From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.2 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5DF1EC432C2 for ; Wed, 25 Sep 2019 16:53:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2DCEE207E0 for ; Wed, 25 Sep 2019 16:53:03 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lists.infradead.org header.i=@lists.infradead.org header.b="SnyMxKFJ" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 2DCEE207E0 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=arm.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-arm-kernel-bounces+infradead-linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20170209; h=Sender:Content-Type: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Cc:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post:List-Archive: List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Date:Message-ID:From: References:To:Subject:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=6AMT3KItJPeagULkZx5RrSchBRYiSuj3+VHtouL/NiA=; b=SnyMxKFJ7NpEl4LHescHFa9nd VrgsH0ZYsc3oBjjaSB0IGc6geeexWxFOAVqzdSQhvhS4w5YB08sKHsQaYPBvr/rbkYNOEjej4hSAA 4uhWCVZivaUl2+NiJVmBlBo8w3VZpBalqkHWHRTSb5Q3QkAgXJdyS1c7IjI6S3UrjiiJV2Mq5AhNB gJlthB6qRf2o7ZuZEic9nYlC3GX2iHqVY9z+xb024Zb9hQh3SvjmQA866skMe6fZ5qUwFUyefa9vV jxnn2Dz99kFwYlnXmJr6BvWVHvTYvKsDF4+vKWVSf21JnADobY0iT2EeWNRTw5DWNUyifrx7FooqL /0u6CvgBg==; Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92.2 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1iDAX7-0005ZJ-NP; Wed, 25 Sep 2019 16:52:54 +0000 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.110.172]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92.2 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1iDAX2-0005XO-CW for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Wed, 25 Sep 2019 16:52:50 +0000 Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 37EA81570; Wed, 25 Sep 2019 09:52:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.1.197.57] (e110467-lin.cambridge.arm.com [10.1.197.57]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2F5133F67D; Wed, 25 Sep 2019 09:52:41 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/11] of: Fix DMA configuration for non-DT masters To: Rob Herring , Nicolas Saenz Julienne References: <20190924181244.7159-1-nsaenzjulienne@suse.de> <43fb5fe1de317d65a4edf592f88ea150c6e3b8cc.camel@suse.de> From: Robin Murphy Message-ID: Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2019 17:52:39 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.6.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Language: en-GB X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20190925_095248_546503_A1ACD42F X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 25.42 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org, Matthias Brugger , Frank Rowand , linux-arm-msm , linux-wireless , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , dri-devel , etnaviv@lists.freedesktop.org, "open list:DMA GENERIC OFFLOAD ENGINE SUBSYSTEM" , Florian Fainelli , Stefan Wahren , james.quinlan@broadcom.com, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org, xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org, Dan Williams , freedreno , "moderated list:ARM/FREESCALE IMX / MXC ARM ARCHITECTURE" , Linux Media Mailing List Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+infradead-linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On 25/09/2019 17:16, Rob Herring wrote: > On Wed, Sep 25, 2019 at 10:30 AM Nicolas Saenz Julienne > wrote: >> >> On Wed, 2019-09-25 at 16:09 +0100, Robin Murphy wrote: >>> On 25/09/2019 15:52, Nicolas Saenz Julienne wrote: >>>> On Tue, 2019-09-24 at 16:59 -0500, Rob Herring wrote: >>>>> On Tue, Sep 24, 2019 at 1:12 PM Nicolas Saenz Julienne >>>>> wrote: >>>>>> Hi All, >>>>>> this series tries to address one of the issues blocking us from >>>>>> upstreaming Broadcom's STB PCIe controller[1]. Namely, the fact that >>>>>> devices not represented in DT which sit behind a PCI bus fail to get the >>>>>> bus' DMA addressing constraints. >>>>>> >>>>>> This is due to the fact that of_dma_configure() assumes it's receiving a >>>>>> DT node representing the device being configured, as opposed to the PCIe >>>>>> bridge node we currently pass. This causes the code to directly jump >>>>>> into PCI's parent node when checking for 'dma-ranges' and misses >>>>>> whatever was set there. >>>>>> >>>>>> To address this I create a new API in OF - inspired from Robin Murphys >>>>>> original proposal[2] - which accepts a bus DT node as it's input in >>>>>> order to configure a device's DMA constraints. The changes go deep into >>>>>> of/address.c's implementation, as a device being having a DT node >>>>>> assumption was pretty strong. >>>>>> >>>>>> On top of this work, I also cleaned up of_dma_configure() removing its >>>>>> redundant arguments and creating an alternative function for the special >>>>>> cases >>>>>> not applicable to either the above case or the default usage. >>>>>> >>>>>> IMO the resulting functions are more explicit. They will probably >>>>>> surface some hacky usages that can be properly fixed as I show with the >>>>>> DT fixes on the Layerscape platform. >>>>>> >>>>>> This was also tested on a Raspberry Pi 4 with a custom PCIe driver and >>>>>> on a Seattle AMD board. >>>>> >>>>> Humm, I've been working on this issue too. Looks similar though yours >>>>> has a lot more churn and there's some other bugs I've found. >>>> >>>> That's good news, and yes now that I see it, some stuff on my series is >>>> overly >>>> complicated. Specially around of_translate_*(). >>>> >>>> On top of that, you removed in of_dma_get_range(): >>>> >>>> - /* >>>> - * At least empty ranges has to be defined for parent node if >>>> - * DMA is supported >>>> - */ >>>> - if (!ranges) >>>> - break; >>>> >>>> Which I assumed was bound to the standard and makes things easier. >>>> >>>>> Can you test out this branch[1]. I don't have any h/w needing this, >>>>> but wrote a unittest and tested with modified QEMU. >>>> >>>> I reviewed everything, I did find a minor issue, see the patch attached. >>> >>> WRT that patch, the original intent of "force_dma" was purely to >>> consider a device DMA-capable regardless of the presence of >>> "dma-ranges". Expecting of_dma_configure() to do anything for a non-OF >>> device has always been bogus - magic paravirt devices which appear out >>> of nowhere and expect to be treated as genuine DMA masters are a >>> separate problem that we haven't really approached yet. >> >> I agree it's clearly abusing the function. I have no problem with the behaviour >> change if it's OK with you. Thinking about it, you could probably just remove that call from the Xen DRM driver now anyway - since the dma-direct rework, we lost the ability to set dma_dummy_ops by default, and NULL ops now represent what it (presumably) wants. >> Robin, have you looked into supporting multiple dma-ranges? It's the next thing >> we need for BCM STB's PCIe. I'll have a go at it myself if nothing is in the >> works already. > > Multiple dma-ranges as far as configuring inbound windows should work > already other than the bug when there's any parent translation. But if > you mean supporting multiple DMA offsets and masks per device in the > DMA API, there's nothing in the works yet. There's also the in-between step of making of_dma_get_range() return a size based on all the dma-ranges entries rather than only the first one - otherwise, something like [1] can lead to pretty unworkable default masks. We implemented that when doing acpi_dma_get_range(), it's just that the OF counterpart never caught up. Robin. [1] http://linux-arm.org/git?p=linux-rm.git;a=commitdiff;h=a2814af56b3486c2985a95540a88d8f9fa3a699f _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel