From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 855B4D2ED0F for ; Tue, 20 Jan 2026 10:55:31 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender:List-Subscribe:List-Help :List-Post:List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:Content-Type: MIME-Version:References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=NCA6Ur5hIE6inG+4oWduB7f+Tpmbjrg6xA88T96dz9c=; b=xTT6qDvj1NwaougdCvHITQiXld 8Oduvl+f/wUoD/VyhLFRmbS+ci07k3xbkEzmjskYej69VpfEMC5XusXVkDF8Z/EcwliD/ndzaAePi XAXs2d03rPZLL6DIvAHehe2PPL1cs38+wwUQLj5l5tzr/WLyN+mFQHhmtb/n8x9iS5gayIM1Ei8HW sm8x5zBsyt0bH708g/M0ZU4g/QGJDohZAgeTKgU1+AFA7LQbSIiJr+bvuu2zewgw7tM2s8ntDOZFN OoMS+MzB5u1u1NCTc6ohuURfZ7gOU5w5xYt6sIidrPTmVijmKPMUmqkho8+fA1YXitHtmsk8od1G3 wF4Ypwmw==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.98.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1vi9OQ-00000003etZ-2YXx; Tue, 20 Jan 2026 10:55:26 +0000 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.110.172]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.98.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1vi9OM-00000003esm-3sdi for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Tue, 20 Jan 2026 10:55:25 +0000 Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CAAE31476; Tue, 20 Jan 2026 02:55:14 -0800 (PST) Received: from pluto (usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com [172.31.20.19]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 34F293F740; Tue, 20 Jan 2026 02:55:19 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2026 10:55:12 +0000 From: Cristian Marussi To: Dhruva Gole Cc: Jonathan Cameron , Cristian Marussi , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, arm-scmi@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, sudeep.holla@arm.com, james.quinlan@broadcom.com, f.fainelli@gmail.com, vincent.guittot@linaro.org, etienne.carriere@st.com, peng.fan@oss.nxp.com, michal.simek@amd.com, dan.carpenter@linaro.org, elif.topuz@arm.com, lukasz.luba@arm.com, philip.radford@arm.com, souvik.chakravarty@arm.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 01/17] firmware: arm_scmi: Define a common SCMI_MAX_PROTOCOLS value Message-ID: References: <20260114114638.2290765-1-cristian.marussi@arm.com> <20260114114638.2290765-2-cristian.marussi@arm.com> <20260119111827.00001704@huawei.com> <20260120064419.by4nvmdgdybwe76q@lcpd911> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20260120064419.by4nvmdgdybwe76q@lcpd911> X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20260120_025523_011434_54CF7B56 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 15.21 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Tue, Jan 20, 2026 at 12:14:19PM +0530, Dhruva Gole wrote: > On Jan 19, 2026 at 11:18:27 +0000, Jonathan Cameron wrote: > > On Wed, 14 Jan 2026 11:46:05 +0000 > > Cristian Marussi wrote: > > > > > Add a common definition of SCMI_MAX_PROTOCOLS and use it all over the > > > SCMI stack. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Cristian Marussi > > Hi Cristian, > > > > Mention the introduction of SCMI_PROTOCOL_LAST in the patch description > > and probably say why it takes that value (which is much less than > > the SCMI_MAX_PROTOCOLS value). > > Rather I wonder why even add it? Is it just like a documentation/ marker > or is some other usage even planned for it? It was a cleanup related to some changes that I then dropped from this public series...I kept it since it seemed fine, but I will definitely drop it in V3 since it is no more related or needed by anything in this series. Thanks, Cristian