From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 19F2DD38FEF for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2026 17:03:27 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender:List-Subscribe:List-Help :List-Post:List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:MIME-Version:References:Message-ID: Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=jHGJVATtAFo2voa3lOA4ga20tNFdaMhofWUR8pM0xUA=; b=EsvTelPPow8nQcP52r+mEVgQbe 2ITxe8fyzkRiSqkWAci57P+X5w+mpqQZfLdU0h1UoJWQkgbUqG7ZFNXUzAKAOK1spI7K7Pb9/UcRP k9Tv3lKmlGCPb5BH0BLNdGuaULdFjjEgygtCUyJk511gZVY8sQWHduRxwV9W0C7Lp/lW00S/MEiJT K/48hOjVG9RlkhnbIHM4vVt0Sw9ZqxmFEG6AsMZHnXi+nemE+GcIJmcXZn5TBIwXdTpWZXnyxSMK5 dUwd8jnIAPHZgdS7xgwh9d6+uQvA6k7F+WI2+urkD3lWnpHa4+ZuAVX8cFNlFjhSS8R0fUYy/BoVQ Nt3X64Rw==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.98.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1vg4H9-0000000A27G-0qBv; Wed, 14 Jan 2026 17:03:19 +0000 Received: from tor.source.kernel.org ([2600:3c04:e001:324:0:1991:8:25]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.98.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1vg4H8-0000000A26y-01Ik for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Wed, 14 Jan 2026 17:03:18 +0000 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (transwarp.subspace.kernel.org [100.75.92.58]) by tor.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1599F6001A; Wed, 14 Jan 2026 17:03:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 719FFC4CEF7; Wed, 14 Jan 2026 17:03:13 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1768410196; bh=tbOQiaRsx985jHNtRaNVTBPCED2t5Ue5EhyntK5pH6g=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=jyppVcgrGQZ1NBONlc4fpePseUDyJJ5N6Yy1rFPXWoRD9W2pnQjhQNzPNvWnOxBCb G1t0jtfLWEDR6MbsfgstatxJPWC9XvqhLnH3fCLwNktUz9dwOxOCa7QpAfAuNQL5md ygkbJjx3EBgBIXKPBS6lD39Fe9MZQhTUvRGTHu/CupCMqWIjAhmKbAJ+eB45ofOZlf zWyX1a4qZcJeYuL5gy+CdLM4Vm1Zi/TdnPhErIEZb/DgQvi51QJD+IUS+8c9oIF4pD kpAiVjPGipG1q6REbWLFgrzjvJqEfHi0+Ya+MvL5OSfEL3eMsw9DQ3jQ9FVVHrdRs0 8UY5o/VIqnWUg== Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2026 18:03:10 +0100 From: Lorenzo Pieralisi To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Cc: Len Brown , Robert Moore , Thomas Gleixner , Hanjun Guo , Sudeep Holla , Marc Zyngier , Bjorn Helgaas , linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, acpica-devel@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, Jose Marinho Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/7] irqchip/gic-v5: Code first ACPI boot support Message-ID: References: <20251218-gicv5-host-acpi-v2-0-eec76cd1d40b@kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Wed, Jan 14, 2026 at 04:56:53PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Thu, Dec 18, 2025 at 11:15 AM Lorenzo Pieralisi > wrote: > > > > The ACPI and ACPI IORT specifications were updated to support bindings > > required to describe GICv5 based systems. > > > > The ACPI specification GICv5 bindings ECR [1] were approved and the > > required changes merged in the ACPICA upstream repository[5]. > > > > The Arm IORT specification [2] has been updated to include GICv5 IWB > > specific bindings in revision E.g. > > > > Implement kernel code that - based on the aforementioned bindings - adds > > support for GICv5 ACPI probing. > > > > ACPICA changes supporting the bindings are posted with the series; they > > were cherry-picked from the upcoming ACPICA Linuxised release patches > > and they should _not_ be merged in any upstream branch because the > > full set of Linuxised ACPICA changes will be subsequently posted in > > order to be merged, I added the two ACPICA patches to make the series > > self-contained. > > The patches in question have been included in this series: > > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-acpi/12822121.O9o76ZdvQC@rafael.j.wysocki/ > > and are going to be applied shortly. Thanks Rafael, I will rebase the series and mark the dependency then. Lorenzo