From: Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@arm.com>
To: Marek Vasut <marek.vasut+renesas@mailbox.org>
Cc: arm-scmi@vger.kernel.org, "Rob Herring (Arm)" <robh@kernel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@kernel.org>,
Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@arm.com>,
Florian Fainelli <florian.fainelli@broadcom.com>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@kernel.org>,
Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] dt-bindings: firmware: arm,scmi: Document arm,no-completion-irq property
Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2026 16:53:45 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aW5hmb9tyw1Gv388@pluto> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260117010241.186685-1-marek.vasut+renesas@mailbox.org>
On Sat, Jan 17, 2026 at 02:02:28AM +0100, Marek Vasut wrote:
> Document new property arm,no-completion-irq . This optional property
> is intended for hardware that does not generate completion interrupts
> and can be used to unconditionally enable forced polling mode of
> operation.
>
> With this property set, such implementations which do not generate
> interrupts can be interacted with, until they are fixed to generate
> interrupts properly.
>
> Note that, because the original base protocol exchange also requires
> some sort of completion mechanism, it is not possible to query SCMI
> itself for this property and it must be described in DT. While this
> does look a bit like policy, the SCMI provider is part of the
> hardware, hence DT.
>
> Reviewed-by: Rob Herring (Arm) <robh@kernel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut <marek.vasut+renesas@mailbox.org>
> ---
> Cc: Conor Dooley <conor+dt@kernel.org>
> Cc: Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@arm.com>
> Cc: Florian Fainelli <florian.fainelli@broadcom.com>
> Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@kernel.org>
> Cc: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
> Cc: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
> Cc: arm-scmi@vger.kernel.org
> Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org
> Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
> Cc: linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org
> ---
> V2: s@mean@&t and limit poll transport to mailbox/shmem only
> V3: - Reformat the commit message, expand property description to
> explicitly spell out this is hardware description.
> - Rename property from arm,poll-transport to arm,no-completion-irq
> V4: - Update first paragraph of commit message and property description
> - Add RB from Rob
> ---
> .../devicetree/bindings/firmware/arm,scmi.yaml | 10 ++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/firmware/arm,scmi.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/firmware/arm,scmi.yaml
> index be817fd9cc34b..d06cca9273c48 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/firmware/arm,scmi.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/firmware/arm,scmi.yaml
> @@ -146,6 +146,13 @@ properties:
> this platform. If set, the value should be non-zero.
> minimum: 1
>
> + arm,no-completion-irq:
> + type: boolean
> + description:
Shouldn't these two points have to be swapped as per Sudeep and Rob
suggestions ?
description:
....
type: boolean
> + This optional property is intended for hardware that does not generate
> + completion interrupts and can be used to unconditionally enable forced
> + polling mode of operation.
> +
> arm,smc-id:
> $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/uint32
> description:
> @@ -379,6 +386,9 @@ then:
> - shmem
>
> else:
> + properties:
> + arm,no-completion-irq: false
> +
> if:
> properties:
With the above corrected, LGTM.
Reviewed-by: Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@arm.com>
Thanks,
Cristian
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-01-19 16:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-01-17 1:02 [PATCH v4 1/2] dt-bindings: firmware: arm,scmi: Document arm,no-completion-irq property Marek Vasut
2026-01-17 1:02 ` [PATCH v4 2/2] firmware: arm_scmi: Implement " Marek Vasut
2026-01-19 16:57 ` Cristian Marussi
2026-02-09 10:53 ` Marek Vasut
2026-02-09 10:56 ` Wolfram Sang
2026-02-09 13:00 ` Cristian Marussi
2026-02-09 15:44 ` Sudeep Holla
2026-02-09 16:19 ` Marek Vasut
2026-02-10 11:11 ` Wolfram Sang
2026-01-19 16:53 ` Cristian Marussi [this message]
2026-01-19 17:02 ` [PATCH v4 1/2] dt-bindings: firmware: arm,scmi: Document " Sudeep Holla
2026-01-21 2:05 ` Rob Herring
2026-01-19 19:00 ` Marek Vasut
2026-03-09 9:10 ` Sudeep Holla
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aW5hmb9tyw1Gv388@pluto \
--to=cristian.marussi@arm.com \
--cc=arm-scmi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=florian.fainelli@broadcom.com \
--cc=krzk+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=marek.vasut+renesas@mailbox.org \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=sudeep.holla@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox