From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 23450EA8126 for ; Tue, 10 Feb 2026 15:14:27 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender:List-Subscribe:List-Help :List-Post:List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:Content-Type: MIME-Version:References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=gomPojk6ybAu2H/648ski52YGY8aFgI0kQOhNHjdOpc=; b=v9Q2JHEDN4DnpU9vtovH/XXjN+ lTGXboI2yPZUBOpYjio8nnWe2XpvcW7lEX3BjPT4Eh+9Ux17VYaUYRJxz2E//yF74KbGGHOs+HZgx B2XUzYF5rP/g73mXuyYApV9gwQwdACwBjOEElBPKgtDnh6MpzlkRV597vflJggw5wpuhHH77JOOFc 2g2SlL4SeI//aJ66siA4ga2yckCnCODOuwrgEXzQQIyXRSoSqZNtpIdvG8dAAOnFae3B5W50PkXFz 6neJ3n/WWsUJ9NnJC4lHndJNBeaWiq4EYfAhT+Fj2MON+Cxp2A+SNfo8BGYaqJNNhArxLaVVDeNox SIgVefGg==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.98.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1vppRU-0000000H768-36tc; Tue, 10 Feb 2026 15:14:20 +0000 Received: from mgamail.intel.com ([192.198.163.11]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.98.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1vppRR-0000000H75O-33bx for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Tue, 10 Feb 2026 15:14:18 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1770736458; x=1802272458; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=5XHstcK3GNmPCCnMCyYj61+dg73mEfAPf1RQMlNT978=; b=OSQnuzSg5WZqJFW9A3B/2TlHUCGhhR4xdYEwcnexMzQOr7w2JVnGLYfe VcCZe4PEOJnJ0VrM4ZmzLnOB5W7PRV3IsHEkpgUWW0g/gRh6CExvibJ+Q grGKGqoDkzV5WrEC8LFmwMOdzAquitfP+9MPLtEkiGqUEhKBIQLPOQVNE Tl2h87ES70u+rz8y8gNDY7qPFru6eSuxlNiToJ9TUHw1Zs9wlxe4gwO6J NCy+7wG18t0rc6ntSTibCipCprWgFGCXyOIy2Yu13V4PGNGVBvsfmVtd2 HxlrKqWG+oTj44jAOQ5/7R1XuJQ8WISjgIirz7NyCtOaJUykzsTMBz/kU Q==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: AQWAkLL6SLWIFomgoor2Zw== X-CSE-MsgGUID: 4O3yQGZFQk6zDTpk7P5UVw== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6800,10657,11697"; a="82505029" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.21,283,1763452800"; d="scan'208";a="82505029" Received: from orviesa009.jf.intel.com ([10.64.159.149]) by fmvoesa105.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 10 Feb 2026 07:14:16 -0800 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: PLTW0sgvRr+sZIyjb4ObHQ== X-CSE-MsgGUID: 0j9FHxy/Qi2fCSVgALjwlg== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.21,283,1763452800"; d="scan'208";a="211778201" Received: from dalessan-mobl3.ger.corp.intel.com (HELO localhost) ([10.245.244.131]) by orviesa009-auth.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 10 Feb 2026 07:14:08 -0800 Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2026 17:14:04 +0200 From: Andy Shevchenko To: Wolfram Sang Cc: Bjorn Andersson , Baolin Wang , linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org, Alexandre Torgue , Andy Shevchenko , Antonio Borneo , Arnd Bergmann , Boqun Feng , Chen-Yu Tsai , Chunyan Zhang , Danilo Krummrich , David Lechner , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Ingo Molnar , Jernej Skrabec , Jonathan Cameron , Jonathan Corbet , Konrad Dybcio , Lee Jones , Linus Walleij , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org, linux-spi@vger.kernel.org, linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com, linux-sunxi@lists.linux.dev, Mark Brown , Maxime Coquelin , Nuno =?iso-8859-1?Q?S=E1?= , Orson Zhai , Peter Zijlstra , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Samuel Holland , Shuah Khan , Srinivas Kandagatla , Thomas Gleixner , Waiman Long , Wilken Gottwalt , Will Deacon Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/4] hwspinlock: refactor headers into public provider/consumer pair Message-ID: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - c/o Alberga Business Park, 6 krs, Bertel Jungin Aukio 5, 02600 Espoo X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20260210_071417_808562_30D67DC2 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 17.61 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Tue, Feb 10, 2026 at 11:44:25AM +0100, Wolfram Sang wrote: > > > And if so, would be this series acceptable > > > as-is then (modulo the better include-sorting mentioned by Andy)? > > > > *From my experience it's not the Q "will they or not?", the Q is "when?" > > they start abusing it. I really prefer to hide as much as possible from > > I totally agree with you on that. > > > day 1. Maybe the structure can be split to two? Currently IIO has a > > I also thought that keeping some internal header might provide that > safety. When looking into it, I didn't see an obvious and somewhat > elegant way. Even more, I got a better picture of why Bjorn named the > current approach "unergonomic". I got some ideas which look doable in my > time frame. I will try going the full route, after all. Thanks! Looking forward for the rest, the cleanup is quite good, no added lines. -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko