From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 44A68D0EE3D for ; Tue, 25 Nov 2025 21:28:07 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender:List-Subscribe:List-Help :List-Post:List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:Content-Type: MIME-Version:References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=uwy8lEzu0DXK5GvcEEbZtQoKcEvxsPJIvPgI9uQM5Z4=; b=hLEEry9eF0E0/yhxL+SF5jAHa0 9QkuPrll/Da2LVfwvy6HyUG43D1CN5UabNEEYCfdqlsq+iZzpHG+2LZoqsPFcnf1qacuUOsvz4P2E fu7CVsjSr/1uSa/QXIp3vwn/TDvbwXdor5Oy+i7Okrg7wiFDiXsQSUBOscseYXeJ+C1mo2itIl9N2 wD16bRRF0zAIkNiW6wHlJ6V6LI2DkWMwP+kVauS3gbcO8e142SHj/uvVDwmy3olSidTxaPEOReCZb tXNJK0+nGXtkFpM25JESVsv7Qb0sTvJpBzkgsaXFvrXeiZQBzYuJmz1WA+kaBe/ZYoCLFZL8yJYTe oV88SoTw==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.98.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1vO0Zx-0000000DxzV-0CKl; Tue, 25 Nov 2025 21:28:05 +0000 Received: from sea.source.kernel.org ([2600:3c0a:e001:78e:0:1991:8:25]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.98.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1vO0Zu-0000000Dxz9-3YBW for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Tue, 25 Nov 2025 21:28:03 +0000 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (transwarp.subspace.kernel.org [100.75.92.58]) by sea.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2181F43EFD; Tue, 25 Nov 2025 21:28:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D7399C4CEF1; Tue, 25 Nov 2025 21:28:01 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1764106082; bh=Lthp2oIt0CjSTyCBl6DdHeK3C8f8yjc6ypdos1FTR5E=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=CgIVQwWURIbdEZ3ocsensRhZKL7wV1xvWkKKDVbNit1OCAkrfIeYyvEjdmnrc/WnJ 0ZQtSoKlCgewMZ4UKWi61o3MsHQ+eY96LzKigyGHVcQSj9BDvAhwMgJqJuZfYDPkMx fhK0jT5wwgXCvV+tYevIKTXpj0YudgyN21qUXMtAbPlNDE+jdNt2CHLfbaC+8OBotj Q9l0MqTSDTXyg9bMiJP9qmT6BTqs2wKAz03bgDfb2PPIr+JBauloeEB36jvAG1Wqhh TVzKkVFvkKsK0taA215mB//BuTcCRSzNP0I7Li/RBDqMJXsWLFU92GMvMt0FJ4febN LaBG86xAkv65g== Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2025 13:28:00 -0800 From: Oliver Upton To: Marc Zyngier Cc: Catalin Marinas , Ben Horgan , will@kernel.org, joey.gouly@arm.com, suzuki.poulose@arm.com, yuzenghui@huawei.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, kvmarm@lists.linux.dev, shuah@kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] set_id_regs cleanup Message-ID: References: <20251125101207.1492580-1-ben.horgan@arm.com> <86cy56qgi3.wl-maz@kernel.org> <87cy55galp.wl-maz@kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87cy55galp.wl-maz@kernel.org> X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20251125_132802_925777_F5027DD5 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 19.84 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Tue, Nov 25, 2025 at 07:45:22PM +0000, Marc Zyngier wrote: > On Tue, 25 Nov 2025 18:31:37 +0000, > Catalin Marinas wrote: > > > > On Tue, Nov 25, 2025 at 03:27:48PM +0000, Marc Zyngier wrote: > > > On Tue, 25 Nov 2025 10:12:05 +0000, > > > Ben Horgan wrote: > > > > > > > > For this v2 I've dropped the ksft_test accounting fix. Mark Brown has > > > > more extensive changes [1] and looks to be a user of the set_id_regs > > > > test rather than someone just doing some cleanup. The other change in > > > > this series is to remove ARM64_FEATURE_FIELD_BITS from the tools > > > > sysreg.h header rather than the kernel version. I'll send a separate > > > > patch to remove the kernel version. > > > > > > > > Tidies up a few small things in set_id_regs. The removal of > > > > ARM64_FEATURE_FIELD_BITS touches other code only so much as it removes > > > > the define but set_id_regs.c is the only place its used. > > > > > > Acked-by: Marc Zyngier > > > > Thanks Marc. Shall I take these through the arm64 tree, together with > > the removal of the macro? They should have probably been a single > > series. > > Oliver is in charge of the merge window this time around, so I'll > defer to him, but that's absolutely fine from my PoV. Catalin, please go ahead and apply. I don't believe I have anything that will conflict. Acked-by: Oliver Upton Thanks, Oliver