From: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
To: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
Cc: Mostafa Saleh <smostafa@google.com>,
iommu@lists.linux.dev, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, joro@8bytes.org,
Tomasz Nowicki <tnowicki@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] iommu/io-pgtable-arm: Add misisng concatenated PGD cases
Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2025 09:42:54 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aTjCDvtANr2WIv3L@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <498bbad4-ea64-4a24-a63f-e131d271990a@arm.com>
On Tue, Dec 09, 2025 at 01:33:36PM +0000, Robin Murphy wrote:
> On 2025-12-09 12:37 pm, Mostafa Saleh wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 09, 2025 at 11:34:34AM +0000, Robin Murphy wrote:
> > > On 2025-11-30 7:45 pm, Mostafa Saleh wrote:
> > > > arm_lpae_concat_mandatory() assumes that OAS >= IAS which is not
> > > > correct for SMMUs supporting AArch32, and have OAS = 32/36 bits,
> > > > as IAS would be 40 bits.
> > >
> > > But that is only when *using* AArch32 format. The bit in chapter 3.4 of the
> > > SMMU architecture is talking about the maximum IAS that an SMMU
> > > implementation needs to be able to accommodate based on its configuration,
> > > but it does then attempt to clarify that the actual IPA size in use by any
> > > given context should depend on the VMSA format in use:
> > >
> > > "VMSAv8-32 LPAE always supports an IPA size of 40 bits, whereas VMSAv8-64
> > > and VMSAv9-128 limits the maximum IPA size to the maximum PA size."
> > >
> > > Rule R_SRKBC in the Arm ARM lays out the exact T0SZ constraints with this
> > > AArch32/AArch64 detail.
> >
> > I see, thanks a lot for the explanation, I got confused by the this
> > statement:
> > Note: If AArch32 is implemented, IAS == MAX(40, OAS), otherwise IAS == OAS.
>
> Indeed, that appears confusingly contradictory; I've filed a bug.
I think the spec has always been worded like this. My reading is that, in
isolation:
- VMSAv8-32 LPAE always uses a 40-bit IAS
- VMSAv8-64 has IAS == OAS and this can be smaller than 40 bits
so if AArch32 is implemented, we know that the hardware supports at
least a 40-bit IAS and in that case the VMSAv8-64 IAS can be bigger
than the OAS.
That seems consistent to me; where is the contradiction?
Will (jet-lagged so may well be talking rubbish!)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-12-10 0:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-11-30 19:45 [PATCH] iommu/io-pgtable-arm: Add misisng concatenated PGD cases Mostafa Saleh
2025-12-09 11:34 ` Robin Murphy
2025-12-09 12:37 ` Mostafa Saleh
2025-12-09 13:33 ` Robin Murphy
2025-12-09 15:41 ` Mostafa Saleh
2025-12-10 0:42 ` Will Deacon [this message]
2025-12-10 12:06 ` Robin Murphy
2025-12-11 2:09 ` Will Deacon
2025-12-11 11:04 ` Robin Murphy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aTjCDvtANr2WIv3L@google.com \
--to=will@kernel.org \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=smostafa@google.com \
--cc=tnowicki@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).