Linux-ARM-Kernel Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Cc: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>, Fuad Tabba <tabba@google.com>,
	Oliver Upton <oupton@kernel.org>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
	Joey Gouly <joey.gouly@arm.com>,
	kvmarm@lists.linux.dev, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: pKVM breakage in mainline on n1sdp
Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2026 10:05:46 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <aZwmevKcvW2HxdJ5@J2N7QTR9R3> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aZm2XCZLYxgxL99d@sirena.co.uk>

On Sat, Feb 21, 2026 at 01:42:52PM +0000, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 21, 2026 at 10:38:05AM +0000, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> 
> > If that's vanilla 6.19, then there is post Feb 8th. Sorry for the
> > unwarranted rant.
> 
> It won't be vanilla v6.19, that specific log will be tip of Linus' tree
> from yesterday morning UK time which should be 8bf22c33e7a1 ("Merge tag
> 'net-7.0-rc1' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/netdev/net"),
> there were a few results for commits over the day prior to that showing
> the same behaviour.

Are you sure? That log says:

  CPU: 1 UID: 0 PID: 1955 Comm: qemu-system-aar Not tainted 6.19.0 #1 PREEMPT   

... where "6.19.0" means that's the 6.19 tag, and "#1" means that's the
first build against that.

Is the build system overriding things such that this is misleading?

Is there potentially a problem with the build system?

Mark.


  reply	other threads:[~2026-02-23 10:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-02-20 19:08 pKVM breakage in mainline on n1sdp Mark Brown
2026-02-21 10:33 ` Marc Zyngier
2026-02-21 10:38   ` Marc Zyngier
2026-02-21 12:35     ` Marc Zyngier
2026-02-21 13:42     ` Mark Brown
2026-02-23 10:05       ` Mark Rutland [this message]
2026-02-23 14:27         ` Mark Brown
2026-02-21 13:16   ` Mark Brown
2026-02-22  8:34   ` Fuad Tabba
2026-02-23 16:26     ` Mark Brown

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=aZwmevKcvW2HxdJ5@J2N7QTR9R3 \
    --to=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=broonie@kernel.org \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=joey.gouly@arm.com \
    --cc=kvmarm@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=oupton@kernel.org \
    --cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
    --cc=tabba@google.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox