linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
To: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
Cc: Mostafa Saleh <smostafa@google.com>,
	iommu@lists.linux.dev, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, joro@8bytes.org,
	Tomasz Nowicki <tnowicki@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] iommu/io-pgtable-arm: Add misisng concatenated PGD cases
Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2025 09:42:54 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <aTjCDvtANr2WIv3L@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <498bbad4-ea64-4a24-a63f-e131d271990a@arm.com>

On Tue, Dec 09, 2025 at 01:33:36PM +0000, Robin Murphy wrote:
> On 2025-12-09 12:37 pm, Mostafa Saleh wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 09, 2025 at 11:34:34AM +0000, Robin Murphy wrote:
> > > On 2025-11-30 7:45 pm, Mostafa Saleh wrote:
> > > > arm_lpae_concat_mandatory() assumes that OAS >= IAS which is not
> > > > correct for SMMUs supporting AArch32, and have OAS = 32/36 bits,
> > > > as IAS would be 40 bits.
> > > 
> > > But that is only when *using* AArch32 format. The bit in chapter 3.4 of the
> > > SMMU architecture is talking about the maximum IAS that an SMMU
> > > implementation needs to be able to accommodate based on its configuration,
> > > but it does then attempt to clarify that the actual IPA size in use by any
> > > given context should depend on the VMSA format in use:
> > > 
> > > "VMSAv8-32 LPAE always supports an IPA size of 40 bits, whereas VMSAv8-64
> > > and VMSAv9-128 limits the maximum IPA size to the maximum PA size."
> > > 
> > > Rule R_SRKBC in the Arm ARM lays out the exact T0SZ constraints with this
> > > AArch32/AArch64 detail.
> > 
> > I see, thanks a lot for the explanation, I got confused by the this
> > statement:
> > Note: If AArch32 is implemented, IAS == MAX(40, OAS), otherwise IAS == OAS.
> 
> Indeed, that appears confusingly contradictory; I've filed a bug.

I think the spec has always been worded like this. My reading is that, in
isolation:

  - VMSAv8-32 LPAE always uses a 40-bit IAS
  - VMSAv8-64 has IAS == OAS and this can be smaller than 40 bits

so if AArch32 is implemented, we know that the hardware supports at
least a 40-bit IAS and in that case the VMSAv8-64 IAS can be bigger
than the OAS.

That seems consistent to me; where is the contradiction?

Will (jet-lagged so may well be talking rubbish!)


  parent reply	other threads:[~2025-12-10  0:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-11-30 19:45 [PATCH] iommu/io-pgtable-arm: Add misisng concatenated PGD cases Mostafa Saleh
2025-12-09 11:34 ` Robin Murphy
2025-12-09 12:37   ` Mostafa Saleh
2025-12-09 13:33     ` Robin Murphy
2025-12-09 15:41       ` Mostafa Saleh
2025-12-10  0:42       ` Will Deacon [this message]
2025-12-10 12:06         ` Robin Murphy
2025-12-11  2:09           ` Will Deacon
2025-12-11 11:04             ` Robin Murphy

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=aTjCDvtANr2WIv3L@google.com \
    --to=will@kernel.org \
    --cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=joro@8bytes.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
    --cc=smostafa@google.com \
    --cc=tnowicki@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).