From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3A660CCF9E0 for ; Tue, 28 Oct 2025 17:47:54 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender:List-Subscribe:List-Help :List-Post:List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:Content-Type: MIME-Version:References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=9A0uibkeTCaIFcoZgfbAN1n3LDDq5OYVnx6j2mA+dr0=; b=SO3JA+8I7TGBwGoS/dbkg2ZJbj JOq9T8dr08Hl77UKk2p+idy7SSEQV5n8TTiPoH7wYLQLKu9nF0ikUu3ZfoYQ/eLSs3Lu6tLJKAhyt jmfTk6NoFlAZF9/d7MO4jFYZctFNKagsZNSyN05cjqWNdmy7gmLnojAxcpbn+oFaSkjPIOIKMwDMN aN7vH3gjy64OmLrt23TlBBvRbwv2I2D5Ku45s+kiq1F/5QKNpcOYQ3XDgfuTgbfqQie9L/8ghVnNk kdq2sLD2kS/g2KtXCFkE9/MwDrkO8YYzgsVl2YkEjdm/VvOa2mfwbh6glbY5UGCx1XrRIDWxjwqrK 0a+gJVMg==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.98.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1vDnnO-0000000GQe5-194o; Tue, 28 Oct 2025 17:47:46 +0000 Received: from tor.source.kernel.org ([2600:3c04:e001:324:0:1991:8:25]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.98.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1vDnnM-0000000GQdl-3nIi for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Tue, 28 Oct 2025 17:47:44 +0000 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (transwarp.subspace.kernel.org [100.75.92.58]) by tor.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 031216013E; Tue, 28 Oct 2025 17:47:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7711CC4CEE7; Tue, 28 Oct 2025 17:47:43 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1761673663; bh=Cf95w80aUdBCexcAXXklVfncQajwu0vJl7eWpjuz120=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=b2nS80rP0T20ccHauAlWnqkCpTXh+lxp06dydw70FiFbZOkURPrwzQPiFlKQXJpDQ 9GlU5pgZodK7khU5a3Y7SHRv0+ydEpMhp7Xxroge7zYmIfIUN6SWtToe+ijInmYFdB TsyU01hZm0IcnWZFvpGra89rRDPj8P+A1zE5KQFESZTdhlTqkCaLrlo76fOum6xS9V RT30RsCm57QhhOKbkejmY9WU2K78zxjLPyXqU78qqVKlT8DbtP5r2qaOc2VcXBNcft 9te8eMunTbcHGf+NQ2KO3CcGDJiOiuDPXQoFR5oyLpA5/yGlDnpumQbIV2JFmUO2sW u7FRTRCO+3NLA== Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2025 13:47:42 -0400 From: Sasha Levin To: Brian Masney Cc: patches@lists.linux.dev, stable@vger.kernel.org, Sudeep Holla , Peng Fan , mturquette@baylibre.com, sboyd@kernel.org, arm-scmi@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-clk@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH AUTOSEL 6.17-6.12] clk: scmi: migrate round_rate() to determine_rate() Message-ID: References: <20251026144958.26750-1-sashal@kernel.org> <20251026144958.26750-39-sashal@kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Sun, Oct 26, 2025 at 07:16:13PM -0400, Brian Masney wrote: >Hi Sasha, > >On Sun, Oct 26, 2025 at 10:49:17AM -0400, Sasha Levin wrote: >> From: Brian Masney >> >> [ Upstream commit 80cb2b6edd8368f7e1e8bf2f66aabf57aa7de4b7 ] >> >> This driver implements both the determine_rate() and round_rate() clk >> ops, and the round_rate() clk ops is deprecated. When both are defined, >> clk_core_determine_round_nolock() from the clk core will only use the >> determine_rate() clk ops. >> >> The existing scmi_clk_determine_rate() is a noop implementation that >> lets the firmware round the rate as appropriate. Drop the existing >> determine_rate implementation and convert the existing round_rate() >> implementation over to determine_rate(). >> >> scmi_clk_determine_rate() was added recently when the clock parent >> support was added, so it's not expected that this change will regress >> anything. >> >> Reviewed-by: Sudeep Holla >> Reviewed-by: Peng Fan >> Tested-by: Peng Fan #i.MX95-19x19-EVK >> Signed-off-by: Brian Masney >> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin > >Please drop this commit from all stable backports. Ack, thanks for the review! -- Thanks, Sasha