From: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>
To: Sergey Shtylyov <s.shtylyov@omp.ru>
Cc: linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@intel.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
Bjorn Andersson <andersson@kernel.org>,
Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com>,
linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 02/13] hwspinlock: add callback to fill private data of a hwspinlock
Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2026 09:29:07 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aZLVU9toZRX2vKX7@ninjato> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6e495cc2-3469-4855-8645-c5633d937f1e@omp.ru>
> Don't you break the existing users of this API with this change? I see
> you're fixing them up in the followup patches but that's not how it should
> be done -- the compilation shouldn't be broken...
I am not breaking them. The helper is an additional feature and the old
way still works until patch 8. Until then, all users are converted.
I built tested it :)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-02-16 8:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-02-15 22:54 [RFC v2 PATCH 00/13] hwspinlock: move device alloc into core and refactor includes Wolfram Sang
2026-02-15 22:54 ` [RFC PATCH v2 01/13] hwspinlock: add helpers to retrieve core data Wolfram Sang
2026-02-15 22:54 ` [RFC PATCH v2 02/13] hwspinlock: add callback to fill private data of a hwspinlock Wolfram Sang
2026-02-16 8:05 ` Sergey Shtylyov
2026-02-16 8:29 ` Wolfram Sang [this message]
2026-02-16 10:12 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2026-02-16 10:53 ` Wolfram Sang
2026-02-16 16:12 ` Sergey Shtylyov
2026-02-16 16:54 ` Wolfram Sang
2026-02-15 22:54 ` [RFC PATCH v2 03/13] hwspinlock: omap: use new callback to initialize hwspinlock priv Wolfram Sang
2026-02-15 22:54 ` [RFC PATCH v2 04/13] hwspinlock: qcom: " Wolfram Sang
2026-02-15 22:54 ` [RFC PATCH v2 05/13] hwspinlock: sprd: " Wolfram Sang
2026-02-15 22:54 ` [RFC PATCH v2 06/13] hwspinlock: stm32: " Wolfram Sang
2026-02-15 22:54 ` [RFC PATCH v2 07/13] hwspinlock: sun6i: " Wolfram Sang
2026-02-15 22:54 ` [RFC PATCH v2 08/13] hwspinlock: handle hwspinlock device allocation in the core Wolfram Sang
2026-02-15 22:54 ` [RFC PATCH v2 09/13] hwspinlock: move entries from internal to public header Wolfram Sang
2026-02-15 22:54 ` [RFC PATCH v2 10/13] hwspinlock: remove internal header Wolfram Sang
2026-02-15 22:54 ` [RFC PATCH v2 11/13] hwspinlock: sort include and update copyright Wolfram Sang
2026-02-15 22:54 ` [RFC PATCH v2 12/13] hwspinlock: refactor provider.h from public header Wolfram Sang
2026-02-15 22:54 ` [RFC PATCH v2 13/13] hwspinlock: refactor consumer.h " Wolfram Sang
2026-02-16 7:37 ` Andy Shevchenko
2026-02-16 16:07 ` Mark Brown
2026-02-18 19:56 ` Jonathan Cameron
2026-02-16 7:40 ` [RFC v2 PATCH 00/13] hwspinlock: move device alloc into core and refactor includes Andy Shevchenko
2026-02-16 8:34 ` Wolfram Sang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aZLVU9toZRX2vKX7@ninjato \
--to=wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com \
--cc=andersson@kernel.org \
--cc=andriy.shevchenko@intel.com \
--cc=baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=s.shtylyov@omp.ru \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox