Linux-ARM-Kernel Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
To: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
Cc: Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@nvidia.com>,
	robin.murphy@arm.com, joro@8bytes.org, kevin.tian@intel.com,
	praan@google.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	iommu@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	skolothumtho@nvidia.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] iommu/arm-smmu-v3-iommufd: Allow attaching nested domain for GBPA cases
Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2025 21:47:17 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <aSTSZacbqy3hvKIe@willie-the-truck> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251124193435.GL153257@nvidia.com>

On Mon, Nov 24, 2025 at 03:34:35PM -0400, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 03, 2025 at 09:27:55AM -0800, Nicolin Chen wrote:
> > A vDEVICE has been a hard requirement for attaching a nested domain to the
> > device. This makes sense when installing a guest STE, since a vSID must be
> > present and given to the kernel during the vDEVICE allocation.
> > 
> > But, when CR0.SMMUEN is disabled, VM doesn't really need a vSID to program
> > the vSMMU behavior as GBPA will take effect, in which case the vSTE in the
> > nested domain could have carried the bypass or abort configuration in GBPA
> > register. Thus, having such a hard requirement doesn't work well for GBPA.
> > 
> > Skip vmaster allocation in arm_smmu_attach_prepare_vmaster() for an abort
> > or bypass vSTE. Note that device on this attachment won't report vevents.
> > 
> > Update the uAPI doc accordingly.
> > 
> > Tested-by: Shameer Kolothum <skolothumtho@nvidia.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@nvidia.com>
> > ---
> > 
> > Changelog
> > v2
> >  * Add Tested-by from Shameer
> >  * Skip vmaster allocation instead of bypassing vsid=0
> >  * Revise the uAPI doc to note a corner case when CR0.SMMUEN=1
> > 
> >  drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3-iommufd.c | 13 ++++++++++++-
> >  include/uapi/linux/iommufd.h                        |  9 +++++++++
> >  2 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> Reviewed-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
> 
> Will, I will grab this in a few days unless you want it in your tree

Sure, go for it.

Will


  reply	other threads:[~2025-11-24 21:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-11-03 17:27 [PATCH v2] iommu/arm-smmu-v3-iommufd: Allow attaching nested domain for GBPA cases Nicolin Chen
2025-11-05 21:14 ` Pranjal Shrivastava
2025-11-13  4:58 ` Shuai Xue
2025-11-24 19:34 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-11-24 21:47   ` Will Deacon [this message]
2025-11-25 15:26 ` Jason Gunthorpe

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=aSTSZacbqy3hvKIe@willie-the-truck \
    --to=will@kernel.org \
    --cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=jgg@nvidia.com \
    --cc=joro@8bytes.org \
    --cc=kevin.tian@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nicolinc@nvidia.com \
    --cc=praan@google.com \
    --cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
    --cc=skolothumtho@nvidia.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox