public inbox for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
To: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Cc: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	Mahe Tardy <mahe.tardy@gmail.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	bpf@vger.kernel.org, linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, x86@kernel.org,
	Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>, Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>,
	Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 bpf-next 1/2] arm64/ftrace,bpf: Fix partial regs after bpf_prog_run
Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2026 13:47:23 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <aWEG685zlaV0o7M7@willie-the-truck> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260109093454.389295-1-jolsa@kernel.org>

On Fri, Jan 09, 2026 at 10:34:53AM +0100, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> Mahe reported issue with bpf_override_return helper not working when
> executed from kprobe.multi bpf program on arm.
> 
> The problem is that on arm we use alternate storage for pt_regs object
> that is passed to bpf_prog_run and if any register is changed (which
> is the case of bpf_override_return) it's not propagated back to actual
> pt_regs object.
> 
> Fixing this by introducing and calling ftrace_partial_regs_update function
> to propagate the values of changed registers (ip and stack).
> 
> Reported-by: Mahe Tardy <mahe.tardy@gmail.com>
> Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
> ---
> v2 changes:
> - moved ftrace_partial_regs_update to generic code [Will]
> 
>  include/linux/ftrace_regs.h | 25 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c    |  1 +
>  2 files changed, 26 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/include/linux/ftrace_regs.h b/include/linux/ftrace_regs.h
> index 15627ceea9bc..f9a7c009cdae 100644
> --- a/include/linux/ftrace_regs.h
> +++ b/include/linux/ftrace_regs.h
> @@ -33,6 +33,31 @@ struct ftrace_regs;
>  #define ftrace_regs_get_frame_pointer(fregs) \
>  	frame_pointer(&arch_ftrace_regs(fregs)->regs)
>  
> +static __always_inline void
> +ftrace_partial_regs_update(const struct ftrace_regs *fregs, struct pt_regs *regs) { }
> +
> +#else
> +
> +/*
> + * ftrace_partial_regs_update - update the original ftrace_regs from regs
> + * @fregs: The ftrace_regs to update from @regs
> + * @regs: The partial regs from ftrace_partial_regs() that was updated
> + *
> + * Some architectures have the partial regs living in the ftrace_regs
> + * structure, whereas other architectures need to make a different copy
> + * of the @regs. If a partial @regs is retrieved by ftrace_partial_regs() and
> + * if the code using @regs updates a field (like the instruction pointer or
> + * stack pointer) it may need to propagate that change to the original @fregs
> + * it retrieved the partial @regs from. Use this function to guarantee that
> + * update happens.
> + */
> +static __always_inline void
> +ftrace_partial_regs_update(const struct ftrace_regs *fregs, struct pt_regs *regs)
> +{
> +	ftrace_regs_set_instruction_pointer(fregs, instruction_pointer(regs));
> +	ftrace_regs_set_return_value(fregs, regs_return_value(regs));
> +}

I think the AI thingy is right about dropping the const qualifier here
but overall I prefer this to the previous revisions. Thanks for sticking
with it!

Acked-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>

Will


  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-01-09 13:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-01-09  9:34 [PATCHv2 bpf-next 1/2] arm64/ftrace,bpf: Fix partial regs after bpf_prog_run Jiri Olsa
2026-01-09  9:34 ` [PATCHv2 bpf-next 2/2] selftests/bpf: Add test for bpf_override_return helper Jiri Olsa
2026-01-09 10:00 ` [PATCHv2 bpf-next 1/2] arm64/ftrace,bpf: Fix partial regs after bpf_prog_run bot+bpf-ci
2026-01-09 13:47 ` Will Deacon [this message]
2026-01-09 16:19   ` Steven Rostedt
2026-01-10 17:06   ` Jiri Olsa
2026-01-09 16:18 ` Steven Rostedt

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=aWEG685zlaV0o7M7@willie-the-truck \
    --to=will@kernel.org \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mahe.tardy@gmail.com \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=mhiramat@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=songliubraving@fb.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    --cc=yhs@fb.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox