From: Niklas Cassel <cassel@kernel.org>
To: Manivannan Sadhasivam <mani@kernel.org>
Cc: "Krishna Chaitanya Chundru" <krishna.chundru@oss.qualcomm.com>,
"Jingoo Han" <jingoohan1@gmail.com>,
"Lorenzo Pieralisi" <lpieralisi@kernel.org>,
"Krzysztof Wilczyński" <kwilczynski@kernel.org>,
"Rob Herring" <robh@kernel.org>,
"Bjorn Helgaas" <bhelgaas@google.com>,
"Heiko Stuebner" <heiko@sntech.de>,
"FUKAUMI Naoki" <naoki@radxa.com>,
linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org,
linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] PCI: dwc: Make Link Up IRQ logic handle already powered on PCIe switches
Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2025 15:37:26 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aTu4JgDcfb_58qBK@fedora> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <pjn2gs43rqbe3odh6zvh4qaftxxl6qvdzpm6pgpadxeeid42ko@4a2qradscaqd>
Hello Mani,
On Fri, Dec 12, 2025 at 12:52:35PM +0900, Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote:
> > This patch missed the v6.19 merge window (and so did the pwrctrl rework
> > series), so as long as Mani queues up both for v6.20 (with the pwrctrl
> > rework series getting applied first), I think we are good.
> >
>
> The plan is to merge pwrctrl series to v6.20 (unless we get strong objections),
> but once that happens, Qcom doesn't need this patch.
>
> So it'd be good if you can just limit this patch to just Rockchip. Then once the
> Rockchip also moves to pwrctrl, we can revert this patch (also the whole IRQ
> based link up since the Root Port is not hotplug capable).
The main reason why I did not like a revert, was because it would remove
the nice feature where the bus is enumerated automatically on link up.
I assumed that the plan was to add Link Up IRQ support in pwrctrl in the
future.
If that is not the case, and the plan is instead to eventually remove the
existing Link Up IRQ support, then perhaps you could simply apply patches
from:
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pci/20251111105100.869997-8-cassel@kernel.org/
Either the whole series or just patch 1 and 2, maintainer's choice :)
Kind regards,
Niklas
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-12-12 6:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-12-01 6:36 [PATCH v2] PCI: dwc: Make Link Up IRQ logic handle already powered on PCIe switches Niklas Cassel
2025-12-01 6:40 ` Niklas Cassel
2025-12-08 5:45 ` Niklas Cassel
2025-12-08 6:20 ` Krishna Chaitanya Chundru
2025-12-09 5:12 ` Niklas Cassel
2025-12-09 5:27 ` Krishna Chaitanya Chundru
2025-12-09 5:36 ` Niklas Cassel
2025-12-12 3:52 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2025-12-12 6:37 ` Niklas Cassel [this message]
2025-12-22 6:15 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2025-12-09 7:11 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2025-12-09 7:45 ` Niklas Cassel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aTu4JgDcfb_58qBK@fedora \
--to=cassel@kernel.org \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=heiko@sntech.de \
--cc=jingoohan1@gmail.com \
--cc=krishna.chundru@oss.qualcomm.com \
--cc=kwilczynski@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=lpieralisi@kernel.org \
--cc=mani@kernel.org \
--cc=naoki@radxa.com \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).