linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Yeoreum Yun <yeoreum.yun@arm.com>
To: Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@arm.com>
Cc: catalin.marinas@arm.com, will@kernel.org,
	akpm@linux-foundation.org, david@kernel.org,
	kevin.brodsky@arm.com, quic_zhenhuah@quicinc.com,
	dev.jain@arm.com, yang@os.amperecomputing.com,
	chaitanyas.prakash@arm.com, bigeasy@linutronix.de,
	clrkwllms@kernel.org, rostedt@goodmis.org,
	lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com, ardb@kernel.org, jackmanb@google.com,
	vbabka@suse.cz, mhocko@suse.com,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-rt-devel@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] arm64: mmu: avoid allocating pages while splitting the linear mapping
Date: Fri, 2 Jan 2026 12:21:30 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <aVe4SmuU1arLs14O@e129823.arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cd1c9dd0-dc1a-497c-b78f-d6c6dde898d9@arm.com>

Hi Ryan,

Thanks for your review :)

> > linear_map_split_to_ptes() currently allocates page tables while
> > splitting the linear mapping into PTEs under stop_machine() using GFP_ATOMIC.
> >
> > This is fine for non-PREEMPT_RT configurations.
> > However, it becomes problematic on PREEMPT_RT, because
> > generic memory allocation/free APIs (e.g. pgtable_alloc(), __get_free_pages(), etc.)
> > cannot be called from a non-preemptible context, except for the _nolock() variants.
> > This is because generic memory allocation/free paths are sleepable,
> > as they rely on spin_lock(), which becomes sleepable on PREEMPT_RT.
> >
> > In other words, even calling pgtable_alloc() with GFP_ATOMIC is not permitted
> > in __linear_map_split_to_pte() when it is executed by the stopper thread,
> >  where preemption is disabled on PREEMPT_RT.
> >
> > To address this, the required number of page tables is first collected
> > and preallocated, and the preallocated page tables are then used
> > when splitting the linear mapping in __linear_map_split_to_pte().
> >
> > Fixes: 3df6979d222b ("arm64: mm: split linear mapping if BBML2 unsupported on secondary CPUs")
> > Signed-off-by: Yeoreum Yun <yeoreum.yun@arm.com>
> > ---
> >  arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c | 232 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
> >  1 file changed, 184 insertions(+), 48 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c b/arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c
> > index 9ae7ce00a7ef..96a9fa505e71 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c
> > +++ b/arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c
> > @@ -527,18 +527,15 @@ static void early_create_pgd_mapping(pgd_t *pgdir, phys_addr_t phys,
> >  		panic("Failed to create page tables\n");
> >  }
> >
> > -static phys_addr_t __pgd_pgtable_alloc(struct mm_struct *mm, gfp_t gfp,
> > -				       enum pgtable_type pgtable_type)
> > -{
> > -	/* Page is zeroed by init_clear_pgtable() so don't duplicate effort. */
> > -	struct ptdesc *ptdesc = pagetable_alloc(gfp & ~__GFP_ZERO, 0);
> > -	phys_addr_t pa;
> > -
> > -	if (!ptdesc)
> > -		return INVALID_PHYS_ADDR;
> > -
> > -	pa = page_to_phys(ptdesc_page(ptdesc));
> > +static struct ptdesc **split_pgtables;
> > +static int split_pgtables_order;
> > +static unsigned long split_pgtables_count;
> > +static unsigned long split_pgtables_idx;
> >
> > +static __always_inline void __pgd_pgtable_init(struct mm_struct *mm,
> > +					       struct ptdesc *ptdesc,
> > +					       enum pgtable_type pgtable_type)
> > +{
> >  	switch (pgtable_type) {
> >  	case TABLE_PTE:
> >  		BUG_ON(!pagetable_pte_ctor(mm, ptdesc));
> > @@ -554,19 +551,28 @@ static phys_addr_t __pgd_pgtable_alloc(struct mm_struct *mm, gfp_t gfp,
> >  		break;
> >  	}
> >
>
> nit: no need for this empty line

Okay. I'll remove..

>
> > -	return pa;
> >  }
> >
> > -static phys_addr_t
> > -pgd_pgtable_alloc_init_mm_gfp(enum pgtable_type pgtable_type, gfp_t gfp)
> > +static phys_addr_t __pgd_pgtable_alloc(struct mm_struct *mm, gfp_t gfp,
>
> nit: all remaining callers pass gfp=GFP_PGTABLE_KERNEL so you could remove the
> param?

Agree. I'll remove it.

>
> > +				       enum pgtable_type pgtable_type)
> >  {
> > -	return __pgd_pgtable_alloc(&init_mm, gfp, pgtable_type);
> > +	/* Page is zeroed by init_clear_pgtable() so don't duplicate effort. */
> > +	struct ptdesc *ptdesc = pagetable_alloc(gfp & ~__GFP_ZERO, 0);
> > +
> > +	if (!ptdesc)
> > +		return INVALID_PHYS_ADDR;
> > +
> > +	__pgd_pgtable_init(mm, ptdesc, pgtable_type);
> > +
> > +	return page_to_phys(ptdesc_page(ptdesc));
> >  }
> >
> > +typedef phys_addr_t (split_pgtable_alloc_fn)(enum pgtable_type);
>
> This type is used more generally than just for splitting. Perhaps simply call it
> "pgtable_alloc_fn"?
>
> We also pass this type around in __create_pgd_mapping() and friends; perhaps we
> should have a preparatory patch to define this type and consistently use it
> everywhere instead of passing around "phys_addr_t (*pgtable_alloc)(enum
> pgtable_type)"?

Oh. I miss that __create_pgd_mapping() uses the same callback type.
I'll follow your suggestion. Thanks!

>
> > +
> >  static phys_addr_t __maybe_unused
>
> This is no longer __maybe_unused; you can drop the decorator.

Good point. Thanks!

>
> >  pgd_pgtable_alloc_init_mm(enum pgtable_type pgtable_type)
> >  {
> > -	return pgd_pgtable_alloc_init_mm_gfp(pgtable_type, GFP_PGTABLE_KERNEL);
> > +	return __pgd_pgtable_alloc(&init_mm, GFP_PGTABLE_KERNEL, pgtable_type);
> >  }
> >
> >  static phys_addr_t
> > @@ -575,6 +581,23 @@ pgd_pgtable_alloc_special_mm(enum pgtable_type pgtable_type)
> >  	return  __pgd_pgtable_alloc(NULL, GFP_PGTABLE_KERNEL, pgtable_type);
> >  }
> >
> > +static phys_addr_t
> > +pgd_pgtable_get_preallocated(enum pgtable_type pgtable_type)
> > +{
> > +	struct ptdesc *ptdesc;
> > +
> > +	if (WARN_ON(split_pgtables_idx >= split_pgtables_count))
> > +		return INVALID_PHYS_ADDR;
> > +
> > +	ptdesc = split_pgtables[split_pgtables_idx++];
> > +	if (!ptdesc)
> > +		return INVALID_PHYS_ADDR;
> > +
> > +	__pgd_pgtable_init(&init_mm, ptdesc, pgtable_type);
> > +
> > +	return page_to_phys(ptdesc_page(ptdesc));
> > +}
> > +
> >  static void split_contpte(pte_t *ptep)
> >  {
> >  	int i;
> > @@ -584,7 +607,9 @@ static void split_contpte(pte_t *ptep)
> >  		__set_pte(ptep, pte_mknoncont(__ptep_get(ptep)));
> >  }
> >
> > -static int split_pmd(pmd_t *pmdp, pmd_t pmd, gfp_t gfp, bool to_cont)
> > +static int split_pmd(pmd_t *pmdp, pmd_t pmd,
> > +		     split_pgtable_alloc_fn *pgtable_alloc_fn,
>
> nit: I believe the * has no effect when passing function pointers and the usual
> convention in Linux is to not use the *. Existing functions are also calling it
> "pgtable_alloc" so perhaps this is a bit more consistent:
>
> pgtable_alloc_fn pgtable_alloc
>
> (same nitty comment for all uses below :) )

You're right. It just my *bad* habit. I'll remove it.
>
> > +		     bool to_cont)
> >  {
> >  	pmdval_t tableprot = PMD_TYPE_TABLE | PMD_TABLE_UXN | PMD_TABLE_AF;
> >  	unsigned long pfn = pmd_pfn(pmd);
> > @@ -593,7 +618,7 @@ static int split_pmd(pmd_t *pmdp, pmd_t pmd, gfp_t gfp, bool to_cont)
> >  	pte_t *ptep;
> >  	int i;
> >
> > -	pte_phys = pgd_pgtable_alloc_init_mm_gfp(TABLE_PTE, gfp);
> > +	pte_phys = pgtable_alloc_fn(TABLE_PTE);
> >  	if (pte_phys == INVALID_PHYS_ADDR)
> >  		return -ENOMEM;
> >  	ptep = (pte_t *)phys_to_virt(pte_phys);
> > @@ -628,7 +653,9 @@ static void split_contpmd(pmd_t *pmdp)
> >  		set_pmd(pmdp, pmd_mknoncont(pmdp_get(pmdp)));
> >  }
> >
> > -static int split_pud(pud_t *pudp, pud_t pud, gfp_t gfp, bool to_cont)
> > +static int split_pud(pud_t *pudp, pud_t pud,
> > +		     split_pgtable_alloc_fn *pgtable_alloc_fn,
> > +		     bool to_cont)
> >  {
> >  	pudval_t tableprot = PUD_TYPE_TABLE | PUD_TABLE_UXN | PUD_TABLE_AF;
> >  	unsigned int step = PMD_SIZE >> PAGE_SHIFT;
> > @@ -638,7 +665,7 @@ static int split_pud(pud_t *pudp, pud_t pud, gfp_t gfp, bool to_cont)
> >  	pmd_t *pmdp;
> >  	int i;
> >
> > -	pmd_phys = pgd_pgtable_alloc_init_mm_gfp(TABLE_PMD, gfp);
> > +	pmd_phys = pgtable_alloc_fn(TABLE_PMD);
> >  	if (pmd_phys == INVALID_PHYS_ADDR)
> >  		return -ENOMEM;
> >  	pmdp = (pmd_t *)phys_to_virt(pmd_phys);
> > @@ -707,7 +734,7 @@ static int split_kernel_leaf_mapping_locked(unsigned long addr)
> >  	if (!pud_present(pud))
> >  		goto out;
> >  	if (pud_leaf(pud)) {
> > -		ret = split_pud(pudp, pud, GFP_PGTABLE_KERNEL, true);
> > +		ret = split_pud(pudp, pud, pgd_pgtable_alloc_init_mm, true);
> >  		if (ret)
> >  			goto out;
> >  	}
> > @@ -732,7 +759,7 @@ static int split_kernel_leaf_mapping_locked(unsigned long addr)
> >  		 */
> >  		if (ALIGN_DOWN(addr, PMD_SIZE) == addr)
> >  			goto out;
> > -		ret = split_pmd(pmdp, pmd, GFP_PGTABLE_KERNEL, true);
> > +		ret = split_pmd(pmdp, pmd, pgd_pgtable_alloc_init_mm, true);
> >  		if (ret)
> >  			goto out;
> >  	}
> > @@ -831,34 +858,35 @@ int split_kernel_leaf_mapping(unsigned long start, unsigned long end)
> >  static int split_to_ptes_pud_entry(pud_t *pudp, unsigned long addr,
> >  				   unsigned long next, struct mm_walk *walk)
> >  {
> > -	gfp_t gfp = *(gfp_t *)walk->private;
> > +	split_pgtable_alloc_fn *pgtable_alloc_fn = walk->private;
> >  	pud_t pud = pudp_get(pudp);
> > -	int ret = 0;
> >
> > -	if (pud_leaf(pud))
> > -		ret = split_pud(pudp, pud, gfp, false);
> > +	if (!pud_leaf(pud))
> > +		return 0;
> >
> > -	return ret;
> > +	return split_pud(pudp, pud, pgtable_alloc_fn, false);
>
> why are you changing the layout of this function? Seems like unneccessary churn.
> Just pass pgtable_alloc to split_pud() instead of gfp.
>
> >  }
> >
> >  static int split_to_ptes_pmd_entry(pmd_t *pmdp, unsigned long addr,
> >  				   unsigned long next, struct mm_walk *walk)
> >  {
> > -	gfp_t gfp = *(gfp_t *)walk->private;
> > +	split_pgtable_alloc_fn *pgtable_alloc_fn = walk->private;
> >  	pmd_t pmd = pmdp_get(pmdp);
> > -	int ret = 0;
> > +	int ret;
> >
> > -	if (pmd_leaf(pmd)) {
> > -		if (pmd_cont(pmd))
> > -			split_contpmd(pmdp);
> > -		ret = split_pmd(pmdp, pmd, gfp, false);
> > +	if (!pmd_leaf(pmd))
> > +		return 0;
> >
> > -		/*
> > -		 * We have split the pmd directly to ptes so there is no need to
> > -		 * visit each pte to check if they are contpte.
> > -		 */
> > -		walk->action = ACTION_CONTINUE;
> > -	}
> > +	if (pmd_cont(pmd))
> > +		split_contpmd(pmdp);
> > +
> > +	ret = split_pmd(pmdp, pmd, pgtable_alloc_fn, false);
> > +
> > +	/*
> > +	 * We have split the pmd directly to ptes so there is no need to
> > +	 * visit each pte to check if they are contpte.
> > +	 */
> > +	walk->action = ACTION_CONTINUE;
>
> Same comment; no need to change the layout of the function.

Okay. I'll keep the former layout.

>
> >
> >  	return ret;
> >  }
> > @@ -880,13 +908,15 @@ static const struct mm_walk_ops split_to_ptes_ops = {
> >  	.pte_entry	= split_to_ptes_pte_entry,
> >  };
> >
> > -static int range_split_to_ptes(unsigned long start, unsigned long end, gfp_t gfp)
> > +static int range_split_to_ptes(unsigned long start, unsigned long end,
> > +			       split_pgtable_alloc_fn *pgtable_alloc_fn)
> >  {
> >  	int ret;
> >
> >  	arch_enter_lazy_mmu_mode();
> >  	ret = walk_kernel_page_table_range_lockless(start, end,
> > -					&split_to_ptes_ops, NULL, &gfp);
> > +						    &split_to_ptes_ops, NULL,
> > +						    pgtable_alloc_fn);
> >  	arch_leave_lazy_mmu_mode();
> >
> >  	return ret;
> > @@ -903,6 +933,105 @@ static void __init init_idmap_kpti_bbml2_flag(void)
> >  	smp_mb();
> >  }
> >
> > +static int __init
> > +collect_to_split_pud_entry(pud_t *pudp, unsigned long addr,
> > +			   unsigned long next, struct mm_walk *walk)
> > +{
> > +	pud_t pud = pudp_get(pudp);
> > +
> > +	if (pud_leaf(pud))
> > +		split_pgtables_count += 1 + PTRS_PER_PMD;
>
> I think you probably want:
>
> 	walk->action = ACTION_CONTINUE;
>
> Likely you will end up with the same behaviour regardless. But you should at
> least we consistent with collect_to_split_pmd_entry().

This is my fault to miss here. Thanks for catching this :)

