB4906@pendragon.ideasonboard.com/

Add Laurent Pinchart, who may instest this topic also.

Add Rob Herring, who may know why dma engine can't create dev_link default
like other provider (clk, phy, gpio ...)


>  drivers/dma/dmaengine.c   | 15 +++++++++++++++
>  include/linux/dmaengine.h |  3 +++
>  2 files changed, 18 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/dma/dmaengine.c b/drivers/dma/dmaengine.c
> index 758fcd0546d8bde8e8dddc6039848feeb1e24475..e81985ab806ae87ff3aa4739fe6f6328b2587f2e 100644
> --- a/drivers/dma/dmaengine.c
> +++ b/drivers/dma/dmaengine.c
> @@ -858,6 +858,21 @@ struct dma_chan *dma_request_chan(struct device *dev, const char *name)
>  	/* No functional issue if it fails, users are supposed to test before use */
>  #endif
>
> +	/*
> +	 * Devlinks between the dmaengine device and the consumer device
> +	 * are optional till all dmaengine drivers are converted/tested.
> +	 */
> +	if (chan->device->create_devlink) {
> +		struct device_link *dl;
> +
> +		dl = device_link_add(dev, chan->device->dev, DL_FLAG_AUTOREMOVE_CONSUMER);

I suggest link to per channel device, instead dma engine devices.
chan->dev->device like phy drivers because some dma-engine have per channel
resources, like power domain and clocks.

Frank


> +		if (!dl) {
> +			dev_err(dev, "failed to create device link to %s\n",
> +					dev_name(chan->device->dev));
> +			return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
> +		}
> +	}
> +
>  	chan->name = kasprintf(GFP_KERNEL, "dma:%s", name);
>  	if (!chan->name)
>  		return chan;
> diff --git a/include/linux/dmaengine.h b/include/linux/dmaengine.h
> index bb146c5ac3e4ccd7bc0afbf3b28e5b3d659ad62f..c67737a358df659f2bf050a9ccb8d23b17ceb357 100644
> --- a/include/linux/dmaengine.h
> +++ b/include/linux/dmaengine.h
> @@ -817,6 +817,8 @@ struct dma_filter {
>   *	DMA tansaction with no software intervention for reinitialization.
>   *	Zero value means unlimited number of entries.
>   * @descriptor_reuse: a submitted transfer can be resubmitted after completion
> + * @create_devlink: create a devlink between a dma_chan_dev supplier and
> + *	dma-channel consumer device
>   * @residue_granularity: granularity of the transfer residue reported
>   *	by tx_status
>   * @device_alloc_chan_resources: allocate resources and return the
> @@ -894,6 +896,7 @@ struct dma_device {
>  	u32 max_burst;
>  	u32 max_sg_burst;
>  	bool descriptor_reuse;
> +	bool create_devlink;
>  	enum dma_residue_granularity residue_granularity;
>
>  	int (*device_alloc_chan_resources)(struct dma_chan *chan);
>
> --
> 2.47.3
>


  reply	other threads:[~2025-09-25 16:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-09-11 22:00 [PATCH 0/2] Add DMA devlink support Marco Felsch
2025-09-11 22:00 ` [PATCH 1/2] dmaengine: add device_link support Marco Felsch
2025-09-25 16:31   ` Frank Li [this message]
2025-10-27  1:11     ` Laurent Pinchart
2025-10-27 18:59       ` Frank Li
2025-09-11 22:00 ` [PATCH 2/2] dmaengine: imx-sdma: fix supplier/consumer dependency handling Marco Felsch

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=aNVufDmHjLRauKYo@lizhi-Precision-Tower-5810 \
    --to=frank.li@nxp.com \
    --cc=dmaengine@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=festevam@gmail.com \
    --cc=imx@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=jiada_wang@mentor.com \
    --cc=kernel@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=m.felsch@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=robh@kernel.org \
    --cc=s.hauer@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=shawnguo@kernel.org \
    --cc=vkoul@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox