Re: [PATCH v13 09/12] KVM: selftests: Use proper uAPI headers to pick up mempolicy.h definitions

[Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>]

On Fri, Oct 17, 2025, Shivank Garg wrote:
> 
> 
> On 10/16/2025 10:58 PM, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> > Drop the KVM's re-definitions of MPOL_xxx flags in numaif.h as they are
> > defined by the already-included, kernel-provided mempolicy.h.  The only
> > reason the duplicate definitions don't cause compiler warnings is because
> > they are identical, but only on x86-64!  The syscall numbers in particular
> > are subtly x86_64-specific, i.e. will cause problems if/when numaif.h is
> > used outsize of x86.
> > 
> > Opportunistically clean up the file comment as the license information is
> > covered by the SPDX header, the path is superfluous, and as above the
> > comment about the contents is flat out wrong.
> > 
> > Fixes: 346b59f220a2 ("KVM: selftests: Add missing header file needed by xAPIC IPI tests")
> > Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
> > ---
> >  tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/numaif.h | 32 +-------------------
> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 31 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/numaif.h b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/numaif.h
> > index aaa4ac174890..1554003c40a1 100644
> > --- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/numaif.h
> > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/numaif.h
> > @@ -1,14 +1,5 @@
> >  /* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only */
> > -/*
> > - * tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/numaif.h
> > - *
> > - * Copyright (C) 2020, Google LLC.
> > - *
> > - * This work is licensed under the terms of the GNU GPL, version 2.
> > - *
> > - * Header file that provides access to NUMA API functions not explicitly
> > - * exported to user space.
> > - */
> > +/* Copyright (C) 2020, Google LLC. */
> 
> Given this file got a complete overhaul in this series, Should the copyright be 2020, 2025?
> Not entirely sure what the rules are for this.

Me either.  I just figure I can't really go totally wrong by doing nothing :-)