>
> > +
> > +	return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int __init
> > +collect_to_split_pmd_entry(pmd_t *pmdp, unsigned long addr,
> > +			   unsigned long next, struct mm_walk *walk)
> > +{
> > +	pmd_t pmd = pmdp_get(pmdp);
> > +
> > +	if (pmd_leaf(pmd))
> > +		split_pgtables_count++;
> > +
> > +	walk->action = ACTION_CONTINUE;
> > +
> > +	return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static void __init linear_map_free_split_pgtables(void)
> > +{
> > +	int i;
> > +
> > +	if (!split_pgtables_count || !split_pgtables)
> > +		goto skip_free;
> > +
> > +	for (i = split_pgtables_idx; i < split_pgtables_count; i++) {
> > +		if (split_pgtables[i])
> > +			pagetable_free(split_pgtables[i]);
> > +	}
> > +
> > +	free_pages((unsigned long)split_pgtables, split_pgtables_order);
> > +
> > +skip_free:
> > +	split_pgtables = NULL;
> > +	split_pgtables_count = 0;
> > +	split_pgtables_idx = 0;
> > +	split_pgtables_order = 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int __init linear_map_prealloc_split_pgtables(void)
> > +{
> > +	int ret, i;
> > +	unsigned long lstart = _PAGE_OFFSET(vabits_actual);
> > +	unsigned long lend = PAGE_END;
> > +	unsigned long kstart = (unsigned long)lm_alias(_stext);
> > +	unsigned long kend = (unsigned long)lm_alias(__init_begin);
> > +
> > +	const struct mm_walk_ops collect_to_split_ops = {
> > +		.pud_entry	= collect_to_split_pud_entry,
> > +		.pmd_entry	= collect_to_split_pmd_entry
> > +	};
> > +
> > +	split_pgtables_idx = 0;
> > +	split_pgtables_count = 0;
> > +
> > +	ret = walk_kernel_page_table_range_lockless(lstart, kstart,
> > +						    &collect_to_split_ops,
> > +						    NULL, NULL);
> > +	if (!ret)
> > +		ret = walk_kernel_page_table_range_lockless(kend, lend,
> > +							    &collect_to_split_ops,
> > +							    NULL, NULL);
> > +	if (ret || !split_pgtables_count)
> > +		goto error;
> > +
> > +	ret = -ENOMEM;
> > +
> > +	split_pgtables_order =
> > +		order_base_2(PAGE_ALIGN(split_pgtables_count *
> > +					sizeof(struct ptdesc *)) >> PAGE_SHIFT);
>
> Wouldn't this be simpler?
>
> 	split_pgtables_order = get_order(split_pgtables_count *
> 					 sizeof(struct ptdesc *));
>

Yes. that would be simpler. But I think we can use
kvmalloc() for split_pagtables since
linear_map_prealloc_split_pgtables() is called after mm_core_init().
So It could be dropped or Am I missing something?

> > +
> > +	split_pgtables = (struct ptdesc **) __get_free_pages(GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_ZERO,
> > +							     split_pgtables_order);
>
> Do you really need the cast? (I'm not sure).

Since, __get_free_pages() return is "unsigned long", cast is reqruied.
But as I said above, I think it could be replaced with the "kvmalloc()'
for split_pagetables.

>
> > +	if (!split_pgtables)
> > +		goto error;
> > +
> > +	for (i = 0; i < split_pgtables_count; i++) {
> > +		split_pgtables[i] = pagetable_alloc(GFP_KERNEL, 0);
>
> For consistency with other code, perhaps spell it out?:
>
> 	/* Page is zeroed by init_clear_pgtable() so don't duplicate effort. */
> 	gfp_t gfp = GFP_PGTABLE_KERNEL & ~__GFP_ZERO;

Using the gfp_t gfp is fine but comments should be changed
since init_clear_pgtable() isn't use while split instead
spliting fills the pgtable with former mapped pages.

I'll use gfp with the proepr comments. Thanks!

>
> 	for (i = 0; i < split_pgtables_count; i++) {
> 		split_pgtables[i] = pagetable_alloc(gfp, 0);
>
> > +		if (!split_pgtables[i])
> > +			goto error;
> > +	}
> > +
> > +	ret = 0;
> > +
> > +error:
> > +	if (ret)
> > +		linear_map_free_split_pgtables();
> > +
> > +	return ret;
> > +}
>
> I wonder if there is value in generalizing this a bit to separate out the
> determination of the number of pages from the actual pre-allocation and free
> functions? Then you have a reusable pre-allocation function that you could also
> use for the KPTI case instead of having it have yet another private pre-allocator?

