public inbox for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
To: "Thomas Weißschuh" <linux@weissschuh.net>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>, Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kselftest/arm64: Use syscall() macro over nolibc my_syscall()
Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2026 15:16:36 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <aWz5VDoGPiOrfsTN@sirena.co.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260117-nolibc-mysyscall-arm64-v1-1-f70266a3db15@weissschuh.net>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 646 bytes --]

On Sat, Jan 17, 2026 at 01:10:51PM +0100, Thomas Weißschuh wrote:
> The my_syscall*() macros are internal implementation details of nolibc.
> Nolibc also provides the regular syscall(2), which is also a macro
> and directly expands to the correct my_syscall().
> 
> Use syscall() instead.
> 
> As a side-effect this fixes some return value checks, as my_syscall()
> returns the raw value as set by the kernel and does not set errno.

Acked-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>

Looking at the history the nolibc syscall() was added after we started
doing this in the arm64 selftests, it was 2023 while the tpidr2 test
is from 2022.

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2026-01-18 15:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-01-17 12:10 [PATCH] kselftest/arm64: Use syscall() macro over nolibc my_syscall() Thomas Weißschuh
2026-01-18 15:16 ` Mark Brown [this message]
2026-01-22 16:59 ` Will Deacon

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=aWz5VDoGPiOrfsTN@sirena.co.uk \
    --to=broonie@kernel.org \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@weissschuh.net \
    --cc=shuah@kernel.org \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox