From: Mostafa Saleh <smostafa@google.com>
To: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>
Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvmarm@lists.linux.dev,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, iommu@lists.linux.dev,
maz@kernel.org, oliver.upton@linux.dev, joey.gouly@arm.com,
suzuki.poulose@arm.com, yuzenghui@huawei.com,
catalin.marinas@arm.com, robin.murphy@arm.com,
jean-philippe@linaro.org, qperret@google.com, tabba@google.com,
mark.rutland@arm.com, praan@google.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 15/28] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Load the driver later in KVM mode
Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2025 16:40:26 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aQt9-kTCe8TpuyVq@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251002151308.GG3195829@ziepe.ca>
On Thu, Oct 02, 2025 at 12:13:08PM -0300, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 29, 2025 at 11:10:11AM +0000, Mostafa Saleh wrote:
> > Another possible solution, to keep a device bound to the KVM driver,
> > is to probe the SMMUs from the KVM driver, then to create child devices;
> > possibly use something as device_set_of_node_from_dev to bind those to
> > the main SMMUv3 or find another way to probe the main SMMUv3 without
> > changes.
>
> I do prefer something more like this one, I think it is nice that the
> kvm specific driver will remain bound and visible so there is some
> breadcrumbs about what happened to the system for debugging/etc.
>
> Not sure how to do it, but I think it should be achievable..
>
> Maybe even a simple faux/aux device and just pick up the of_node from
> the parent..
I spent some time looking into this
With the approach of creating new devices as:
pdev = platform_device_alloc(dev_name(dev), PLATFORM_DEVID_AUTO);
pdev->dev.parent = dev;
device_set_node(&pdev->dev, dev->fwnode);
platform_device_add_resources(pdev, cur_pdev->resource,
cur_pdev->num_resources);
platform_device_add(pdev);
That is done from an init call after KVM init, where the KVM driver
probes the SMMUs, which then does
bus_rescan_devices(&platform_bus_type);
In the KVM driver probe, it had:
if (pdev->dev.parent->driver == &smmuv3_nesting_driver.driver)
return -ENODEV;
Which causes the main SMMU driver to probe the new devices.
However, that didn’t work because, as from Linux perspective the
nested driver was bound to all the SMMUs which means that any
device that is connected to an SMMUv3 has its dependencies met, which
caused those drivers to start probing without IOMMU ops.
Also, the approach with bind/unbind seemed to not work reliably
because of the same reason.
Looking into the probe path, it roughly does.
1) Device / Driver matching driver_match_device
2) Check suppliers before probe (device_links_check_suppliers)
3) Actual probe
I can’t see a way of adding dependencies in #1
For #2, there 2 problems,
i) It’s not clear how to create links, something as fwnode_link_add()
won’t work as one of the devices won’t have fwnode and device_link_add()
will need the device to be already created (and not sure how
to guarantee it won’t probe)
ii) Assuming we were able to create the link, it will be set to
DL_STATE_AVAILABLE once the nested driver probes, which won’t prevent
the main driver from probing till KVM initialises.
It seems device links are not the write tool to use.
So far, the requirements we need to satisfy are:
1- No driver should bind to the SMMUs before KVM initialises.
2- Back the nested driver with devices and possibly link them
The only possible solutions I see:
1- Keep patch as is
2- Check if KVM is initialised from the SMMUv3 driver,
if not -EPROBE_DEFER (as Will suggested), that will guarded by the
KVM driver macro and cmdline to enable protected mode.
Then if needed, we can create devices from the nested driver and link
them to the main ones in same initcall after the devices are created.
I can to look into more suggestions, otherwise, I will try with #2
with the -EPROBE_DEFER.
Thanks,
Mostafa
>
> Jason
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-11-05 16:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 82+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-08-19 21:51 [PATCH v4 00/28] KVM: arm64: SMMUv3 driver for pKVM (trap and emulate) Mostafa Saleh
2025-08-19 21:51 ` [PATCH v4 01/28] KVM: arm64: Add a new function to donate memory with prot Mostafa Saleh
2025-09-09 13:46 ` Will Deacon
2025-09-14 19:23 ` Pranjal Shrivastava
2025-09-16 11:58 ` Mostafa Saleh
2025-09-16 11:56 ` Mostafa Saleh
2025-08-19 21:51 ` [PATCH v4 02/28] KVM: arm64: Donate MMIO to the hypervisor Mostafa Saleh
2025-09-09 14:12 ` Will Deacon
2025-09-16 13:27 ` Mostafa Saleh
2025-09-26 14:33 ` Will Deacon
2025-09-29 10:57 ` Mostafa Saleh
2025-09-14 20:41 ` Pranjal Shrivastava
2025-09-16 13:43 ` Mostafa Saleh
2025-08-19 21:51 ` [PATCH v4 03/28] KVM: arm64: pkvm: Add pkvm_time_get() Mostafa Saleh
