Re: [PATCH 0/3] ARM: fix hash_name() and branch predictor issues

["Russell King (Oracle)" <linux@armlinux.org.uk>]

On Wed, Dec 10, 2025 at 05:08:36PM +0800, Xie Yuanbin wrote:
> Hi, Russell!
> 
> The syzkaller test has been running for 19+ hours now, and no issues
> have been found so far. So to patch3:
> 
> Tested-by: Xie Yuanbin <xieyuanbin1@huawei.com>
> 
> This test will continue to run. If any issues are found, I will email
> you. If I don't send any emails, then there are no issues. :)

Thanks. I've updated the three patches, and pushed out the updated
tree. See the top four commits:

https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rmk/linux.git/log/?h=fixes

Given the timings, I doubt that linux-next will pick this up before
I need to send Linus a pull request before going on vacation for the
remainder of this year:

https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rmk/linux.git/log/?h=for-linus

However, I also can't guarantee that I'll be able to look at mainline
at the start of next year due to other pressures - and I don't yet
know for how long that's likely to be at the moment.

So, it's either a pull request for the for-linus tag later today,
at some point next year likely not before mid-January and splitting
it up into fixes (for -rc) and the two PREEMPT_RT non-fix patches (for
the next merge window.)

-- 
RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTP is here! 80Mbps down 10Mbps up. Decent connectivity at last!