public inbox for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>
To: Lee Yongjun <jun85566@gmail.com>
Cc: ulf.hansson@linaro.org, robh@kernel.org, krzk+dt@kernel.org,
	conor+dt@kernel.org, rjui@broadcom.com, sbranden@broadcom.com,
	bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com, nsaenz@kernel.org,
	linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: mmc: brcm,iproc-sdhci: allow dma-coherent property
Date: Fri, 6 Mar 2026 09:43:39 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <aa5093fc-18a9-4f23-ac18-0057204fe5b4@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260306-phenomenal-hamster-of-memory-819b2b@quoll>

On 06/03/2026 09:42, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 06, 2026 at 08:47:03AM +0900, Lee Yongjun wrote:
>> The Broadcom iProc SDHCI controller supports DMA, but its binding
>> schema does not allow the 'dma-coherent' property.
>>
>> As a result, dtbs_check reports the following validation errors
>> on the Northstar2 SoC:
>>
>>   mmc@66420000 (brcm,sdhci-iproc-cygnus): Unevaluated properties
>>   are not allowed ('dma-coherent' was unexpected)
>>   mmc@66430000 (brcm,sdhci-iproc-cygnus): Unevaluated properties
>>   are not allowed ('dma-coherent' was unexpected)
>>
>> Allow the 'dma-coherent' property in the schema to fix the validation
>> errors and accurately reflect the hardware capability.
> 
> So is the hardware capable of coherent DMA or not? Entire commit msg is
> silent about this and says how you fix warning without actually telling
> us that it is a correct fix.
> 

Heh, why am I reviewing it, it's obviously non-tested. Code is already
there!

NAK

Best regards,
Krzysztof


  reply	other threads:[~2026-03-06  8:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-03-05 23:47 [PATCH] dt-bindings: mmc: brcm,iproc-sdhci: allow dma-coherent property Lee Yongjun
2026-03-06  0:06 ` Florian Fainelli
2026-03-06  1:21 ` Rob Herring (Arm)
2026-03-06  8:42 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2026-03-06  8:43   ` Krzysztof Kozlowski [this message]
     [not found] ` <CAJ8Y1dTJ5yNPP8BN46BfDdLAvuWxW+OrZ+P538Bp9+3_6XankA@mail.gmail.com>
2026-03-06  8:45   ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2026-03-06 11:06 ` Lee Yongjun

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=aa5093fc-18a9-4f23-ac18-0057204fe5b4@kernel.org \
    --to=krzk@kernel.org \
    --cc=bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com \
    --cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=jun85566@gmail.com \
    --cc=krzk+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nsaenz@kernel.org \
    --cc=rjui@broadcom.com \
    --cc=robh@kernel.org \
    --cc=sbranden@broadcom.com \
    --cc=ulf.hansson@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox