From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 65957CCFA13 for ; Sat, 8 Nov 2025 21:19:56 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender:List-Subscribe:List-Help :List-Post:List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:Content-Type: MIME-Version:References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=4VDEmqKvR+2+vB5u84GfGQoTfC3cnTXVPN+Vsjz3UEY=; b=WIFhgWEx4FCCjWbRMD5aMR6iOj 5Usq/64z1Vwzg0eVwgfV3jAYh8GOOnGC+aXOzQ9vjAGax2cTrfKb5v1ogf7NW7uNayBdtQHdyj4Tm f1D99/KQmcT2K3hfaJFgvc3fAG03f7k5BWJ802O+EyviauLM65/9vABUCtg7n7llBsN2GGGUmLQUm CC6bR2wEvrpEHy2CG28SXmnUoTtFUGrK/CN6URxuo/bkcb8dNwouFTeAypOeyMq23FRWpDrPbi+dS ngAHzw27nyCqf8c0Fw+XPQgyIaZR2mgtqPkab4gCwcUZu6QYEriw6AaTcxVLKUdHdhXEB1D3S88zY ah+fqaxw==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.98.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1vHqLd-00000003TVt-3q4U; Sat, 08 Nov 2025 21:19:49 +0000 Received: from sea.source.kernel.org ([172.234.252.31]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.98.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1vHqLZ-00000003TUA-1SoR for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Sat, 08 Nov 2025 21:19:46 +0000 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (transwarp.subspace.kernel.org [100.75.92.58]) by sea.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 151EB40A2F; Sat, 8 Nov 2025 21:19:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6B4FAC19425; Sat, 8 Nov 2025 21:19:44 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1762636784; bh=xwtOyHhUhjUtQS7W2RceLVNraeqZaBqVnVbwNj4o/gY=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=ZDwjdXqW0uk/R0DFhRACQsFtHW0y3oSYLsNQHzoGf1orkq4mnD/KyY0VJomMupty5 YWUee0OgHX52VlLjsvdEYraS3mIWBfF65tsAGW4RTGlal90d2kRrKXFasl+X2LTRZH V6renckqVcGJjpzjOiLfleGCCs9NSTmjF4Ll+7RL36P8W7GLCQCU08KGy/17jjiMgn 0R/4HkNk6n1sfQJ7BOmyoS/dAs/qX/7cBCB+584k/YPXc9QcZcI7uqMHIzbpuSNrlZ kDzC6B/sQdvvqFTQna066tewF1w7xvmGJIQn38Gl8y4tk82KFDvW1W0wQ0y+y2GeyN XTTbY446yDa4g== Date: Sat, 8 Nov 2025 22:15:20 +0100 From: Nicolas Schier To: Simon Glass Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Chen-Yu Tsai , Ahmad Fatoum , Masahiro Yamada , J =?iso-8859-1?Q?=2E_Neusch=E4fer?= , Tom Rini , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/7] scripts/make_fit: Support an initial ramdisk Message-ID: References: <20251006230205.521341-1-sjg@chromium.org> <20251006230205.521341-3-sjg@chromium.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20251006230205.521341-3-sjg@chromium.org> X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20251108_131945_405896_F0C8E108 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 14.36 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Mon, Oct 06, 2025 at 05:01:53PM -0600, Simon Glass wrote: > FIT (Flat Image Tree) allows a ramdisk to be included in each > configuration. Add support for this to the script. > > This feature is not available via 'make image.fit' since the ramdisk > likely needs to be built separately anyway, e.g. using modules from > the kernel build. A later patch in this series provides support for > doing that. > > Note that the uncompressed size is not correct when a ramdisk is use, I think something is missing: "is in use" or "is used"? > since it is too expensive to decompress the ramdisk. > > Signed-off-by: Simon Glass > --- > Reviewed-by: Nicolas Schier -- Nicolas