From: Anton Protopopov <a.s.protopopov@gmail.com>
To: Xu Kuohai <xukuohai@huaweicloud.com>
Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@linux.dev>,
Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>,
Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>,
Puranjay Mohan <puranjay@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v4 1/4] bpf: Fix an off-by-one error in check_indirect_jump
Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2026 10:29:44 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aWdwGKLsL7G7IQ3z@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260114093914.2403982-2-xukuohai@huaweicloud.com>
On 26/01/14 05:39PM, Xu Kuohai wrote:
> From: Xu Kuohai <xukuohai@huawei.com>
>
> Fix an off-by-one error in check_indirect_jump() that skips the last
> element returned by copy_insn_array_uniq().
>
> Fixes: 493d9e0d6083 ("bpf, x86: add support for indirect jumps")
> Signed-off-by: Xu Kuohai <xukuohai@huawei.com>
> ---
> kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
> index faa1ecc1fe9d..22605d9e0ffa 100644
> --- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
> +++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
> @@ -20336,7 +20336,7 @@ static int check_indirect_jump(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_insn *in
> return -EINVAL;
> }
>
> - for (i = 0; i < n - 1; i++) {
> + for (i = 0; i < n; i++) {
> other_branch = push_stack(env, env->gotox_tmp_buf->items[i],
> env->insn_idx, env->cur_state->speculative);
> if (IS_ERR(other_branch))
> --
> 2.47.3
Nack, the last state doesn't require a push_stack() call, it is
verified directly under this loop. Instead of this patch, just
add another call to mark_indirect_target().
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-01-14 10:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-01-14 9:39 [PATCH bpf-next v4 0/4] emit ENDBR/BTI instructions for indirect jump targets Xu Kuohai
2026-01-14 9:39 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 1/4] bpf: Fix an off-by-one error in check_indirect_jump Xu Kuohai
2026-01-14 10:29 ` Anton Protopopov [this message]
2026-01-15 7:31 ` Xu Kuohai
2026-01-14 9:39 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 2/4] bpf: Add helper to detect indirect jump targets Xu Kuohai
2026-01-14 11:00 ` Anton Protopopov
2026-01-15 7:37 ` Xu Kuohai
2026-01-14 20:46 ` Eduard Zingerman
2026-01-15 7:47 ` Xu Kuohai
2026-01-18 17:20 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2026-01-18 23:22 ` Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2026-01-19 2:35 ` Xu Kuohai
2026-01-14 9:39 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 3/4] bpf, x86: Emit ENDBR for " Xu Kuohai
2026-01-14 16:46 ` kernel test robot
2026-01-14 9:39 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 4/4] bpf, arm64: Emit BTI for indirect jump target Xu Kuohai
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aWdwGKLsL7G7IQ3z@mail.gmail.com \
--to=a.s.protopopov@gmail.com \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
--cc=puranjay@kernel.org \
--cc=xukuohai@huaweicloud.com \
--cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox