[PATCH] arm64: defconfig: remove SLIM_QCOM_CTRL

[PATCH] arm64: defconfig: remove SLIM_QCOM_CTRL

[Mikko Rapeli]

It has been removed by:

Fixes: 7cbba32a2d62 ("slimbus: qcom: remove unused qcom controller driver")

Signed-off-by: Mikko Rapeli <mikko.rapeli@linaro.org>
---
 arch/arm64/configs/defconfig | 1 -
 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/configs/defconfig b/arch/arm64/configs/defconfig
index 997fa7cd9de5..4dc0caa36263 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/configs/defconfig
+++ b/arch/arm64/configs/defconfig
@@ -1709,7 +1709,6 @@ CONFIG_OPTEE=y
 CONFIG_MUX_GPIO=m
 CONFIG_MUX_MMIO=y
 CONFIG_SLIMBUS=m
-CONFIG_SLIM_QCOM_CTRL=m
 CONFIG_SLIM_QCOM_NGD_CTRL=m
 CONFIG_INTERCONNECT=y
 CONFIG_INTERCONNECT_IMX=y
-- 
2.34.1

Re: [PATCH] arm64: defconfig: remove SLIM_QCOM_CTRL

[Krzysztof Kozlowski]

On 23/12/2025 14:48, Mikko Rapeli wrote:
> It has been removed by:

by commit foo bar (see also checkpatch and submitting patches).

> 
> Fixes: 7cbba32a2d62 ("slimbus: qcom: remove unused qcom controller driver")
> 

Drop blank line

Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@oss.qualcomm.com>

You anyway need to send to proper mailing list for this soc (Qcom), not
random folks.

Best regards,
Krzysztof

Re: [PATCH] arm64: defconfig: remove SLIM_QCOM_CTRL

[Mikko Rapeli]

Hi,

On Tue, Dec 23, 2025 at 02:51:45PM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 23/12/2025 14:48, Mikko Rapeli wrote:
> > It has been removed by:
> 
> by commit foo bar (see also checkpatch and submitting patches).

Ok will duplicate the info then.

> > 
> > Fixes: 7cbba32a2d62 ("slimbus: qcom: remove unused qcom controller driver")
> > 
> 
> Drop blank line

Ok
 
> Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@oss.qualcomm.com>
> 
> You anyway need to send to proper mailing list for this soc (Qcom), not
> random folks.

Which proper list?

I sent to addresses reported by get_maintainers.pl.

Cheers,

-Mikko

Re: [PATCH] arm64: defconfig: remove SLIM_QCOM_CTRL

[Krzysztof Kozlowski]

On 23/12/2025 14:58, Mikko Rapeli wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On Tue, Dec 23, 2025 at 02:51:45PM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On 23/12/2025 14:48, Mikko Rapeli wrote:
>>> It has been removed by:
>>
>> by commit foo bar (see also checkpatch and submitting patches).
> 
> Ok will duplicate the info then.
> 
>>>
>>> Fixes: 7cbba32a2d62 ("slimbus: qcom: remove unused qcom controller driver")
>>>
>>
>> Drop blank line
> 
> Ok
>  
>> Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@oss.qualcomm.com>
>>
>> You anyway need to send to proper mailing list for this soc (Qcom), not
>> random folks.
> 
> Which proper list?

The list for this soc. get_maintainers will tell you that - run it on
any soc driver for that soc.

> 
> I sent to addresses reported by get_maintainers.pl.

There is no output of get_maintainers.pl for this file. It's one of
cases where script does not work (I think already documented in
maintainer soc profile).


> 
> Cheers,
> 
> -Mikko


Best regards,
Krzysztof

Re: [PATCH] arm64: defconfig: remove SLIM_QCOM_CTRL

[Mikko Rapeli]

Hi,

On Tue, Dec 23, 2025 at 03:10:56PM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 23/12/2025 14:58, Mikko Rapeli wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 23, 2025 at 02:51:45PM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> >> On 23/12/2025 14:48, Mikko Rapeli wrote:
> >>> It has been removed by:
> >>
> >> by commit foo bar (see also checkpatch and submitting patches).
> > 
> > Ok will duplicate the info then.
> > 
> >>>
> >>> Fixes: 7cbba32a2d62 ("slimbus: qcom: remove unused qcom controller driver")
> >>>
> >>
> >> Drop blank line
> > 
> > Ok
> >  
> >> Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@oss.qualcomm.com>
> >>
> >> You anyway need to send to proper mailing list for this soc (Qcom), not
> >> random folks.
> > 
> > Which proper list?
> 
> The list for this soc. get_maintainers will tell you that - run it on
> any soc driver for that soc.
> 
> > 
> > I sent to addresses reported by get_maintainers.pl.
> 
> There is no output of get_maintainers.pl for this file. It's one of
> cases where script does not work (I think already documented in
> maintainer soc profile).

Sorry, I don't get it. This issue is a generic one since now arm64 defconfig
has one unknown option. Tools which check kernel config for unknown options
trigger warnings when arm64 defconfig is used.

If get_maintainers.pl is broken for this file, then please fix it. I don't
know how to fix it.

Cheers,

-Mikko

Re: [PATCH] arm64: defconfig: remove SLIM_QCOM_CTRL

[Krzysztof Kozlowski]

On 23/12/2025 15:36, Mikko Rapeli wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> I sent to addresses reported by get_maintainers.pl.
>>
>> There is no output of get_maintainers.pl for this file. It's one of
>> cases where script does not work (I think already documented in
>> maintainer soc profile).
> 
> Sorry, I don't get it. This issue is a generic one since now arm64 defconfig
> has one unknown option. Tools which check kernel config for unknown options
> trigger warnings when arm64 defconfig is used.
> 
> If get_maintainers.pl is broken for this file, then please fix it. I don't
> know how to fix it.

No one knows, partially because it is very, very difficult task, that's
the problem.

Best regards,
Krzysztof

Re: [PATCH] arm64: defconfig: remove SLIM_QCOM_CTRL

[Krzysztof Kozlowski]

On 23/12/2025 16:27, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 23/12/2025 15:36, Mikko Rapeli wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> I sent to addresses reported by get_maintainers.pl.
>>>
>>> There is no output of get_maintainers.pl for this file. It's one of
>>> cases where script does not work (I think already documented in
>>> maintainer soc profile).
>>
>> Sorry, I don't get it. This issue is a generic one since now arm64 defconfig
>> has one unknown option. Tools which check kernel config for unknown options
>> trigger warnings when arm64 defconfig is used.
>>
>> If get_maintainers.pl is broken for this file, then please fix it. I don't
>> know how to fix it.
> 
> No one knows, partially because it is very, very difficult task, that's
> the problem.

Ah, wait, it was fixed already! You just run get_maintainers incorrectly
- You cannot use git fallback here, it's pointless. You could have read
the get_maintainers.pl output.

Best regards,
Krzysztof

get_maintainer.pl and arch/arm64/configs/defconfig (was Re: [PATCH] arm64: defconfig: remove SLIM_QCOM_CTRL )

[Mikko Rapeli]

Hi,

On Tue, Dec 23, 2025 at 04:30:04PM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 23/12/2025 16:27, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> > On 23/12/2025 15:36, Mikko Rapeli wrote:
> >>>
> >>>>
> >>>> I sent to addresses reported by get_maintainers.pl.
> >>>
> >>> There is no output of get_maintainers.pl for this file. It's one of
> >>> cases where script does not work (I think already documented in
> >>> maintainer soc profile).
> >>
> >> Sorry, I don't get it. This issue is a generic one since now arm64 defconfig
> >> has one unknown option. Tools which check kernel config for unknown options
> >> trigger warnings when arm64 defconfig is used.
> >>
> >> If get_maintainers.pl is broken for this file, then please fix it. I don't
> >> know how to fix it.
> > 
> > No one knows, partially because it is very, very difficult task, that's
> > the problem.
> 
> Ah, wait, it was fixed already! You just run get_maintainers incorrectly
> - You cannot use git fallback here, it's pointless. You could have read
> the get_maintainers.pl output.

Could you mention what is the correct way to run get_maintainer.pl then?

