From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 507A0CEBF88 for ; Mon, 8 Dec 2025 05:46:15 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender:List-Subscribe:List-Help :List-Post:List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:Content-Type: MIME-Version:References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=4oPFnaKOuwa795QouzAkLdFmxipO+zRI6ijexJF2Dxw=; b=zIRkr6lFbTPfgaPYFia/5xqVV/ WbHoQdcZ+xXSVjdNcDArNZXyVSa0VDt/XNFAT1Ewdkmkzj0lLelRwCq6GiNFF4OwAEhzmLhCZPLzL /cI5qMJN1P2dPaCe5affrr9G7K9bytieFJ/HvnKzX65SzoTCPa7KbnWlvREP8J0EnroG1y+cqp23O 7iATYKUZMui+PHdS0F6GIQDGX1crqv22sN0K2jKrOn+84Nj2qBEwAjNw5eiPZ4CJ3+7lTnbO50SFW tIKOZ2Zs4lqbMgsCCQ0H22kH/bZnOp/xWMEVK8eEwNAur0CXCHfSlPMVaj0d18C6okFCq83qO0l2j z2uIHqQw==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.98.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1vSU4Z-0000000Cdar-0P2m; Mon, 08 Dec 2025 05:46:11 +0000 Received: from sea.source.kernel.org ([2600:3c0a:e001:78e:0:1991:8:25]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.98.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1vSU4U-0000000CdaN-2iP9; Mon, 08 Dec 2025 05:46:10 +0000 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (transwarp.subspace.kernel.org [100.75.92.58]) by sea.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C17B641698; Mon, 8 Dec 2025 05:46:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2C384C4CEF1; Mon, 8 Dec 2025 05:46:01 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1765172764; bh=4oPFnaKOuwa795QouzAkLdFmxipO+zRI6ijexJF2Dxw=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=lCUkO5wHsKZaS1oV3YA4xJ+CuE3qQlV6O/izT24g2LwTzWQM0yWZDfrfXf8XszMZM pU7zjfUPgjvYmGK5EGD/fuhch+Ncj7uAQH/atF4qnUZpN/Zgfb5MtnJAPYXmYWlGdR ecR1dkvQK7j0zb22jeMacLyxp0uqmxqs8jS333sRUmep9+h4otHPN2oyZdOtsai0+P 6fOmtKSOJ6BRwDZxmrNJb6jFgjopig9uDBC7tMPvRkQA7r4poQaIWDEur1i4fx9W84 hsb5RlkxjqfzLp/7IylsogbO5hf7pae/x2S4Zlba4P+0aiJ+uDNLuNM3jR6xIJKzbM L3Rhlaf8d62oQ== Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2025 06:45:59 +0100 From: Niklas Cassel To: Jingoo Han , Manivannan Sadhasivam , Lorenzo Pieralisi , Krzysztof =?utf-8?Q?Wilczy=C5=84ski?= , Rob Herring , Bjorn Helgaas , Heiko Stuebner Cc: FUKAUMI Naoki , linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] PCI: dwc: Make Link Up IRQ logic handle already powered on PCIe switches Message-ID: References: <20251201063634.4115762-2-cassel@kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20251201063634.4115762-2-cassel@kernel.org> X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20251207_214606_707894_7627E373 X-CRM114-Status: UNSURE ( 8.56 ) X-CRM114-Notice: Please train this message. X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Mon, Dec 01, 2025 at 07:36:35AM +0100, Niklas Cassel wrote: Mani, could you perhaps try this series on Qcom? I personally prefer this series over a revert because: It allows to us to still use a PCIe endpoint that comes up after the main system has booted, e.g. when the PCIe endpoint is a board running pci-epf-test, without the need for a manual rescan on be bus. If we go with revert instead, this very nice feature would be gone, and the user would need to do a manual rescan of the bus. One could even argue that that is a user visible regression. Kind regards, Niklas