From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: stefan@agner.ch (Stefan Agner) Date: Wed, 24 May 2017 23:48:02 -0700 Subject: [PATCH V2 4/5] dt-bindings: pinctrl: add imx7ulp pinctrl binding doc In-Reply-To: <20170525062347.GT26102@dragon> References: <1495177545-23006-1-git-send-email-aisheng.dong@nxp.com> <1495177545-23006-5-git-send-email-aisheng.dong@nxp.com> <5e78ef100319f229a87e33804384e5b3@agner.ch> <20170525031620.GS26102@dragon> <20170525062347.GT26102@dragon> Message-ID: To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On 2017-05-24 23:23, Shawn Guo wrote: > On Thu, May 25, 2017 at 05:04:58AM +0000, A.S. Dong wrote: >> If we really want to change, 'IMX7ULP1' may be a little strange as 'IMX7ULP' is >> the official external name and all other places are using it. >> So IMX7ULP may be more suitable. > > Yes, I actually meant IMX7ULP, which matches how we name the SoC > elsewhere in the kernel. > All the other arch/arm/boot/dts/imx*pinfunc.h use MX7ULP (without the I), but I am fine with either one. -- Stefan >> >> Then next generation may be: >> IMX7ULP0_PAD_PTC0_PTC0. >> Vs >> IMX7ULP_PAD_PTC0_PTC0 >> >> Just not much better than: >> ULP1_PAD_PTC0_PTC0. >> vs >> ULP0_PAD_PTC0_PTC0 >> >> That's why I did not do it initially. >> >> However, if you do want the change, i'm okay to do it. > > For the next generation, we will have a name for it in the kernel > anyway. The pinctrl macro simply follows that name. > > Shawn