I see your last comments for this :D. I'll drop this comment.
>
> > +
> >  static int __init linear_map_split_to_ptes(void *__unused)
> >  {
> >  	/*
> > @@ -928,9 +1057,9 @@ static int __init linear_map_split_to_ptes(void *__unused)
> >  		 * PTE. The kernel alias remains static throughout runtime so
> >  		 * can continue to be safely mapped with large mappings.
> >  		 */
> > -		ret = range_split_to_ptes(lstart, kstart, GFP_ATOMIC);
> > +		ret = range_split_to_ptes(lstart, kstart, pgd_pgtable_get_preallocated);
> >  		if (!ret)
> > -			ret = range_split_to_ptes(kend, lend, GFP_ATOMIC);
> > +			ret = range_split_to_ptes(kend, lend, pgd_pgtable_get_preallocated);
> >  		if (ret)
> >  			panic("Failed to split linear map\n");
> >  		flush_tlb_kernel_range(lstart, lend);
> > @@ -963,10 +1092,16 @@ static int __init linear_map_split_to_ptes(void *__unused)
> >
> >  void __init linear_map_maybe_split_to_ptes(void)
> >  {
> > -	if (linear_map_requires_bbml2 && !system_supports_bbml2_noabort()) {
> > -		init_idmap_kpti_bbml2_flag();
> > -		stop_machine(linear_map_split_to_ptes, NULL, cpu_online_mask);
> > -	}
> > +	if (!linear_map_requires_bbml2 || system_supports_bbml2_noabort())
> > +		return;
> > +
> > +	if (linear_map_prealloc_split_pgtables())
> > +		panic("Failed to split linear map\n");
> > +
> > +	init_idmap_kpti_bbml2_flag();
> > +	stop_machine(linear_map_split_to_ptes, NULL, cpu_online_mask);
> > +
> > +	linear_map_free_split_pgtables();
> >  }
> >
> >  /*
> > @@ -1088,6 +1223,7 @@ bool arch_kfence_init_pool(void)
> >  	unsigned long end = start + KFENCE_POOL_SIZE;
> >  	int ret;
> >
> > +
>
> nit: Remove extra empty line.

Okay. I'll remove it.

>
> This is looking much cleaner now; nearly there!

Thanks for your detail review!

>
> Thanks,
> Ryan
>
>
> >  	/* Exit early if we know the linear map is already pte-mapped. */
> >  	if (!split_leaf_mapping_possible())
> >  		return true;
> > @@ -1097,7 +1233,7 @@ bool arch_kfence_init_pool(void)
> >  		return true;
> >
> >  	mutex_lock(&pgtable_split_lock);
> > -	ret = range_split_to_ptes(start, end, GFP_PGTABLE_KERNEL);
> > +	ret = range_split_to_ptes(start, end, pgd_pgtable_alloc_init_mm);
> >  	mutex_unlock(&pgtable_split_lock);
> >
> >  	/*
>

--
Sincerely,
Yeoreum Yun


  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-01-02 12:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-12-18 19:47 [PATCH v3 0/2] fix wrong usage of memory allocation APIs under PREEMPT_RT in arm64 Yeoreum Yun
2025-12-18 19:47 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] arm64: mmu: avoid allocating pages while splitting the linear mapping Yeoreum Yun
2026-01-02 11:03   ` Ryan Roberts
2026-01-02 11:09     ` Ryan Roberts
2026-01-02 12:21     ` Yeoreum Yun [this message]
2026-01-02 12:35       ` Ryan Roberts
2025-12-18 19:47 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] arm64: mmu: avoid allocating pages while installing ng-mapping for KPTI Yeoreum Yun
2026-01-02 11:10   ` Ryan Roberts
2026-01-02 14:48     ` Yeoreum Yun
2025-12-31 10:07 ` [PATCH v3 0/2] fix wrong usage of memory allocation APIs under PREEMPT_RT in arm64 Yeoreum Yun
2025-12-31 12:34   ` David Hildenbrand (Red Hat)

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=aVe4SmuU1arLs14O@e129823.arm.com \
    --to=yeoreum.yun@arm.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=ardb@kernel.org \
    --cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=chaitanyas.prakash@arm.com \
    --cc=clrkwllms@kernel.org \
    --cc=david@kernel.org \
    --cc=dev.jain@arm.com \
    --cc=jackmanb@google.com \
    --cc=kevin.brodsky@arm.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-rt-devel@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com \
    --cc=mhocko@suse.com \
    --cc=quic_zhenhuah@quicinc.com \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=ryan.roberts@arm.com \
    --cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    --cc=yang@os.amperecomputing.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).