From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
To: Ankur Arora <ankur.a.arora@oracle.com>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Linux-Arch <linux-arch@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
bpf@vger.kernel.org, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Haris Okanovic <harisokn@amazon.com>,
"Christoph Lameter (Ampere)" <cl@gentwo.org>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>,
Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>,
zhenglifeng1@huawei.com, xueshuai@linux.alibaba.com,
Joao Martins <joao.m.martins@oracle.com>,
Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com>,
Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH v7 2/7] arm64: barrier: Support smp_cond_load_relaxed_timeout()
Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2025 13:55:35 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aQoF1-uKTgJo89W8@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87ikfqesr2.fsf@oracle.com>
On Mon, Nov 03, 2025 at 01:00:33PM -0800, Ankur Arora wrote:
> /**
> * smp_cond_load_relaxed_timeout() - (Spin) wait for cond with no ordering
> * guarantees until a timeout expires.
> * @ptr: pointer to the variable to wait on
> * @cond: boolean expression to wait for
> * @time_expr: time expression in caller's preferred clock
> * @time_end: end time in nanosecond (compared against time_expr;
> * might also be used for setting up a future event.)
> *
> * Equivalent to using READ_ONCE() on the condition variable.
> *
> * Note that the expiration of the timeout might have an architecture specific
> * delay.
> */
> #ifndef smp_cond_load_relaxed_timeout
> #define smp_cond_load_relaxed_timeout(ptr, cond_expr, time_expr, time_end_ns) \
> ({ \
> typeof(ptr) __PTR = (ptr); \
> __unqual_scalar_typeof(*ptr) VAL; \
> u32 __n = 0, __spin = SMP_TIMEOUT_POLL_COUNT; \
> u64 __time_end_ns = (time_end_ns); \
> \
> for (;;) { \
> VAL = READ_ONCE(*__PTR); \
> if (cond_expr) \
> break; \
> cpu_poll_relax(__PTR, VAL, __time_end_ns); \
With time_end_ns being passed to cpu_poll_relax(), we assume that this
is always the absolute time. Do we still need time_expr in this case?
It works for WFET as long as we can map this time_end_ns onto the
hardware CNTVCT.
Alternatively, we could pass something like remaining_ns, though not
sure how smp_cond_load_relaxed_timeout() can decide to spin before
checking time_expr again (we probably went over this in the past two
years ;)).
> if (++__n < __spin) \
> continue; \
> if ((time_expr) >= __time_end_ns) { \
> VAL = READ_ONCE(*__PTR); \
> break; \
> } \
> __n = 0; \
> } \
> (typeof(*ptr))VAL; \
> })
> #endif
--
Catalin
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-11-04 13:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-10-28 5:31 [RESEND PATCH v7 0/7] barrier: Add smp_cond_load_*_timeout() Ankur Arora
2025-10-28 5:31 ` [RESEND PATCH v7 1/7] asm-generic: barrier: Add smp_cond_load_relaxed_timeout() Ankur Arora
2025-10-28 9:42 ` Arnd Bergmann
2025-10-29 3:17 ` Ankur Arora
2025-11-02 21:52 ` Arnd Bergmann
2025-11-03 21:41 ` Ankur Arora
2025-10-28 5:31 ` [RESEND PATCH v7 2/7] arm64: barrier: Support smp_cond_load_relaxed_timeout() Ankur Arora
2025-10-28 8:42 ` Arnd Bergmann
2025-10-28 16:21 ` Christoph Lameter (Ampere)
2025-10-28 18:01 ` Ankur Arora
2025-10-28 21:17 ` Catalin Marinas
2025-11-02 21:39 ` Arnd Bergmann
2025-11-03 21:00 ` Ankur Arora
2025-11-04 13:55 ` Catalin Marinas [this message]
2025-11-05 8:27 ` Ankur Arora
2025-11-05 10:37 ` Arnd Bergmann
2025-11-06 0:36 ` Ankur Arora
2025-10-28 5:31 ` [RESEND PATCH v7 3/7] arm64: rqspinlock: Remove private copy of smp_cond_load_acquire_timewait() Ankur Arora
2025-10-28 5:31 ` [RESEND PATCH v7 4/7] asm-generic: barrier: Add smp_cond_load_acquire_timeout() Ankur Arora
2025-10-28 5:31 ` [RESEND PATCH v7 5/7] atomic: Add atomic_cond_read_*_timeout() Ankur Arora
2025-10-28 5:31 ` [RESEND PATCH v7 6/7] rqspinlock: Use smp_cond_load_acquire_timeout() Ankur Arora
2025-10-28 5:31 ` [RESEND PATCH v7 7/7] cpuidle/poll_state: Poll via smp_cond_load_relaxed_timeout() Ankur Arora
2025-10-28 12:30 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2025-10-29 4:41 ` Ankur Arora
2025-10-29 18:53 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2025-10-29 19:13 ` Ankur Arora
2025-10-29 20:29 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2025-10-29 21:01 ` Ankur Arora
2025-11-04 18:07 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2025-11-05 8:30 ` Ankur Arora
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aQoF1-uKTgJo89W8@arm.com \
--to=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=ankur.a.arora@oracle.com \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=cl@gentwo.org \
--cc=daniel.lezcano@linaro.org \
--cc=harisokn@amazon.com \
--cc=joao.m.martins@oracle.com \
--cc=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=memxor@gmail.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=xueshuai@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=zhenglifeng1@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).