I don't contribute patches to kernel on a regular basis so of course
I can make a lot of mistakes but I tried to do the right thing:

$ ./scripts/get_maintainer.pl arch/arm64/configs/defconfig 
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org> (commit_signer:27/70=39%,authored:4/70=6%,added_lines:13/116=11%,removed_lines:7/43=16%)
Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@oss.qualcomm.com> (commit_signer:14/70=20%)
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be> (commit_signer:13/70=19%)
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> (commit_signer:10/70=14%)
Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com> (commit_signer:8/70=11%)
Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org> (authored:5/70=7%,removed_lines:5/43=12%)
"André Draszik" <andre.draszik@linaro.org> (authored:4/70=6%)
"Nícolas F. R. A. Prado" <nfraprado@collabora.com> (added_lines:9/116=8%)
Andrea della Porta <andrea.porta@suse.com> (added_lines:6/116=5%)
Nicolas Frattaroli <nicolas.frattaroli@collabora.com> (added_lines:6/116=5%)
Fabrice Gasnier <fabrice.gasnier@foss.st.com> (added_lines:6/116=5%)
Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@bp.renesas.com> (removed_lines:23/43=53%)
Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com> (removed_lines:3/43=7%)
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org (open list)

and collect the emails from this output and fed them to git send-email.

Cheers,

-Mikko

Re: get_maintainer.pl and arch/arm64/configs/defconfig (was Re: [PATCH] arm64: defconfig: remove SLIM_QCOM_CTRL )

[Krzysztof Kozlowski]

On 29/12/2025 08:34, Mikko Rapeli wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On Tue, Dec 23, 2025 at 04:30:04PM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On 23/12/2025 16:27, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>> On 23/12/2025 15:36, Mikko Rapeli wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I sent to addresses reported by get_maintainers.pl.
>>>>>
>>>>> There is no output of get_maintainers.pl for this file. It's one of
>>>>> cases where script does not work (I think already documented in
>>>>> maintainer soc profile).

I wrote it here - script does not work.

>>>>
>>>> Sorry, I don't get it. This issue is a generic one since now arm64 defconfig
>>>> has one unknown option. Tools which check kernel config for unknown options
>>>> trigger warnings when arm64 defconfig is used.
>>>>
>>>> If get_maintainers.pl is broken for this file, then please fix it. I don't
>>>> know how to fix it.
>>>
>>> No one knows, partially because it is very, very difficult task, that's
>>> the problem.
>>
>> Ah, wait, it was fixed already! You just run get_maintainers incorrectly
>> - You cannot use git fallback here, it's pointless. You could have read
>> the get_maintainers.pl output.
> 
> Could you mention what is the correct way to run get_maintainer.pl then?
> 
> I don't contribute patches to kernel on a regular basis so of course
> I can make a lot of mistakes but I tried to do the right thing:
> 
> $ ./scripts/get_maintainer.pl arch/arm64/configs/defconfig 

Just like I mentioned already - you cannot use git fallback, thus you
miss --no-git-fallback.

> Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org> (commit_signer:27/70=39%,authored:4/70=6%,added_lines:13/116=11%,removed_lines:7/43=16%)
> Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@oss.qualcomm.com> (commit_signer:14/70=20%)
> Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be> (commit_signer:13/70=19%)
> Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> (commit_signer:10/70=14%)
> Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com> (commit_signer:8/70=11%)
> Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org> (authored:5/70=7%,removed_lines:5/43=12%)
> "André Draszik" <andre.draszik@linaro.org> (authored:4/70=6%)
> "Nícolas F. R. A. Prado" <nfraprado@collabora.com> (added_lines:9/116=8%)
> Andrea della Porta <andrea.porta@suse.com> (added_lines:6/116=5%)
> Nicolas Frattaroli <nicolas.frattaroli@collabora.com> (added_lines:6/116=5%)
> Fabrice Gasnier <fabrice.gasnier@foss.st.com> (added_lines:6/116=5%)
> Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@bp.renesas.com> (removed_lines:23/43=53%)
> Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com> (removed_lines:3/43=7%)

And by reading this output you would notice - no single maintainer.

> linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org (open list)
> 
> and collect the emails from this output and fed them to git send-email.
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> -Mikko


Best regards,
Krzysztof