From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
To: Jack Thomson <jackabt.amazon@gmail.com>
Cc: maz@kernel.org, oliver.upton@linux.dev, pbonzini@redhat.com,
joey.gouly@arm.com, suzuki.poulose@arm.com,
yuzenghui@huawei.com, catalin.marinas@arm.com, will@kernel.org,
shuah@kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
kvmarm@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, isaku.yamahata@intel.com,
roypat@amazon.co.uk, kalyazin@amazon.co.uk, jackabt@amazon.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/4] KVM: selftests: Fix unaligned mmap allocations
Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2025 10:16:05 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aPpi1c-8EpWuo87B@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251013151502.6679-3-jackabt.amazon@gmail.com>
On Mon, Oct 13, 2025, Jack Thomson wrote:
> From: Jack Thomson <jackabt@amazon.com>
>
> When creating a VM using mmap with huge pages, and the memory amount does
> not align with the underlying page size. The stored mmap_size value does
> not account for the fact that mmap will automatically align the length
> to a multiple of the underlying page size. During the teardown of the
> test, munmap is used. However, munmap requires the length to be a
> multiple of the underlying page size.
What happens when selftests use the wrong map_size? E.g. is munmap() silently
failing? If so, then I should probably take this particular patch through
kvm-x86/gmem, otherwise it means we'll start getting asserts due to:
3223560c93eb ("KVM: selftests: Define wrappers for common syscalls to assert success")
If munmap() isn't failing, then that begs the question of what this patch is
actually doing :-)
> Update the vm_mem_add method to ensure the mmap_size is aligned to the
> underlying page size.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jack Thomson <jackabt@amazon.com>
> ---
> tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/kvm_util.c | 12 +++++-------
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/kvm_util.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/kvm_util.c
> index c3f5142b0a54..b106fbed999c 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/kvm_util.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/kvm_util.c
> @@ -1051,7 +1051,6 @@ void vm_mem_add(struct kvm_vm *vm, enum vm_mem_backing_src_type src_type,
> /* Allocate and initialize new mem region structure. */
> region = calloc(1, sizeof(*region));
> TEST_ASSERT(region != NULL, "Insufficient Memory");
> - region->mmap_size = mem_size;
>
> #ifdef __s390x__
> /* On s390x, the host address must be aligned to 1M (due to PGSTEs) */
> @@ -1060,6 +1059,11 @@ void vm_mem_add(struct kvm_vm *vm, enum vm_mem_backing_src_type src_type,
> alignment = 1;
> #endif
>
> + alignment = max(backing_src_pagesz, alignment);
> + region->mmap_size = align_up(mem_size, alignment);
> +
> + TEST_ASSERT_EQ(guest_paddr, align_up(guest_paddr, backing_src_pagesz));
> +
> /*
> * When using THP mmap is not guaranteed to returned a hugepage aligned
> * address so we have to pad the mmap. Padding is not needed for HugeTLB
> @@ -1067,12 +1071,6 @@ void vm_mem_add(struct kvm_vm *vm, enum vm_mem_backing_src_type src_type,
> * page size.
> */
> if (src_type == VM_MEM_SRC_ANONYMOUS_THP)
> - alignment = max(backing_src_pagesz, alignment);
> -
> - TEST_ASSERT_EQ(guest_paddr, align_up(guest_paddr, backing_src_pagesz));
> -
> - /* Add enough memory to align up if necessary */
> - if (alignment > 1)
> region->mmap_size += alignment;
>
> region->fd = -1;
> --
> 2.43.0
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-10-23 17:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-10-13 15:14 [PATCH v2 0/4] KVM ARM64 pre_fault_memory Jack Thomson
2025-10-13 15:14 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] KVM: arm64: Add pre_fault_memory implementation Jack Thomson
2025-10-16 14:01 ` Suzuki K Poulose
2025-10-13 15:14 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] KVM: selftests: Fix unaligned mmap allocations Jack Thomson
2025-10-23 17:16 ` Sean Christopherson [this message]
2025-10-28 11:44 ` Thomson, Jack
2025-11-03 21:08 ` Sean Christopherson
2025-11-04 11:40 ` Thomson, Jack
2025-11-04 20:19 ` Sean Christopherson
2025-11-13 11:34 ` Thomson, Jack
2025-10-13 15:15 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] KVM: selftests: Enable pre_fault_memory_test for arm64 Jack Thomson
2025-10-13 15:15 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] KVM: selftests: Add option for different backing in pre-fault tests Jack Thomson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aPpi1c-8EpWuo87B@google.com \
--to=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=isaku.yamahata@intel.com \
--cc=jackabt.amazon@gmail.com \
--cc=jackabt@amazon.com \
--cc=joey.gouly@arm.com \
--cc=kalyazin@amazon.co.uk \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=oliver.upton@linux.dev \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=roypat@amazon.co.uk \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=yuzenghui@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).