> > -	ret = request_firmware(&fw, NPU_EN7581_FIRMWARE_DATA, dev);
> > +	if (of_device_is_compatible(dev->of_node, "airoha,an7583-npu"))
> > +		fw_name = NPU_AN7583_FIRMWARE_DATA;
> > +	else
> > +		fw_name = NPU_EN7581_FIRMWARE_DATA;
> > +	ret = request_firmware(&fw, fw_name, dev);
> >  	if (ret)
> >  		return ret == -ENOENT ? -EPROBE_DEFER : ret;
> >  
> > @@ -612,6 +623,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(airoha_npu_put);
> >  
> >  static const struct of_device_id of_airoha_npu_match[] = {
> >  	{ .compatible = "airoha,en7581-npu" },
> > +	{ .compatible = "airoha,an7583-npu" },
> 
> It would be more normal to make use of the void * in of_device_id to
> have per compatible data, such are firmware name.
> 
> 	Andrew

ack, I implemted this way since we have 2 fw names but we can have a struct
pointed by of_device_id driver_data pointer to contains both of them.
What do you think?

Regards,
Lorenzo