From: Niklas Cassel <cassel@kernel.org>
To: "Jingoo Han" <jingoohan1@gmail.com>,
"Manivannan Sadhasivam" <mani@kernel.org>,
"Lorenzo Pieralisi" <lpieralisi@kernel.org>,
"Krzysztof Wilczyński" <kwilczynski@kernel.org>,
"Rob Herring" <robh@kernel.org>,
"Bjorn Helgaas" <bhelgaas@google.com>,
"Heiko Stuebner" <heiko@sntech.de>
Cc: FUKAUMI Naoki <naoki@radxa.com>,
linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org,
linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] PCI: dwc: Make Link Up IRQ logic handle already powered on PCIe switches
Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2025 06:45:59 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aTZmF5AEJQhQld4Y@ryzen> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251201063634.4115762-2-cassel@kernel.org>
On Mon, Dec 01, 2025 at 07:36:35AM +0100, Niklas Cassel wrote:
Mani, could you perhaps try this series on Qcom?
I personally prefer this series over a revert because:
It allows to us to still use a PCIe endpoint that comes up after the
main system has booted, e.g. when the PCIe endpoint is a board running
pci-epf-test, without the need for a manual rescan on be bus.
If we go with revert instead, this very nice feature would be gone,
and the user would need to do a manual rescan of the bus.
One could even argue that that is a user visible regression.
Kind regards,
Niklas
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-12-08 5:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-12-01 6:36 [PATCH v2] PCI: dwc: Make Link Up IRQ logic handle already powered on PCIe switches Niklas Cassel
2025-12-01 6:40 ` Niklas Cassel
2025-12-08 5:45 ` Niklas Cassel [this message]
2025-12-08 6:20 ` Krishna Chaitanya Chundru
2025-12-09 5:12 ` Niklas Cassel
2025-12-09 5:27 ` Krishna Chaitanya Chundru
2025-12-09 5:36 ` Niklas Cassel
2025-12-12 3:52 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2025-12-12 6:37 ` Niklas Cassel
2025-12-22 6:15 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2025-12-09 7:11 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2025-12-09 7:45 ` Niklas Cassel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aTZmF5AEJQhQld4Y@ryzen \
--to=cassel@kernel.org \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=heiko@sntech.de \
--cc=jingoohan1@gmail.com \
--cc=kwilczynski@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=lpieralisi@kernel.org \
--cc=mani@kernel.org \
--cc=naoki@radxa.com \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).