2025-09-09 14:16 ` Will Deacon
2025-09-09 15:56 ` Marc Zyngier
2025-09-15 11:10 ` Pranjal Shrivastava
2025-09-16 14:04 ` Mostafa Saleh
2025-08-19 21:51 ` [PATCH v4 04/28] iommu/io-pgtable-arm: Move selftests to a separate file Mostafa Saleh
2025-09-15 14:37 ` Pranjal Shrivastava
2025-09-16 14:07 ` Mostafa Saleh
2025-09-15 16:45 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-09-16 14:09 ` Mostafa Saleh
2025-08-19 21:51 ` [PATCH v4 05/28] iommu/io-pgtable-arm: Factor kernel specific code out Mostafa Saleh
2025-08-19 21:51 ` [PATCH v4 06/28] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Split code with hyp Mostafa Saleh
2025-09-09 14:23 ` Will Deacon
2025-09-16 14:10 ` Mostafa Saleh
2025-08-19 21:51 ` [PATCH v4 07/28] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Move TLB range invalidation into a macro Mostafa Saleh
2025-09-09 14:25 ` Will Deacon
2025-08-19 21:51 ` [PATCH v4 08/28] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Move IDR parsing to common functions Mostafa Saleh
2025-08-19 21:51 ` [PATCH v4 09/28] KVM: arm64: iommu: Introduce IOMMU driver infrastructure Mostafa Saleh
2025-08-19 21:51 ` [PATCH v4 10/28] KVM: arm64: iommu: Shadow host stage-2 page table Mostafa Saleh
2025-09-09 14:42 ` Will Deacon
2025-09-16 14:24 ` Mostafa Saleh
2025-09-26 14:42 ` Will Deacon
2025-09-29 11:01 ` Mostafa Saleh
2025-09-30 12:38 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-09-30 12:55 ` Mostafa Saleh
2025-08-19 21:51 ` [PATCH v4 11/28] KVM: arm64: iommu: Add memory pool Mostafa Saleh
2025-08-19 21:51 ` [PATCH v4 12/28] KVM: arm64: iommu: Support DABT for IOMMU Mostafa Saleh
2025-08-19 21:51 ` [PATCH v4 13/28] iommu/arm-smmu-v3-kvm: Add SMMUv3 driver Mostafa Saleh
2025-08-19 21:51 ` [PATCH v4 14/28] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Add KVM mode in the driver Mostafa Saleh
2025-09-12 13:52 ` Will Deacon
2025-09-16 14:30 ` Mostafa Saleh
2025-08-19 21:51 ` [PATCH v4 15/28] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Load the driver later in KVM mode Mostafa Saleh
2025-09-12 13:54 ` Will Deacon
2025-09-23 14:35 ` Mostafa Saleh
2025-09-23 17:38 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-09-29 11:10 ` Mostafa Saleh
2025-10-02 15:13 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-11-05 16:40 ` Mostafa Saleh [this message]
2025-11-05 17:12 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-11-06 11:06 ` Mostafa Saleh
2025-11-06 13:23 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-11-06 16:54 ` Mostafa Saleh
2025-11-06 17:16 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-08-19 21:51 ` [PATCH v4 16/28] iommu/arm-smmu-v3-kvm: Create array for hyp SMMUv3 Mostafa Saleh
2025-09-09 18:30 ` Daniel Mentz
2025-09-16 14:35 ` Mostafa Saleh
2025-08-19 21:51 ` [PATCH v4 17/28] iommu/arm-smmu-v3-kvm: Take over SMMUs Mostafa Saleh
2025-08-19 21:51 ` [PATCH v4 18/28] iommu/arm-smmu-v3-kvm: Probe SMMU HW Mostafa Saleh
2025-08-19 21:51 ` [PATCH v4 19/28] iommu/arm-smmu-v3-kvm: Add MMIO emulation Mostafa Saleh
2025-08-19 21:51 ` [PATCH v4 20/28] iommu/arm-smmu-v3-kvm: Shadow the command queue Mostafa Saleh
2025-08-19 21:51 ` [PATCH v4 21/28] iommu/arm-smmu-v3-kvm: Add CMDQ functions Mostafa Saleh
2025-08-19 21:51 ` [PATCH v4 22/28] iommu/arm-smmu-v3-kvm: Emulate CMDQ for host Mostafa Saleh
2025-09-12 14:18 ` Will Deacon
2025-09-15 16:38 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-09-16 15:19 ` Mostafa Saleh
2025-09-17 12:36 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-09-17 15:01 ` Will Deacon
2025-09-17 15:16 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-09-17 15:25 ` Will Deacon
2025-09-17 15:59 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-09-18 10:26 ` Will Deacon
2025-09-18 14:36 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-09-16 14:50 ` Mostafa Saleh
2025-08-19 21:51 ` [PATCH v4 23/28] iommu/arm-smmu-v3-kvm: Shadow stream table Mostafa Saleh
2025-08-19 21:51 ` [PATCH v4 24/28] iommu/arm-smmu-v3-kvm: Shadow STEs Mostafa Saleh
2025-08-19 21:51 ` [PATCH v4 25/28] iommu/arm-smmu-v3-kvm: Emulate GBPA Mostafa Saleh
2025-08-19 21:51 ` [PATCH v4 26/28] iommu/arm-smmu-v3-kvm: Support io-pgtable Mostafa Saleh
2025-08-19 21:51 ` [PATCH v4 27/28] iommu/arm-smmu-v3-kvm: Shadow the CPU stage-2 page table Mostafa Saleh
2025-08-19 21:51 ` [PATCH v4 28/28] iommu/arm-smmu-v3-kvm: Enable nesting Mostafa Saleh
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aQt9-kTCe8TpuyVq@google.com \
--to=smostafa@google.com \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=jean-philippe@linaro.org \
--cc=jgg@ziepe.ca \
--cc=joey.gouly@arm.com \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=oliver.upton@linux.dev \
--cc=praan@google.com \
--cc=qperret@google.com \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
--cc=tabba@google.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=yuzenghui@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).