From: Liviu Dudau <liviu.dudau@arm.com>
To: Felix Gu <ustc.gu@gmail.com>
Cc: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>,
Lorenzo Pieralisi <lpieralisi@kernel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] bus: vexpress-config: Fix device node reference leak in probe
Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2026 13:30:52 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aXImjNHQMeqMbcAu@e142607> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260122-b4-vexpress-config-v1-1-3f0c85bc4730@gmail.com>
Hello,
On Thu, Jan 22, 2026 at 08:33:04PM +0800, Felix Gu wrote:
> In vexpress_syscfg_probe(), of_parse_phandle() is called inside a loop
> but the returned device_node reference is never released.
> Fix this by using the __free(device_node) cleanup handler to automatically
> release the reference when the variable goes out of scope.
>
> Fixes: a5a38765ac79b ("bus: vexpress-config: simplify config bus probing")
> Signed-off-by: Felix Gu <ustc.gu@gmail.com>
> ---
> drivers/bus/vexpress-config.c | 6 +++---
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/bus/vexpress-config.c b/drivers/bus/vexpress-config.c
> index 64ee920721ee..a1fa583e9f5d 100644
> --- a/drivers/bus/vexpress-config.c
> +++ b/drivers/bus/vexpress-config.c
> @@ -4,6 +4,7 @@
> * Copyright (C) 2014 ARM Limited
> */
>
> +#include <linux/cleanup.h>
Not sure this is needed. of.h includes cleanup.h, so we don't run the risk of
not getting the cleanup macros defined.
> #include <linux/err.h>
> #include <linux/init.h>
> #include <linux/io.h>
> @@ -390,9 +391,8 @@ static int vexpress_syscfg_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> }
>
> for_each_compatible_node(node, NULL, "arm,vexpress,config-bus") {
> - struct device_node *bridge_np;
> -
> - bridge_np = of_parse_phandle(node, "arm,vexpress,config-bridge", 0);
> + struct device_node *bridge_np __free(device_node) =
> + of_parse_phandle(node, "arm,vexpress,config-bridge", 0);
> if (bridge_np != pdev->dev.parent->of_node)
> continue;
>
Otherwise, patch looks good to me. Thanks for the fix!
Acked-by: Liviu Dudau <liviu.dudau@arm.com>
Best regards,
Liviu
>
> ---
> base-commit: 053966c344dbd346e71305f530e91ea77916189f
> change-id: 20260122-b4-vexpress-config-1d2051861d93
>
> Best regards,
> --
> Felix Gu <ustc.gu@gmail.com>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-01-22 13:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-01-22 12:33 [PATCH] bus: vexpress-config: Fix device node reference leak in probe Felix Gu
2026-01-22 13:30 ` Liviu Dudau [this message]
2026-01-22 15:54 ` Felix Gu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aXImjNHQMeqMbcAu@e142607 \
--to=liviu.dudau@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lpieralisi@kernel.org \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=sudeep.holla@arm.com \
--cc=ustc.gu@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox