linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
To: Ankur Arora <ankur.a.arora@oracle.com>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Linux-Arch <linux-arch@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
	bpf@vger.kernel.org, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	Haris Okanovic <harisokn@amazon.com>,
	"Christoph Lameter (Ampere)" <cl@gentwo.org>,
	Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
	"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
	Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>,
	Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>,
	zhenglifeng1@huawei.com, xueshuai@linux.alibaba.com,
	Joao Martins <joao.m.martins@oracle.com>,
	Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com>,
	Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH v7 2/7] arm64: barrier: Support smp_cond_load_relaxed_timeout()
Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2025 13:55:35 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <aQoF1-uKTgJo89W8@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87ikfqesr2.fsf@oracle.com>

On Mon, Nov 03, 2025 at 01:00:33PM -0800, Ankur Arora wrote:
>     /**
>     * smp_cond_load_relaxed_timeout() - (Spin) wait for cond with no ordering
>     * guarantees until a timeout expires.
>     * @ptr: pointer to the variable to wait on
>     * @cond: boolean expression to wait for
>     * @time_expr: time expression in caller's preferred clock
>     * @time_end: end time in nanosecond (compared against time_expr;
>     * might also be used for setting up a future event.)
>     *
>     * Equivalent to using READ_ONCE() on the condition variable.
>     *
>     * Note that the expiration of the timeout might have an architecture specific
>     * delay.
>     */
>     #ifndef smp_cond_load_relaxed_timeout
>     #define smp_cond_load_relaxed_timeout(ptr, cond_expr, time_expr, time_end_ns)	\
>     ({									\
>             typeof(ptr) __PTR = (ptr);					\
>             __unqual_scalar_typeof(*ptr) VAL;				\
>             u32 __n = 0, __spin = SMP_TIMEOUT_POLL_COUNT;		\
>             u64 __time_end_ns = (time_end_ns);				\
>                                                                         \
>             for (;;) {							\
>                     VAL = READ_ONCE(*__PTR);				\
>                     if (cond_expr)					\
>                             break;					\
>                     cpu_poll_relax(__PTR, VAL, __time_end_ns);		\

With time_end_ns being passed to cpu_poll_relax(), we assume that this
is always the absolute time. Do we still need time_expr in this case?
It works for WFET as long as we can map this time_end_ns onto the
hardware CNTVCT.

Alternatively, we could pass something like remaining_ns, though not
sure how smp_cond_load_relaxed_timeout() can decide to spin before
checking time_expr again (we probably went over this in the past two
years ;)).

>                     if (++__n < __spin)				\
>                             continue;					\
>                     if ((time_expr) >= __time_end_ns) {		\
>                             VAL = READ_ONCE(*__PTR);			\
>                             break;					\
>                     }							\
>                     __n = 0;						\
>             }								\
>             (typeof(*ptr))VAL;						\
>     })
>     #endif

-- 
Catalin


  reply	other threads:[~2025-11-04 13:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-10-28  5:31 [RESEND PATCH v7 0/7] barrier: Add smp_cond_load_*_timeout() Ankur Arora
2025-10-28  5:31 ` [RESEND PATCH v7 1/7] asm-generic: barrier: Add smp_cond_load_relaxed_timeout() Ankur Arora
2025-10-28  9:42   ` Arnd Bergmann
2025-10-29  3:17     ` Ankur Arora
2025-11-02 21:52       ` Arnd Bergmann
2025-11-03 21:41         ` Ankur Arora
2025-10-28  5:31 ` [RESEND PATCH v7 2/7] arm64: barrier: Support smp_cond_load_relaxed_timeout() Ankur Arora
2025-10-28  8:42   ` Arnd Bergmann
2025-10-28 16:21     ` Christoph Lameter (Ampere)
2025-10-28 18:01     ` Ankur Arora
2025-10-28 21:17       ` Catalin Marinas
2025-11-02 21:39         ` Arnd Bergmann
2025-11-03 21:00           ` Ankur Arora
2025-11-04 13:55             ` Catalin Marinas [this message]
2025-11-05  8:27               ` Ankur Arora
2025-11-05 10:37                 ` Arnd Bergmann
2025-11-06  0:36                   ` Ankur Arora
2025-10-28  5:31 ` [RESEND PATCH v7 3/7] arm64: rqspinlock: Remove private copy of smp_cond_load_acquire_timewait() Ankur Arora
2025-10-28  5:31 ` [RESEND PATCH v7 4/7] asm-generic: barrier: Add smp_cond_load_acquire_timeout() Ankur Arora
2025-10-28  5:31 ` [RESEND PATCH v7 5/7] atomic: Add atomic_cond_read_*_timeout() Ankur Arora
2025-10-28  5:31 ` [RESEND PATCH v7 6/7] rqspinlock: Use smp_cond_load_acquire_timeout() Ankur Arora
2025-10-28  5:31 ` [RESEND PATCH v7 7/7] cpuidle/poll_state: Poll via smp_cond_load_relaxed_timeout() Ankur Arora
2025-10-28 12:30   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2025-10-29  4:41     ` Ankur Arora
2025-10-29 18:53       ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2025-10-29 19:13         ` Ankur Arora
2025-10-29 20:29           ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2025-10-29 21:01             ` Ankur Arora
2025-11-04 18:07               ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2025-11-05  8:30                 ` Ankur Arora

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=aQoF1-uKTgJo89W8@arm.com \
    --to=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=ankur.a.arora@oracle.com \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=cl@gentwo.org \
    --cc=daniel.lezcano@linaro.org \
    --cc=harisokn@amazon.com \
    --cc=joao.m.martins@oracle.com \
    --cc=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
    --cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=memxor@gmail.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rafael@kernel.org \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    --cc=xueshuai@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=zhenglifeng1@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).