From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E3FB8E81BB1 for ; Mon, 9 Feb 2026 13:00:47 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender:List-Subscribe:List-Help :List-Post:List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:Content-Type: MIME-Version:References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=u0Vs3CepAoW7NtQP5h6fcv75QVlYCjWaD6tnDhXSW7M=; b=zOqm9uuxa/6ku6ENrseU1Trj1w PeHdrMvBZN3rSWQEUm79P40QO1tcTBy6nHCj7AOjDFbEzJoLSLP9zb4/i9dUl2SRKQ4QM1fnCG3rO +uz6SdHwp6MX55x+YuQUkYbPeXXdghvX4jbhl0hI0wAIvai7/yD405EFTpFPxqnuHHGLjdLXWtL57 84bmUWk1/sDNv/1PpJTHI03e8f8jCzQZghzzcAzt6yAg+b3wDOynrj1hMIgawWVIkvCyRGuMjqtto /3kkcaH+Go4dMZhr0K+UgjZWoOZTDJZpRyml7/a6Oy0wYrwgf6HPYbTc/7qmfGAKje0ZDO8xEsOKM IrQe2WKg==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.98.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1vpQsY-0000000FOpD-2NJQ; Mon, 09 Feb 2026 13:00:38 +0000 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.110.172]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.98.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1vpQsW-0000000FOor-2lWv for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Mon, 09 Feb 2026 13:00:37 +0000 Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9AB09339; Mon, 9 Feb 2026 05:00:26 -0800 (PST) Received: from pluto (usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com [172.31.20.19]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id DCACE3F740; Mon, 9 Feb 2026 05:00:30 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2026 13:00:23 +0000 From: Cristian Marussi To: Wolfram Sang Cc: Marek Vasut , Cristian Marussi , Sudeep Holla , arm-scmi@vger.kernel.org, Conor Dooley , Florian Fainelli , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Rob Herring , devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] firmware: arm_scmi: Implement arm,no-completion-irq property Message-ID: References: <20260117010241.186685-1-marek.vasut+renesas@mailbox.org> <20260117010241.186685-2-marek.vasut+renesas@mailbox.org> <9175b8aa-18c6-4dc1-8904-c26fa1dc7428@mailbox.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20260209_050036_805902_D253D405 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 18.40 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Mon, Feb 09, 2026 at 11:56:25AM +0100, Wolfram Sang wrote: > Hi all, > > > > > Implement new property arm,no-completion-irq, which sets all SCMI > > > > operation into poll mode. This is meant to work around uncooperative > > > > SCP implementations, which do not generate completion interrupts. > > > > This applies to mbox/shmem based implementations. > > > > > > > > With this property set, such implementations which do not generate > > > > interrupts can be interacted with, until they are fixed to generate > > > > interrupts properly. > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut > > > > --- > > ... > > > > > > > LGTM. > > > > > > Reviewed-by: Cristian Marussi > > > > Is there anything left to do with these patches, or can this now be picked > > up ? > > Would love to see this going in. I also work with the firmware which > needs this functionality. I have not seen anymore push back around this, but I think it was late anyway to be picked up as an update for this cycle given that it was already -rc6 when the last series landed...so I guess it could picked up now for the next cycle ...but I have not checked with Sudeep.. Thanks, Cristian