From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
To: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb+git@google.com>
Cc: linux-efi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>,
Pierre Gondois <Pierre.Gondois@arm.com>,
Sami Mujawar <Sami.Mujawar@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 resend 0/7] arm64: Make EFI calls preemptible
Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2025 18:45:49 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aROEXadFWdJoQEzx@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251015205634.3820870-9-ardb+git@google.com>
On Wed, Oct 15, 2025 at 10:56:35PM +0200, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> Ard Biesheuvel (7):
> efi: Add missing static initializer for efi_mm::cpus_allowed_lock
> efi/runtime-wrappers: Keep track of the efi_runtime_lock owner
> arm64/fpsimd: Don't warn when EFI execution context is preemptible
> arm64/fpsimd: Permit kernel mode NEON with IRQs off
> arm64/efi: Drop efi_rt_lock spinlock from EFI arch wrapper
> arm64/efi: Move uaccess en/disable out of efi_set_pgd()
> arm64/efi: Call EFI runtime services without disabling preemption
The series looks fine to me:
Acked-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
What do you plan to do with this, merge via the EFI tree? Are there any
dependencies?
--
Catalin
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-11-11 18:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-10-15 20:56 [PATCH v4 resend 0/7] arm64: Make EFI calls preemptible Ard Biesheuvel
2025-10-15 20:56 ` [PATCH v4 resend 1/7] efi: Add missing static initializer for efi_mm::cpus_allowed_lock Ard Biesheuvel
2025-10-15 20:56 ` [PATCH v4 resend 2/7] efi/runtime-wrappers: Keep track of the efi_runtime_lock owner Ard Biesheuvel
2025-10-15 20:56 ` [PATCH v4 resend 3/7] arm64/fpsimd: Don't warn when EFI execution context is preemptible Ard Biesheuvel
2025-11-04 15:52 ` Will Deacon
2025-11-04 16:00 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2025-11-04 16:16 ` Will Deacon
2025-10-15 20:56 ` [PATCH v4 resend 4/7] arm64/fpsimd: Permit kernel mode NEON with IRQs off Ard Biesheuvel
2025-10-15 20:56 ` [PATCH v4 resend 5/7] arm64/efi: Drop efi_rt_lock spinlock from EFI arch wrapper Ard Biesheuvel
2025-10-15 20:56 ` [PATCH v4 resend 6/7] arm64/efi: Move uaccess en/disable out of efi_set_pgd() Ard Biesheuvel
2025-10-15 20:56 ` [PATCH v4 resend 7/7] arm64/efi: Call EFI runtime services without disabling preemption Ard Biesheuvel
2025-11-11 18:45 ` Catalin Marinas [this message]
2025-11-11 18:50 ` [PATCH v4 resend 0/7] arm64: Make EFI calls preemptible Ard Biesheuvel
2025-11-11 18:59 ` Catalin Marinas
2025-11-11 20:16 ` Catalin Marinas
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aROEXadFWdJoQEzx@arm.com \
--to=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=Pierre.Gondois@arm.com \
--cc=Sami.Mujawar@arm.com \
--cc=ardb+git@google.com \
--cc=ardb@kernel.org \
--cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-efi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).