From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EAE87D37E46 for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2026 15:22:36 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender:List-Subscribe:List-Help :List-Post:List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:Content-Type: MIME-Version:References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=E4Fbp1gWprjaWwTIF67PnzL6ErW/s4uVu2YzVoPvCqc=; b=CNSWagdZh15DAu7tXwuLITAcnx xkNwd9adhm0YM5V5E25w8tS2jSTR3JWvQVYmP54Jq9v1nB83ahjOI11u4D+5kMryBT78NNxLUzMak aiGCayO0lHKoBBJERJbn49FoLt+zNHbrJZjR53//OZ9JBPcRrKad6iS48MDB8nbP65asWu/nRoXVE PkoHmMPL9ctQdyn5n6oTQuowQbDG98NXCWiuSDXT6ZWgYbbSvKZfKVLstbUkTvbOnMFqW/VIi1lO/ yY8Uv4PXTP5wsXpavWyjpzCK4K3DN90I1BKUabVZGvsbWimUeqgn4rgnSaJacRPhxZRouHQ2jx3j0 0q3KXWhA==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.98.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1vg2hY-00000009fTs-0FDB; Wed, 14 Jan 2026 15:22:28 +0000 Received: from zeus03.de ([194.117.254.33] helo=mail.zeus03.de) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.98.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1vg2hS-00000009fRe-1tFZ for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Wed, 14 Jan 2026 15:22:24 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= sang-engineering.com; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id :references:mime-version:content-type:in-reply-to; s=k1; bh=E4Fb p1gWprjaWwTIF67PnzL6ErW/s4uVu2YzVoPvCqc=; b=bBclkT4UKNVbybJbFbtT 2IDSjfq04crf0WEXCzSgltWp6wpqj0IOcdpzcamA3rcrrPUCv+MNqmhDSkzgCpG2 yyUwkpFnxeiwWAsDNIjvzpXCnAKA7CfPCL6C/npvQA4uZy1ffvHBROEEWiILU9LQ T5fieVkn9r7JIKV3w9VndZef1veocFlhmQAS4lhzcPxSvtPjH272MMONUlJRjdJp 0oBKq5rFA2R7i8VND/Ovz3Osry5WRtbS33bnNHtrOtvIqUGOXGrACp1MRRFz7UDn VR5kCfSzjz3kuQKrzSlOZBOoYuNaAEV9BRlqH5T7WrM24MhSiotV6b5jeW1eXHro 5w== Received: (qmail 2192941 invoked from network); 14 Jan 2026 16:22:18 +0100 Received: by mail.zeus03.de with UTF8SMTPSA (TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 encrypted, authenticated); 14 Jan 2026 16:22:18 +0100 X-UD-Smtp-Session: l3s3148p1@2rR5rFpIEqgujnsM Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2026 16:22:17 +0100 From: Wolfram Sang To: Bartosz Golaszewski Cc: Bartosz Golaszewski , Andi Shyti , Chen-Yu Tsai , Jernej Skrabec , Samuel Holland , Khalil Blaiech , Asmaa Mnebhi , Jean Delvare , Madhavan Srinivasan , Michael Ellerman , Nicholas Piggin , "Christophe Leroy (CS GROUP)" , Andreas =?utf-8?Q?F=C3=A4rber?= , Manivannan Sadhasivam , linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-sunxi@lists.linux.dev, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-actions@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/12] i2c: add and start using i2c_adapter-specific printk helpers Message-ID: References: <20251223-i2c-printk-helpers-v1-0-46a08306afdb@oss.qualcomm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20260114_072223_364149_BB1B1FD5 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 13.37 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org > FYI: I think the road-map will look something like this: v7.1 will get > new interfaces and most controllers under drivers/i2c/ converted as > this can be done within your tree exclusively. For v7.2 (with the new > interfaces upstream) we can think about converting all i2c controller > drivers treewide to the new helpers. Once v7.2-rc1 is tagged, I would > try to remove struct device from struct i2c_adapter locally and send > it to autobuilders for testing. If that goes well, we could create > struct i2c_adapter_private or something like this and store its > address in struct i2c_adapter. This new struct would be controlled by > i2c core and contain struct device. With that out of the way, for v7.4 > we could think about adding SRCU into the mix (possibly using the > then-available revocable). > > If all goes well, we should be done in early 2027. :) With this plan, what could possibly go wrong? :)